How Congress dismissed women's empowerment

How Congress dismissed women's empowerment
© Greg Nash

When the State Department authorization bill tanked in December, Democrats and Republicans blamed one another. Rep. Eliot EngelEliot Lance EngelState Department sets up new bureau for cybersecurity and emerging technologies How Congress dismissed women's empowerment 2020: A year in photos MORE (D-N.Y.), the outgoing chair of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, and Ivanka TrumpIvanka TrumpRubio: Trump impeachment trial is 'stupid' The Hill's Morning Report - Biden's crisis agenda hits headwinds NRSC chair says he'll back GOP incumbents against Trump primary challengers MORE, adviser to her father in the White House, lost a “legacy” piece of legislation, and significant improvements in U.S. diplomacy went unauthorized for the 17th year in a row. Worse, women around the world may have lost an opportunity for economic empowerment.

Here is the lesson both parties should take away from the bill’s scuttling: Start taking women’s issues more seriously, and sooner in the process. Some were quick to spin the fiasco as the result of last-minute White House interference over a trivial matter. The facts, however, deserve a more sober review.    

House and Senate leaders from both parties decided to attach a House-passed fiscal year 2020 State authorization bill to the conference report for the 2021 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), after 17 years without such agreement. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnellAddison (Mitch) Mitchell McConnellSchumer: Impeachment trial will be quick, doesn't need a lot of witnesses McConnell: Power-sharing deal can proceed after Manchin, Sinema back filibuster Budowsky: A Biden-McConnell state of emergency summit MORE (R-Ky.) pulled the State authorization clause when Democrats rejected language in it that would have codified the Women’s Global Development and Prosperity Initiative, or W-GDP.


The W-GDP measure was not “air-dropped” into the bill, as Engel alleged after its failure. Instead, the White House had been talking with Democrats about W-GDP legislation for 18 months, since the launch of the White House strategy implementing the 2017 Women, Peace, and Security Act. That unanimously-passed, bipartisan bill was followed the next year by the 2018 Women’s Entrepreneurship and Economic Empowerment Act (WEEE).

Ivanka Trump and Sen. Jeanne ShaheenCynthia (Jeanne) Jeanne ShaheenModerates vow to 'be a force' under Biden Bipartisan Senate gang to talk with Biden aide on coronavirus relief Bipartisan group of senators: The election is over MORE (D-N.H.) collaborated to get the WEEE Act passed. With that success behind them, they introduced W-GDP legislation in February 2020, co-sponsored by Shaheen and Sen. Lindsey GrahamLindsey Olin GrahamSenators spar over validity of Trump impeachment trial Trump selects South Carolina lawyer for impeachment trial Democrats formally elect Harrison as new DNC chair MORE (R-S.C.), and Reps. Michael McCaulMichael Thomas McCaulKremlin: US statements about pro-Navalny protests show 'direct support for the violation of the law' Thousands detained at pro-Navalny rallies in Moscow Cheney tests Trump grip on GOP post-presidency MORE (R-Texas) and Lois FrankelLois Jane FrankelHow Congress dismissed women's empowerment Frankel defeats Loomer in Florida House race Live updates: Democrats seek to extend House advantage MORE (D-Fla.). This is hardly a last-minute “air-drop.”  

Shaheen ended the W-GDP collaboration when she and House Speaker Nancy PelosiNancy PelosiOklahoma man who videotaped himself with his feet on desk in Pelosi's office during Capitol riot released on bond House formally sends impeachment to Senate, putting Trump on trial for Capitol riot With another caravan heading North, a closer look at our asylum law MORE (D-Calif.) rejected the latest White House proposal, then part of the State Department reauthorization in the NDAA. The language, like that negotiated for the stand-alone bill, would have authorized a women’s economic empowerment ambassador in the State Department, an interagency steering group, and $1 billion in funding over five years. 

Here’s the point: The White House insisted, and Democrats accepted, that iterative drafts would  focus tightly on five factors holding women back in the marketplace: accessing institutions, building credit, owning and managing property, traveling freely, and removing restrictions on employment. The White House touted the bipartisan nature of the initiative, promoting the five factors to some fanfare over the course of the administration. 

So uncontroversial was W-GDP that when Frankel took the mic at the end of a public event in 2019 and said there can be no economic empowerment without abortion rights, a few guests applauded, a few gasped, and a few more got up and walked out. But no one expected her view to change the initiative. After all, Congress had just doubled its budget, from $50 million to $100 million in its first year, precisely because W-GDP was uncontroversial. So, when the White House included language in the last iteration to ensure that W-GDP funds would not be used to fund abortion, nothing changed substantively.


Shaheen and Pelosi, in what turned out to be a miscalculation, countered that the bill had to remain open to funding reproductive rights. They apparently assumed Republicans would either remove the women’s program or keep it without the abortion-neutrality language. But Republicans took both seriously enough to risk kicking the State authorization bill one more year down the road. Shaheen’s and Pelosi’s overreach did no favors for Engel, who had counted on the Senate reauthorization as a legacy at the end of his 30-year congressional career. 

That the leaders’ rare display of comity on State authorization was scuttled by a women’s issue Sen. Chris CoonsChris Andrew CoonsHawley files ethics counter-complaint against seven Democratic senators Moderates vow to 'be a force' under Biden Democrats seek answers on impact of Russian cyberattack on Justice Department, Courts MORE (D-Del.) found “galling.” But why? Aren’t these the same lawmakers who say women’s rights and well-being are an important foreign and security policy priority?

The lesson here is that neither party can afford to see women’s policy as marginal, or women’s programs as “tacked on.” That a rare display of congressional unity was scuttled when a president put his foot down over a women’s empowerment initiative should give women on both sides of the aisle some encouragement. To the contrary, comments equating important policy differences to “throwing a tantrum,” calling W-GDP a “pet” project, and likening it to a “girl’s pony” belittle women and trivialize women’s empowerment. Would the same terms be used if the White House had insisted on, say, another nuclear aircraft carrier? 

The White House raised the bar, to scorn and approbation, on the scrutiny Republicans are willing to give international women’s programs. When the new Congress convenes, both sides would do well to adjust to the higher standard. Women’s economic empowerment overseas improves every American’s security and prosperity at home. Making women’s empowerment a foreign policy priority depends on keeping it a bipartisan issue.

Susan Yoshihara, Ph.D., is the president of the American Council on Women, Peace and Security and author of “Waging War to Make Peace: U.S. Intervention in Global Conflicts.” Follow her on Twitter at @susan_yoshihara.