The views expressed by contributors are their own and not the view of The Hill

President Trump’s good deed — talking up the dollar


President Trump’s smackdown of Peter Navarro, assistant to the president and director of trade and manufacturing policy, for Navarro’s call to weaken the U.S. dollar was a breath of fresh air in an otherwise protectionist administration.

Since his appointment to the Trump administration, Navarro has led a one-man crusade against China, claimed near and far that tariffs on imports harm foreign exporters but not American consumers and spewed nonsense that would have earned any freshman economics student a grade of “F.”

Clearly, the president is concerned about foreign currency manipulation—that other countries are using exchange rates to seek short-term economic advantages, the principal culprit being China. The history of that nation’s currency fluctuations — courtesy of the Beijing government rather than global monetary forces — is akin to a roller coaster. For years the yuan had been artificially low, then steadily strengthened and now it is declining in value.

Weakening a currency to boost exports is always a temptation, but beggar-thy-neighbor policies lead to competitive devaluations with everyone worse off. For the U.S. to devalue its currency, as Navarro advocates, would yield only negligible benefits. Since contrary to popular belief, the U.S. is not a heavily trade-dependent nation, unlike other nations such as those in emerging markets. For the U.S., trade represents only between 12 percent and 15 percent of GDP. And our trade with China, a mere 13 percent.

The benefits of a strong U.S. dollar are multifold. Start with consumers. Consumer spending accounts for approximately 70 percent of the U.S. economy, and a stronger dollar is a net benefit for this prime driver of the economy. Less expensive consumer goods means more disposable income for Americans, with the stronger domestic demand helping the detrimental impact of a strong dollar (e.g., more U.S. tourism to offset the decline in foreign tourism due to the appreciating dollar).

As for industry, the effect of the stronger dollar is mixed, but with benefits exceeding costs. Recognizably, in the case of U.S. manufacturing companies, they can be hit especially hard by the rising dollar, as they have to compete in a global market; and a domestic currency that is even 5 percent stronger can have a considerable impact on their competitiveness. And commodities (priced in U.S. dollars) can be negatively impacted by too strong a dollar.

On the other hand, an appreciating dollar benefits companies that import a great deal of machinery and equipment, like engineering and industrial companies, since these would now cost less in dollar terms. A strong dollar means inputs, process systems from abroad, such as Germany, Switzerland, Austria and Sweden allow U.S. firms to improve efficiency and productivity.

The stronger dollar gives the biggest advantage to companies that import most of their goods but sell domestically, since their top-line and bottom-line benefit from robust domestic demand and lower input costs. Most importantly, a strong dollar’s greatest impact on industry is by its forcing domestic industries to be more efficient. In in doing, these industries become more competitive worldwide, including in those markets where the exporting country’s currency is stronger than import receiving countries’ currencies.

In terms of inbound investment from foreign countries, an appreciating dollar will boost returns from those investments; and domestic as well as foreign investors can take comfort in the fact that a strong dollar will keep interest rates low and keep a lid on inflation.

One should take note particularly that the estimated $270 billion in foreign investment that entered the U.S. in 2018 is responsible for employing more than seven million Americans by foreign affiliates who spend nearly $300 billion. Over 25 percent of U.S. exports come from these companies. For the U.S. affiliates and distributors of firms such as Samsung, Mercedes-Benz, Toyota, Motorola Mobility and Siemens, their supply chains enable them to more efficiently export to, and produce in, the U.S.

Additionally, the U.S. government’s $389 billion in interest payments on the national debt would be less costly to service.

The bottom line is that a strong U.S. dollar is a net positive for the U.S. economy, as robust consumer demand and muted inflation results in strong economic growth, off-setting negative effects such as the impact on exports and corporate earnings. As Treasury Secretary Mnuchin has asserted: “I do believe in a strong dollar, which signifies a strong U.S. economy, a strong stock market….”

Advocating and implementing policies to keep the dollar strong are unquestionably vital to our national interest. Therefore, it behooves the Trump administration to ensure that its entire economic team speaks with one voice on this issue.

Jerry Haar is a professor of international business at Florida International University and a global fellow of the Woodrow Wilson Institute for Scholars in Washington, D.C. His latest book, with Ricardo Ernst, is “Globalization, Competitiveness and Governability.”

Tags China-U.S. trade war Currency war Donald Trump Foreign exchange market Peter Navarro Peter Navarro

More Finance News

See All
See all Hill.TV See all Video

Most Popular

Load more


See all Video