To winnow primary field, Obama and other Democrats must speak out 

To winnow primary field, Obama and other Democrats must speak out 
© Getty Images

As Super Tuesday looms, none of the seven remaining Democratic presidential candidates has signaled any intention to leave the race. If allowed to continue, this could spell disaster for Democrats, increasing the already significant chance that no candidate will have a majority of delegates before the convention. This in turn will leave the party deeply susceptible to an open split between its liberal and moderate wings in Milwaukee, which could make beating President Donald TrumpDonald John TrumpProtesters tear down statue of Christopher Columbus in Baltimore 'Independence Day' star Bill Pullman urges Americans to wear a 'freedom mask' in July 4 PSA Protesters burn American flag outside White House after Trump's July Fourth address MORE that much harder.

It’s time for party leaders to step in. As soon as the Super Tuesday returns become clear, Barack ObamaBarack Hussein ObamaSunday shows preview: Lawmakers to address alarming spike in coronavirus cases History will judge America by how well we truly make Black lives matter What July 4 means for November 3 MORE and other top Dems must call for all but the top three candidates to leave the race, immediately, before the next large rounds of primaries March 10 and 17. Only this action can force otherwise reluctant candidates to put party ahead of ego and drop out.

Until now, former President Obama’s reluctance to weigh in too heavily on the primary process has been understandable, even laudable, as he has been clearly worried that siding with, for example, his former Vice President Joe BidenJoe BidenTrump hits 'radical left,' news media, China in Independence Day address Kaepernick on July Fourth: 'We reject your celebration of white supremacy' Jaime Harrison seeks to convince Democrats he can take down Lindsey Graham MORE would alienate liberals supporting Sen. Bernie SandersBernie SandersThe Memo: Unhappy voters could deliver political shocks beyond Trump Democratic senator will introduce bill mandating social distancing on flights after flying on packed plane Neil Young opposes use of his music at Trump Mount Rushmore event: 'I stand in solidarity with the Lakota Sioux' MORE (I-Vt.) or Sen. Elizabeth WarrenElizabeth WarrenThe Hill's Campaign Report: Biden chips away at Trump's fundraising advantage Warnock raises almost M in Georgia Senate race in second quarter The Hill's Morning Report - Trump lays low as approval hits 18-month low MORE (D.Mass.) and exacerbate rather than heal ideological fractures within the party.


But such prudence could quickly turn into political malfeasance if perpetuated beyond Tuesday’s vote. Obama must now speak out clearly and forcefully. 

Many other senior Democrats — figures like Ed Rendell, Harry ReidHarry Mason ReidMcConnell warns Democrats not to change filibuster rule Filibuster reform gains steam with Democrats The Hill's Morning Report - Trump wants executive order on policing; silent on pending bills MORE, Jennifer Granholm, and Claire McCaskillClaire Conner McCaskillTrump mocked for low attendance at rally Missouri county issues travel advisory for Lake of the Ozarks after Memorial Day parties Senate faces protracted floor fight over judges amid pandemic safety concerns MORE — should likewise sing the “It’s Time to Leave” tune before it’s too late.

First out must obviously be left-wing billionaire crusader Tom SteyerTom SteyerThe Hill's Campaign Report: Jacksonville mandates face coverings as GOP convention approaches Steyer endorses Markey in Massachusetts Senate primary Celebrities fundraise for Markey ahead of Massachusetts Senate primary MORE, who has so far spent more than $52 million in January alone without winning a single delegate, while polling at about 2 percent nationally. He is now known mostly for his bizarre attempt to buy votes in South Carolina, a foray that has only hurt Joe Biden for no evident strategic purpose (except perhaps to help Sanders or fellow billionaire and former New York City Mayor Mike Bloomberg).

This also means Sen. Amy KlobucharAmy KlobucharDemocrats: A moment in history, use it wisely The Hill's Coronavirus Report: Rep. Rodney Davis says most important thing White House can do on COVID-19 is give consistent messaging; US new cases surpass 50k for first time The Hill's Coronavirus Report: Stagwell President Mark Penn says Trump is losing on fighting the virus; Fauci says U.S. 'going in the wrong direction' in fight against virus MORE (D-Minn.) must exit, since she lacks a national campaign structure and will probably finish far back March 3 in mega-states like California and Texas, with very few delegates to show. While some in Klobuchar’s camp may believe staying in the race for a few more weeks would increase her chances of gaining a VP nomination, in actuality showing a willingness to put party first might make her a unifying figure and thus more valuable to the eventual nominee.

