Pelosi’s miscalculation and Trump hatred
This week was one of the worst on record for the Democratic Party, and it’s been entirely self-inflicted. The meltdown in Iowa, the acquittal of President Trump, and the emerging schism between the far left and the Democratic establishment are all manifesting as a result of gross miscalculations by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.).
The thesis going in must have rested on a misguided belief that impeachment would damage Trump and disadvantage the three senators who were challenging Joe Biden for the nomination. Then Biden would outperform his history and expectations, and the party would unify around electability in the form of the former vice president.
But “electability” is merely PC speak for “Trump hatred.” Since Trump hatred is the only issue Democrats can agree on, it must have seemed like a reasonable theme to Pelosi.
With the unfolding events, we are seeing that this thesis rested on three gross miscalculations: (1) Biden has magically transformed into a viable candidate, (2) the establishment can use Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) and his legions of followers when it suits them and then push them aside when it counts, and (3) the case against Trump would attract bipartisan support. All three assumptions are proving to be without merit.
Pelosi and the Democratic establishment must not have been paying attention to Biden’s long record of terrible presidential campaigns. Biden didn’t even make it to Iowa during his 1988 run and didn’t make it out of Iowa when he ran again in 2008.
Entering 2020, Biden’s high name identification and a crowded field were his best assets. Now both advantages have faded away. Once a top tier of candidates formed, the name ID advantage expired.
More importantly, as the field winnowed, Biden was subject to more visibility and scrutiny.
With many candidates on the debate stage, his fragility was less evident. Now, with fewer on stage and more time for each candidate, Biden’s incapacity has been on full display.
The Iowa caucus results show that his viability as the Democratic nominee is collapsing. This will be reaffirmed in New Hampshire and Nevada. If he fails to win South Carolina, it’s over. It could even be over before then.
Meanwhile, the seeds sown after Hillary Clinton cheated Bernie out of the 2016 nomination were reaped on Monday night. As part of the concessions demanded by Bernie to endorse Hillary in 2016, there would be new technology used to count the votes in Iowa, and there would be three iterative counts released so he wouldn’t be cheated out of a win next time around. What could go wrong?
As bad as the Iowa dumpster fire was, it isn’t the main problem. The main problem is that the anti-Trump coalition of democratic socialists and the Democratic establishment lack sufficient overlap to unify the party.
The one remaining plausible hope could be Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.) because her identity as a relatively young woman might appease the identity-obsessed hard left, and her comparatively moderate policy stances might appease the establishment.
But it won’t happen because of Mike Bloomberg. The former New York City mayor has spent more than $300 million on various forms of advertising. Spending money is not as important as developing the loyalty that comes from raising small donor money — like Bernie has done — but it still counts. If Bloomberg has a big delegate haul after Super Tuesday, then by March 4 he may be the only viable alternative to Bernie.
Which leaves us with the Trump impeachment. Instead of attracting bipartisan support, it unfolded like the Brett Kavanaugh hearings: with both sides dug in and rallying their base. That might have worked if the Democrats could unify around Trump hatred. But as it is playing out, it’s not going to be enough. They have a really big problem.
The Democrats have a schism over policy, and it is now on full display. Congratulations, Speaker Pelosi. You have inadvertently made Trump’s case: The Democrats waste all their time and energy hating Trump, and they can’t agree on how to accomplish anything for the American people.
Dan Palmer is a Republican donor and conservative political strategist.
The Hill has removed its comment section, as there are many other forums for readers to participate in the conversation. We invite you to join the discussion on Facebook and Twitter.