Juan Williams: Time for Justice Breyer to go

Juan Williams: Time for Justice Breyer to go
© Getty Images

How political is today’s Supreme Court?

The website FiveThirtyEight has described the high court as “the most conservative it’s been in 70 years.”

In purely political terms, a statistical analysis published in The Washington Post comes to the same bottom-line. The current 6-3 conservative majority on the court makes it “more conservative than the elected branches [House, Senate and presidency — all controlled by Democrats] to a degree not seen in 70 years.”

ADVERTISEMENT

The out-of-balance scales of Supreme Court justice can be traced to the heavy hand of Senate Republicans.

First, they prevented President Obama from putting a nominee on the court for nearly a year.

Those same Senate Republicans then quickly confirmed three justices named by President TrumpDonald TrumpTrump hails Arizona Senate for audit at Phoenix rally, slams governor Arkansas governor says it's 'disappointing' vaccinations have become 'political' Watch live: Trump attends rally in Phoenix MORE.

By the way, those Senate Republicans “represented fewer Americans than did the Democrats who were opposed,” David Von Drehle, a Post columnist, noted last week.

If there is any doubt about how politicized the court has become, well, listen to a Supreme Court Justice doing a public audition for a right-wing talk radio gig.

Serving up conservative grievance while bragging in the ‘I-Told-You-So,’ style of the late talk-radio king Rush Limbaugh, Justice Samuel AlitoSamuel AlitoNo reason to pack the court Justice or just desserts? Trump, Cosby and Georgia cases show rising cost of political litigation House Democrats introduce bill restoring voting provision after SCOTUS ruling MORE said he rightly predicted in a recent court dissent that opponents to gay marriage would be labeled “bigots."

Alito even echoed right-wing complaints about Cancel Culture by saying free speech is “falling out of favor in some circles.”

“That is just what is coming to pass,” Alito told the conservative Federalist Society last November, publicly criticizing his fellow justices’ decision to allow gay people to marry.

Alito had nothing to say about the damage done by years of denial of equal rights and ongoing bias against gay Americans.

Despite such moments, 49 percent of Americans still have “a great deal” or “fair amount” of confidence in the court’s rulings, according to an April Reuters/Ipos poll.

But Americans do have concerns about what is happening to the court. The poll found nearly two-thirds of Americans, 63 percent, now want term limits or age limits on the justices. And more than a third, 38 percent, are open to restoring balance to the court by expanding the number of justices on its bench by four.

Concern over the ideological imbalance on the court prompted House Democrats to introduce legislation in April to expand the court from nine to 13 members.

“We are here today because the United States Supreme Court is broken…out of balance and it needs to be fixed,” Sen. Ed MarkeyEd MarkeyEquilibrium/ Sustainability — Presented by NextEra Energy — Olympics medals made of mashed up smartphones Lawmakers urge Biden to make 'bold decisions' in nuclear review OVERNIGHT ENERGY: Democrats lay out vision for Civilian Climate Corps | Manchin to back controversial public lands nominee | White House details environmental justice plan MORE (D-Mass.) said while speaking at a news conference outside the court.

“We are not packing the Supreme Court, we are unpacking it,” said House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerrold NadlerJerrold (Jerry) Lewis NadlerHere's what Congress is reading at the beach this summer Activists see momentum as three new states legalize marijuana Supreme Court expansion push starts to fizzle MORE (D-N.Y.), who co-sponsored the bill.

The House bill has little chance. Speaker Nancy PelosiNancy PelosiSunday shows preview: Bipartisan infrastructure talks drag on; Democrats plow ahead with Jan. 6 probe House Democrats grow frustrated as they feel ignored by Senate Yellen to Congress: Raise the debt ceiling or risk 'irreparable harm' MORE (D-Calif.) has said she has no plans to call for a vote. It has even less chance in the Senate, with Democrats lacking the votes to overcome a GOP filibuster.

Last week, President BidenJoe BidenTrump hails Arizona Senate for audit at Phoenix rally, slams governor Republicans focus tax hike opposition on capital gains change Biden on hecklers: 'This is not a Trump rally. Let 'em holler' MORE’s commission on Supreme Court reform met for the first time. The commission’s task is to “provide an analysis” of possible reforms, according to the White House, although it is not expected to make actual recommendations.

In any case, the commission will not act in time to deal with urgent cases. Last week the court announced it will hear a case challenging Mississippi’s 15-week abortion ban. It is the clearest challenge in decades to the constitutionality of Roe v. Wade and a woman’s right to decide on having an abortion.

The court previously rejected similar state laws because the justices regarded Roe v. Wade as settled law.

Now, with Trump’s most recent addition to the court, Justice Amy Coney BarrettAmy Coney BarrettAbortion rights face most difficult test yet at Supreme Court Overnight Health Care: Biden officials says no change to masking guidance right now | Missouri Supreme Court rules in favor of Medicaid expansion | Mississippi's attorney general asks Supreme Court to overturn Roe v. Wade Mississippi's attorney general asks Supreme Court to overturn Roe v. Wade MORE, a religious conservative with a record of hostility to abortion rights, the court has agreed to hear the Mississippi case.

There isn’t much the majority of Americans who support abortion rights can do to stop the current court from uprooting those rights.

The realistic fight is to keep the current imbalance on the court from getting worse.

ADVERTISEMENT

That begins with nudging Justice Stephen BreyerStephen BreyerSenate panel votes to make women register for draft Biden's belated filibuster decision: A pretense of principle at work Klobuchar: If Breyer is going to retire from Supreme Court, it should be sooner rather than later MORE, one of the three remaining Democratic nominees on the court, to retire now.

Breyer is 82 years old. If he leaves the court now, he will be replaced by a Biden nominee who would likely be confirmed with the votes of 50 Democrats in the Senate aided by the tie-breaking vote of Vice President Harris.

Justices Thurgood Marshall and Ruth Bader GinsburgRuth Bader GinsburgAbortion rights face most difficult test yet at Supreme Court Mississippi's attorney general asks Supreme Court to overturn Roe v. Wade 10 books that take readers inside the lives of American leaders MORE, both nominated by Democrats, were both replaced by Republican nominees because they chose not to pay attention to the threat of a politicized court.

Last week, Biden put forward his third slate of judicial nominations — bringing his total as president to 20 nominees for federal judgeships. 

Trump in his single term won confirmation for 226 of his federal judicial nominees — including the three Supreme Court Justices.

With the very real possibility that he could lose the Democrats’ Senate Majority next year — owing largely to those GOP voter suppression laws made possible by the Court — Biden has a limited opening to wrest back the balance of power on the Courts from the conservatives and give liberals a fighting chance for equal justice in the decades to come.

It is Biden as much as Breyer whom history will judge in this moment of supreme political consequence.  

Juan Williams is an author, and a political analyst for Fox News Channel.