Trickier are the fates of Biden, Bloomberg, Warren and former South Bend, Ind., Mayor Pete ButtigiegPete ButtigiegDemocratic lawmakers call for expanding, enshrining LGBTQ rights Democrats debate Biden effort to expand map against Trump The Hill's Morning Report - Presented by Facebook - Dems, GOP dig in on police reform ahead of House vote MORE.


Warren has at least finished third once and fourth twice, but the trajectory of her campaign is unmistakably downward, as Sanders has sucked out all the left-wing oxygen her campaign formerly thrived on. And while she might be tempted to bow out and endorse Sanders, she would be wiser to keep her powder dry, as the nomination is by no means yet guaranteed for the Vermont Democratic socialist. After all, Sanders has yet to show that he can expand his appeal to a majority of primary voters in any state: he actually gained many fewer votes in neighboring New Hampshire than he did in 2016.

Buttigieg might understandably be reluctant to leave the campaign next week given his impressive finishes in Iowa and New Hampshire. Yet the structural challenges of his campaign mirror those of Klobuchar, albeit Buttigieg is raising a bit more money. And for all his criticisms of Sanders, it must be increasingly clear to Mayor Pete that his continued presence in the race is only likely to help the 78-year-old junior senator from Vermont. A huge surprise strong showing by Buttigieg in California or another major state Tuesday could, of course, alter this dynamic. But absent such a miracle, the 37-year-old former South Bend mayor must look to play the long game, recognizing that putting party above his temporary self-interest may yield remarkable long-run dividends from grateful Democrats in presidential races for decades to come.

No surprise, Bloomberg’s calculus is entirely dominated by money. The blunt argument of his camp and supporters is that only his billions can monopolize the airwaves and web sufficiently to be the viable alternative to Sanders. With an astounding $500 million and counting already spent, this proposition will be thoroughly tested in California, Texas and other large states Tuesday. If Bloomberg performs poorly even after the largest political spending spree in political history, Democrats should unite in calling for him to get out. 

But even in this event, another problem becomes clear — Bloomberg is not really a Democrat. A famously defiant figure, he will likely feel no compunction to leave the race no matter what effect he is having, or whoever asks him to. For all those Democrats who secretly hope his billions can defeat Sanders, and then Trump, this is the real devil’s bargain of Bloomberg. Moreover, the liberal wing of the party (and even some moderates) are increasingly outraged that one of richest 10 people in the world is attempting to buy their nomination, perhaps willfully in defiance of party interests. And, as I recently wrote, his continued presence may also further radicalize many Democrats into supporting Sanders as a matter of party solidarity and reaction against Bloomberg as demonstrable manifestation of the very plutocracy Sanders is running against.

It is Biden who may face the hardest choice. He must clearly win South Carolina and then do better than expected in Super Tuesday, for no other reason than to replenish his rapidly dwindling campaign coffers. Yet when the smoke clears March 4, it may be that party regulars rediscover the virtues of Uncle Joe — namely that he has a better chance than Bloomberg or Sanders of unifying rather than splitting the Party. 

Whatever the results March 3, party leaders must finally speak up and force out the four or five candidates who will clearly have no chance of winning. To do less is simply to watch as Sanders wins a plurality in state after state, and Democrats end up with a nominee who has less than majority support in his own party.

Paul Bledsoe is president of Bledsoe & Associates, a policy and communications consultancy. He is also a lecturer at American University’s Center for Environmental Policy. He served as staff member in the U.S. House, Senate Finance Committee, Interior Department and on President Bill ClintonWilliam (Bill) Jefferson ClintonPoll finds Biden with narrow lead over Trump in Missouri Trump's mark on federal courts could last decades Obama, Clinton join virtual celebration for Negro Leagues MORE’s White House Climate Change Task Force.