SPONSORED:

Statesmen seek bipartisan solutions to big challenges

Statesmen seek bipartisan solutions to big challenges
© Greg Nash

America’s capital is distracted and in disarray. One of the most dangerous results is that there is a long list of policy issues that have been neglected.

One particularly dangerous example is that three of our nation’s most important programs – Social Security, Medicare and highway trust funds – are heading toward insolvency, a situation the numbers clearly bear out but our lawmakers have continued to ignore.

Last month, senators and former governors Mitt RomneyWillard (Mitt) Mitt RomneyImpeachment trial tests Trump's grip on Senate GOP 'Almost Heaven, West Virginia' — Joe Manchin and a 50-50 Senate The Hill's Morning Report - Biden asks Congress to expand largest relief response in U.S. history MORE (R-Utah) and Joe ManchinJoseph (Joe) ManchinSenate Democrats leery of nixing filibuster Manchin: Removing Hawley, Cruz with 14th Amendment 'should be a consideration' 'Almost Heaven, West Virginia' — Joe Manchin and a 50-50 Senate MORE (D-W.Va.) and Reps. Mike GallagherMichael (Mike) John Gallagher'I saw my life flash before my eyes': An oral history of the Capitol attack GOP lawmaker on protesters storming Capitol: 'I have not seen anything like this since I deployed to Iraq' GOP lawmakers plead for calm, urge Trump to help restore order amid Capitol violence MORE (R-Wis.) and Ed CaseEdward (Ed) CaseMORE (D-Hawaii) led the introduction of a smart, new approach to ending this dangerous procrastination.

ADVERTISEMENT

Noteworthy in and of itself is a bill that is bipartisan, bicameral and attempts to solve pressing policy challenges. Even more encouraging, this bill has a chance of working. 

Cosponsors so far include Sens. Todd YoungTodd Christopher Young'I saw my life flash before my eyes': An oral history of the Capitol attack US Chamber of Commerce to stop supporting some lawmakers following the Capitol riots GOP senator confronted by Trump supporters over electoral challenge: 'The law matters' MORE (R-Ind.), Doug Jones (D-Ala.) and Kyrsten Sinema (D-Ariz.), as well as Reps. Ben McAdams (D-Utah), William TimmonsWilliam Evan TimmonsREAD: The Republicans who voted to challenge election results Post-pandemic, small businesses need sustainable opportunity Trump campaign launches new fundraising program with House Republicans MORE (R-S.C.) and Scott PetersScott H. PetersCalifornia was key factor in House GOP's 2020 success Trump's illness sparks new urgency for COVID-19 deal Moderate Democrats push leadership to pull marijuana legislation MORE (D-Calif.).

The Time to Rescue United States Trusts Act, or the TRUST Act, would create commissions (deemed “rescue committees”) for each major endangered trust fund to try to prevent its looming insolvency. Soon after enactment, the 12 members of each rescue committee would seek consensus on reforms to these programs.

The gaps between spending and revenue are rapidly depleting the trust funds. They are projected to run out of assets as soon as 2022 (highway), 2026 (Medicare Part A) and 2032-2034 (Social Security Old Age and Survivors Insurance). When balances are drawn down, each fund will only be able to pay out from incoming revenue. Social Security benefits would be cut across-the-board by 20-25 percent, Medicare Part A would have to reduce spending by 13 percent and highway spending would decline by 29 percent. This is no way to run a country.

Allowing those automatic cuts would be devastating to people who are in need as well as for critical infrastructure. Fortunately, Congress has a wide range of options to phase in appropriate combinations of reasonable spending reductions and revenue increases. There are many ways to rebalance Social Security, including many smart improvements that would be pro-growth while protecting those who depend on the program. Medicare reforms are among many possibilities for reducing the cost of health care. There are numerous options to raise new revenue for highway programs or reduce lower-priority spending.

ADVERTISEMENT

There will certainly be plenty of disagreement about how specifically to fix the programs. Working them out is exactly what we should be doing in a democracy. But doing nothing should be the one thing we can agree should not be an option.

Each rescue committee would be evenly balanced, with six Democrats and six Republicans, three of each drawn from each chamber. Recommending legislation and enabling fast-track procedures for consideration would require a simple majority that includes at least two members of each party.

The commissions’ deadline to make proposals would be November 12, 2020, nine days after Election Day. That target date would allow the rescue committees to focus on their work without worrying about their products being caught up in campaign posturing. It would also provide enough time to consider the recommendations before the end of the congressional session.

Taking a note from the Select Committee on the Modernization of Congress, the rescue committees could propose legislation before the deadline. Members may decide that they have enough agreement, perhaps on relatively narrow reforms or even just technical corrections, that they’d rather try to get that piece done and keep working on other aspects.

If they succeed, these programs will be made financially stable, arbitrary cuts will be avoided and our politics will be healthier as the American people see that the parties can work together to advance the public interest. Fixing the structural imbalances in these programs and a few others would also substantially improve the federal government’s budget outlook. 

It is encouraging to see thoughtful statesmen of both parties focused on the important work that voters sent them to Congress to do. Seeking bipartisan solutions to serious problems and enacting them is a crucial remedy to heal our ailing political culture.

Maya MacGuineas is president of the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget.