Player of the Week: Sen. Harry Reid (D-Nev.)

President Obama is facing a likely defeat on his Syria authorization request, but the White House is attempting to change the minds of many members.

He has gotten help from Senate Majority Leader Harry ReidHarry ReidOvernight Finance: Obama signs Puerto Rico bill | Trump steps up attacks on trade | Dodd-Frank backers cheer 'too big to fail' decision | New pressure to fill Ex-Im board Iowa poll: Clinton up 14 on Trump, Grassley in tight race with Dem Lynch meeting with Bill Clinton creates firestorm for email case MORE (D-Nev.), who on Monday compared Syria’s use of chemical weapons to actions by the Nazis.

ADVERTISEMENT
In his speech on the Senate floor, Reid said he watched videos of the chemical attacks, adding: “I will never get that out of my mind. ... This brutality deserves a response.”

The first vote on Syria is expected to occur in the Senate. The Obama administration hopes passage in the upper chamber will generate momentum in the House, where “no” votes have been piling up.

But getting through the Senate is no sure thing; the Senate Foreign Relations Committee last week approved it by only a 10-7 vote.

Some Democrats, including Sen. Mark PryorMark PryorEx-Sen. Kay Hagan joins lobby firm Top Democrats are no advocates for DC statehood Ex-Sen. Landrieu joins law and lobby firm MORE (Ark.), Heidi HeitkampHeidi HeitkampOvernight Finance: Obama signs Puerto Rico bill | Trump steps up attacks on trade | Dodd-Frank backers cheer 'too big to fail' decision | New pressure to fill Ex-Im board Senate Dems urge Shelby to take up Ex-Im nomination Gun-control supporters plan next steps versus NRA MORE (N.D.) and Brian Schatz (Hawaii), have said they oppose American military intervention.

Reid must minimize defections or the Syria initiative will fail in his chamber. Most Republicans will probably vote “no,” and some might support a filibuster.

Reid has been able to unite his caucus in the past, but whipping on a war-related measure is tricky. He has urged his Democratic colleagues to at least vote with the president on torpedoing a filibuster.

It is open to doubt, however, that if they did so, there would also be a majority willing to vote “yes” on the underlying bill, especially as the public is strongly opposed to intervention.

At this point, Reid can only do so much. It is up to the president to change minds, and he is undertaking a media blitz to do so, which will culminate in Tuesday’s address to the nation. After that, Reid will try to win over skeptical members of his caucus.