Democrats will fail if they portray William Barr as controversial pick

Vilifying William Barr, the nominee for attorney general, as they have done with every appointee of President TrumpDonald John TrumpWarren: 'White supremacists pose a threat to the United States like any other terrorist group' National Enquirer paid 0,000 for Bezos texts: report Santorum: Trump should 'send emails to a therapist' instead of tweeting MORE, will only backfire on Democrats.

In November 1991, a Senate with 57 Democrats in the majority confirmed Barr as attorney general of the United States on a voice vote, meaning there were no objections. Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Joseph Biden even praised the candidness shown by Barr as “a throwback to the days when we actually had attorneys general that would talk to you.”

But now Donald Trump is president, meaning that left wing Democrats will likely try to portray the attorney general under George H.W. Bush as a controversial figure in order appease their “resistance” base. That strategy ultimately failed when Democrats were trying to derail the confirmation of Brett KavanaughBrett Michael KavanaughWarren, Harris, Gillibrand back efforts to add justices to Supreme Court Pence traveling to SC for Graham reelection launch Georgia's heartbeat abortion bill is dangerous for women nationwide MORE to the Supreme Court. It certainly will not work now.

ADVERTISEMENT

Even Patrick LeahyPatrick Joseph LeahyPatrick Leahy sits at center of partisan judicial nominations Schwarzenegger blasts Trump budget for taking money from 'poor little kids' Democratic appropriators demand list of military projects that would be defunded for wall MORE, now the longest serving Democrat in the Senate, voted to confirm Barr 27 years ago. Dianne FeinsteinDianne Emiel FeinsteinDems request probe into spa owner suspected of trying to sell access to Trump Overnight Health Care — Presented by PCMA — FDA issues proposal to limit sales of flavored e-cigs | Trump health chief gets grilling | Divisions emerge over House drug pricing bills | Dems launch investigation into short-term health plans The Hill's Morning Report - Boeing crisis a test for Trump administration MORE, who is the ranking Democrat on the Senate Judiciary Committee, served during much of his tenure. Perhaps fearing a repeat of the Kavanaugh fiasco, both have refused to help get the ball rolling on an attempt to block Barr. Feinstein refused to condemn Barr when CNN came calling. Leahy went further, telling the Washington Examiner that Barr is someone he respects and who could “have majority support from Republicans and Democrats.”

The reason experienced Democrats in Congress are so reluctant to get the outrage machine up and running is that Barr enjoys a reputation as a consummate attorney and a widely respected public servant. He earned two degrees from Columbia University before graduating from George Washington University Law School with highest honors. Barr served with distinction in the public and private sectors for more than 40 years.

Barr began his career in the intelligence community. As an attorney, he made a name for himself as an adviser to Ronald Reagan and then worked for an eminent Washington law firm before President Bush asked him to return to public service in 1989. In an administration packed with talent, Barr so distinguished himself as head of the Office of Legal Counsel, one of the most notoriously nuanced and difficult positions at the Justice Department, that President Bush nominated him as deputy attorney general, then soon after as attorney general of the United States.

This decision by President Bush to replace an appointee of President Reagan with one of the youngest attorneys general in the modern era, along with the Senate decision to confirm him on a voice vote, speaks volumes. As the nation laid President Bush to rest earlier this month, we were reminded of a bygone era in American politics, when competence and character in civil servants were the first priority of both parties. Barr had bipartisan support in that era because he embodies those qualities.

The esteem in which lawmakers on both sides of the aisle held Barr was validated by his successful tenure at the Justice Department. It was under his watch that the nation finally turned the corner on the nightmare of violent crime that plagued our cities in the 1970s and 1980s. It was his leadership that oversaw implementation of two cornerstone laws, the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 and the Civil Rights Act of 1991.

In the absence of any substantive objection to his solid record, liberal commentators have seized upon his views of executive power in an effort to tarnish his reputation. His views, however, are indeed mainstream and uncontroversial. His legal opinions from his tenure as attorney general were never repudiated by any subsequent administration. Democrats and “resistance” pundits have proven they are willing to turn any nomination by President Trump into a partisan circus. If they try it with Barr, it will not work and their own history of praise for him will come back to haunt them.

Madison Gesiotto is an attorney and commentator who serves with the advisory board of the Donald Trump campaign. She was an inauguration spokesperson and former Miss Ohio. She is on Twitter @MadisonGesiotto.