DACA is neither bipartisan nor in America's interest

DACA is neither bipartisan nor in America's interest
© Getty Images

This week, a group of six pro-amnesty senators introduced a “bipartisan deal” to give amnesty to millions of so-called Dreamers and their illegal alien parents, while including absolutely zero tradeoffs requested by the White House and a majority of Republicans. Nothing to enhance border security. Nothing to increase interior enforcement or make necessary changes to our legal immigration system. President TrumpDonald John TrumpMcCabe says he was fired because he 'opened a case against' Trump McCabe: Trump said 'I don't care, I believe Putin' when confronted with US intel on North Korea McCabe: Trump talked to me about his election victory during 'bizarre' job interview MORE was right to swiftly reject an earlier version of this proposal last week.

The deal is a product of negotiations among the so-called “Gang of Six” — Republican Sens. Jeff FlakeJeffrey (Jeff) Lane FlakeTrump suggests Heller lost reelection bid because he was 'hostile' during 2016 presidential campaign Live coverage: Trump delivers State of the Union Sasse’s jabs at Trump spark talk of primary challenger MORE of Arizona, Lindsey GrahamLindsey Olin GrahamGraham: More urgent for kids in Kentucky to have secure border than new school 
 White House, GOP defend Trump emergency declaration Limbaugh calls 25th Amendment discussions 'silent coup' MORE of South Carolina, and Cory GardnerCory Scott GardnerBipartisan Senators reintroduce legislation to slap new sanctions on Russia Dems seeking path to Senate majority zero-in on Sun Belt Lawmakers eager for 5G breakthrough MORE of Colorado; and Democratic Sens. Dick DurbinRichard (Dick) Joseph DurbinTrump praises law enforcement response to shooting at Illinois business Five dead in shooting at manufacturing plant in Aurora, Illinois ‘Contingency’ spending in 3B budget deal comes under fire MORE of Illinois, Robert MenendezRobert (Bob) MenendezWilliam Barr is right man for the times This week: Trump delivers State of the Union amid wall fight BuzzFeed story has more to say about media than the president MORE of New Jersey, and Michael BennetMichael Farrand BennetDemocratic donors stuck in shopping phase of primary Overnight Health Care — Sponsored by America's 340B Hospitals — CDC blames e-cigs for rise in youth tobacco use | FDA cracks down on dietary supplements | More drug pricing hearings on tap The Hill's Morning Report - Presented by the American Academy of HIV Medicine - Next 24 hours critical for stalled funding talks MORE of Colorado.

Before diving into the details of this bad faith proposal, let’s establish a few things about these “negotiators” and their strategy. First, the notion that anything produced by the “Gang of Six” constitutes a bipartisan consensus is ludicrous. But even more ludicrous is the assertion that the product of these “negotiations” includes anything that protects the interests of the American people.

ADVERTISEMENT

Every member of the gang is unabashedly pro-amnesty, with five of the senators being former members of the 2013 “Gang of Eight.” So essentially you have one side of the immigration debate negotiating with itself. As Steven Duffield so aptly noted on Twitter, the deal is bipartisan in the way that a bill on coal production that includes Sen. Joe ManchinJoseph (Joe) ManchinSenate confirms Trump pick William Barr as new attorney general GOP wants to pit Ocasio-Cortez against Democrats in the Senate Senate poised to confirm Trump’s attorney general pick MORE (D-W.Va.) is bipartisan.

 

Second, “Gang of Six” leaders Durbin and Graham have made clear that they won’t even entertain any of the administration’s required tradeoffs for a DACA deal. Their goal in negotiations with the White House is simply to manipulate the president into abandoning his longstanding position on immigration and betray countless campaign promises. When they were unsuccessful last week, Durbin lamented that Trump’s Capitol Hill allies on immigration were invited to a meeting at the White House last week to “outnumber us and kill our efforts.” Graham then blasted White House staffers “who have an irrational view of how to fix immigration.” Essentially, they are unhappy about being unable to steamroll Trump and, more importantly, the American people, into accepting a massive amnesty for illegal aliens with no meaningful protections against future illegal immigration.

Now onto the proposal. The “Gang of Six” proposal’s amnesty provisions go far beyond DACA recipients in scope. The senators included the full DREAM Act, which would end up giving amnesty to nearly 3.5 million illegal aliens — many more than ever benefited under the DACA program. What about the parents who brought them here illegally? They get three-year renewable work permits as a reward for putting their children on a treacherous journey and crossing the border illegally. And that’s not all, the proposal adjusts the visa lottery as a way to provide amnesty for some 400,000 people who were granted Temporary Protected Status (some as long as 20 years ago), many of whom were here illegally at the time the triggering event in their homelands.

What do the American people get in return? Next to nothing. The proposal provides slightly under $1.6 billion for border wall planning, design, and construction, despite estimates by the Department of Homeland Security showing that construction could cost about $21.6 billion. In addition to the low ball offer, the proposal tacks on a bunch of conditions to even begin construction, including existing barrier technology requirements, eminent domain reporting, environmental protection reporting, controller general reviews, and alternate technology reporting. Looking for an end to chain migration, mandatory E-Verify, or increased interior enforcement? You won’t find it.

It is clear that the “Gang of Six” proposal is nothing more than a transparent attempt to grant amnesty to millions of illegal aliens while offering nothing that would prevent massive illegal immigration in the future. Perhaps the only redeeming feature of the legislation is its honesty: Its authors no longer even feel the need to lie to the American people about their intent to enforce our immigration laws. 

The president has already made a very significant concession in even expressing a willingness to address DACA — an unconstitutional program he pledged to rescind on his first day in office. Until the “Gang of Six” acknowledges that and starts operating in good faith, Sen. Tom CottonThomas (Tom) Bryant CottonSenate approves border bill that prevents shutdown 'Morning Joe' host quizzes Howard Schultz on price of a box of Cheerios Huawei charges escalate Trump fight with China MORE (R-Ark.) has the best approach for their proposal: “Might as well roll it straight into the trash can.”

RJ Hauman is director of government relations at the Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR), a nonprofit group that advocates for legal immigration.