A recent article in The Washington Post on “The ‘heartbreaking’ decrease in black homeownership” details many of the complicated issues that have contributed to African-American homeownership declining to a level lower than when the Fair Housing Act was passed in 1968.
Yet dangerous myths continue to undercut efforts to understand why this homeownership gap persists. It’s a subject that is the focus of a new working group of National Housing Conference (NHC) members, which will develop concrete, practical strategies to reverse this trend, which continues to get worse.
Discrimination is most often cited as the reason for the decline, and while it is clearly embedded into the foundation of the problem, we also must be cognizant of the fact that historic changes in law and regulation have failed to have a meaningful and lasting impact on the homeownership rate.
We also need to do a much better job of understanding the current drivers of the homeownership gap and the most impactful strategies to close it. To do this, we are also going to have to let go of some popular myths about what happened during the housing disaster of 2004-2014.
One of these myths is that the housing crisis was caused by efforts to help African Americans become homeowners. This myth is dangerously misleading. Even the Washington Post falls into this trap when it states that “enticed by relaxed lending policies and plenty of affordable housing, African Americans purchased homes in record numbers at the peak of the housing bubble.”
While the foreclosure crisis hit African Americans particularly hard, it was not because African Americans became homeowners as the bubble inflated.
By comparing the change in homeownership rates by race/ethnicity between 1994 and 2000, it’s clear that African-American and Hispanic homeownership rose at similar rates, gaining five points in almost as many years, significantly exceeding the growth rate of all other groups.
During the run-up to the peak of the crisis, however, African-American homeownership remained relatively flat, increasing less than one point. During the same period, the Hispanic/Latino homeownership rate increased by over three more points. White homeownership rose by another two points.
The fact is that the largest increase in African-American homeownership occurred between 1994 and 2001, when lenders across the country, encouraged by government sponsored investors Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, sought out African-American first-time home buyers in record numbers.
These were overwhelmingly responsible, well-documented, long-term, fixed-rate loans that performed well. But as housing values rose, the equity wealth these loans created became a tempting target for cash-out refinancing.
African Americans were increasingly targeted for equity-stripping loans that appeared to cost little but were actually both expensive and risky. The chart below makes clear how the African-American homeownership gains that predated the crisis were wiped out in just a few years.
When the market crashed, everyone was hurt. White homeownership fell nearly three points, as did Hispanic and Asian homeownership. But African-American homeownership plunged nearly twice as much — a total of 5.8 points — despite having the smallest increase in homeownership during the previous five years. Why? We don’t know yet.
One factor is likely to be the role of cash-out refinancing, which reduced equity in the original prime loan and was then replaced with an unsustainable subprime loan. This was not the case in Texas, however, where cash-out refinancing was strictly limited by law.
A study conducted by the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas found that “at the peak of the housing crisis, the share of subprime mortgages underwater in Texas was 40 percentage points below the rest of the nation, with serious delinquencies among subprime borrowers about ten percentage points lower.”
It is likely that many — maybe most — African Americans who lost their homes were first refinanced into toxic mortgage products they could not maintain. The worsening recession leveraged these trends, and concentrations of foreclosures in poor, historically African-American neighborhoods drove up vacancy and blight, which further fed the cycle.
Once we understand the cause, we can address an even harder issue: how we prevent it in the future and how we convince hundreds of thousands of African Americans whose American dream was turned into a nightmare to trust the system again.
David Dworkin is president and CEO of the National Housing Conference. He served in a variety of capacities in the administrations of Presidents George H. W. Bush, Barack ObamaBarack Hussein ObamaBill Maher, Isiah Thomas score over the NFL's playing of 'Black national anthem' Democrats confront 'Rubik's cube on steroids' White House debates vaccines for air travel MORE and Donald TrumpDonald TrumpTrump takes shot at new GOP candidate in Ohio over Cleveland nickname GOP political operatives indicted over illegal campaign contribution from Russian national in 2016 On The Money — Dems dare GOP to vote for shutdown, default MORE.