America's newest comedy troupe: House GOP

There's 's not much levity in politics today, save for “New Yorker” satirist Andy Borowitz and maybe The Onion. But at their Baltimore retreat last weekend, House Republicans stepped up to provide Borowitz- and Onion-worthy laughs.

Along with welcoming their political master, President Donald TrumpDonald John TrumpWHCA calls on Trump to denounce video depicting him shooting media outlets Video of fake Trump shooting members of media shown at his Miami resort: report Trump hits Fox News's Chris Wallace over Ukraine coverage MORE, these self-avowed conservatives promised to repeal and replace the Affordable Care Act (ObamaCare) and to deal with the spiraling federal budget deficit — after the 2020 elections.

In evaluating that commitment, the record is instructive — so, as the sportscasters say, let's go to the tape.


For more than nine years, congressional Republicans have failed to devise a viable health care alternative.

In the 2016 campaign, candidate Trump promised to offer an ObamaCare replacement that would be "something terrific" — better coverage, more protection at a lower cost.

We're still waiting.

For two years, while the Republicans controlled the entire law-making apparatus in Washington — the White House and both houses of Congress — they failed.

Trump continues to denounce John McCainJohn Sidney McCainVideo of fake Trump shooting members of media shown at his Miami resort: report Remembering leaders who put country above party Graham-Trump rollercoaster hits dizzying speed MORE, who died more than a year ago, for sabotaging an alternative in 2017.

That bill, called a “skinny repeal,” was an acknowledged sham. It was rushed to the floor without a single hearing, and — according to an analysis from the Congressional Budget Office — would have thrown at least 15 million off the insurance rolls and caused premiums to soar.


Sen. Lindsey GrahamLindsey Olin GrahamFurious Republicans prepare to rebuke Trump on Syria Democrats to offer resolution demanding Trump reverse Syria decision Army officer calls Syria pullback 'a stain on the American conscience' MORE (R-S.C.) called it a "fraud," and Sen. Mike RoundsMarion (Mike) Michael RoundsAmerica's newest comedy troupe: House GOP 'Mike Pounce' trends on Twitter after Trump slip at GOP retreat Conservatives offer stark warning to Trump, GOP on background checks MORE (R-S.D.) feared the health insurance "markets may collapse” if it was enacted. Both, under pressure from Trump, voted for it under the phony pretense it might be a holding action.

McCain, an opponent of Obamacare, refused to play this duplicitous game and cast his famous thumbs down vote to kill it.

Desperate, Sen. Graham and Sen. Bill CassidyWilliam (Bill) Morgan CassidyUN Security Council to meet after Turkey launches Syria offensive Trump faces growing GOP revolt on Syria To win the federal paid family leave debate, allow states to lead the way MORE (R-La.) came back with a measure turning over many of ACA's functions to the states. This not only would have added to the uninsured rolls, and especially hit poor Medicaid beneficiaries, but also threatened guaranteed coverage protections for millions of Americans with pre-existing conditions, which every Republican proposal did.

The Trump administration, which still is trying to have the courts throw out the entire law, used a scaled-back Graham-Cassidy measure in its budget.

The result under any Trump or Congressional Republican initiative, says Aviva Aaron-Dine, the top health care analyst at the liberal Center for Budget and Policy Priorities, "would be that lower income people, older people and sicker people would all be exposed to higher costs, and overall the individual market would look a lot like it did before the ACA."

However House Republican claims to go after the deficit following the next election is even funnier.

House minority leader Kevin McCarthyKevin Owen McCarthyFurious Republicans prepare to rebuke Trump on Syria Five ways Trump's Syria decision spells trouble The Hill's Morning Report — Arrest of Giuliani associates triggers many questions MORE (R-Calif.), as shallow on policy as he is steeped in politics, vowed "the first thing we would do is make sure our debt is taken care of.”

In the first fiscal year under Barack ObamaBarack Hussein ObamaEach of us has a role in preventing veteran suicide Why calls for impeachment have become commonplace Meet Trump's most trusted pollsters MORE, largely due to the greatest financial crisis since the depression, the deficit soared to more than $1.4 trillion. Congressional Republicans were horrified. When the annual deficit was cut by a third the last several years of the Obama Administration, they remained critical, shocked at the fiscal irresponsibility.

Candidate Trump insisted he not only would eliminate deficits but — within eight years — wipe out the entire national debt.

Two promises he kept were to enact a massive tax cut costing $1.9 trillion over a decade and not touching spending on the big Medicare and Social Security benefits.

No surprise that the annual deficit has soared to over $1 trillion this year and is projected to remain at that level — or higher — throughout the next decade.

The national debt has increased to more than $22 trillion, and by the end of the next decade will rise to 95 percent of the gross domestic product, the highest level since right after World War II.


The vast majority of House Republicans voted for those huge tax cuts currently propelling the deficit and have remained silent on cutting politically popular entitlements.

In responding to McCarthy and other born-again-to-be deficit hawks, Maya McGuineas, who runs the bi-partisan committee for a Responsible Federal Budget, notes: "Having people who voted for the tax cuts and huge spending increases now calling for fiscal responsibility rings a bit hollow, to put it mildly."

These Republicans calculate they might get away with this hypocrisy by focusing on Democrats wanting to kill ObamaCare to replace it with a government-run plan and embracing a wildly expensive domestic agenda.

That's their only choice under Trump, to whom they have sold their policy, as well as their political souls.

Albert R. Hunt is the former executive editor of Bloomberg News. He previously served as reporter, bureau chief and Washington editor for the Wall Street Journal. For almost a quarter-century he wrote a column on politics for The Wall Street Journal, then the International New York Times and Bloomberg View. Follow him on Twitter @alhuntdc.