FEATURED:

Lanny Davis: Clinton-Sanders: A new majority coalition

Lanny Davis: Clinton-Sanders: A new majority coalition
© Getty Images

After Sen. Bernie SandersBernard (Bernie) SandersTrump attacks ‘Crazy Bernie’ Sanders over Medicare plans Overnight Defense: Trump says 'rogue killers' could be behind missing journalist | Sends Pompeo to meet Saudi king | Saudis may claim Khashoggi killed by accident | Ex-VA chief talks White House 'chaos' | Most F-35s cleared for flight Overnight Energy: Trump administration doubles down on climate skepticism | Suspended EPA health official hits back | Military bases could host coal, gas exports MORE’s (I-Vt.) narrow victory in Michigan Tuesday, preceded by vigorous debates and competition, it might appear that Sanders and Hillary ClintonHillary Diane Rodham ClintonCarter Page files defamation lawsuit against DNC Dems fear party is headed to gutter from Avenatti’s sledgehammer approach Election Countdown: Cruz, O'Rourke fight at pivotal point | Ryan hitting the trail for vulnerable Republicans | Poll shows Biden leading Dem 2020 field | Arizona Senate debate tonight MORE are about to begin a more divisive campaign for the presidency in the coming months. 

I beg to differ. 

ADVERTISEMENT

I expect, instead, a campaign, while intense and competitive, that will result in a historic political realignment in America, with a united Democratic Party in a position to create a new majority coalition for years to come. 

These two Democratic candidates have more in common than meets the eye. I submit that Clinton and Sanders agree on the following five core principles that collectively represent a new ideological hybrid, one that polling data prove constitute a majority of today’s voters in both parties.

Government as a solution, but not the only one, to America’s problems: This includes reducing today’s severe income disparities with tax cuts for the middle class and tax increases for the wealthy; increasing the minimum wage; guaranteed universal healthcare; environmental and clean energy measures to reverse global warming before it is too late; insistence on fair trade if there is to be free trade with foreign nations; comprehensive immigration reform guaranteeing a pathway to citizenship over time for eligible undocumented workers; and massive government investment in the decaying infrastructure.

A strong private sector as the engine of economic growth and job creation: This includes encouraging private-sector growth, especially small business, but accompanied by reasonable regulations; ensuring that no bank or corporation is too big to fail with executives who are too powerful to go to jail; and a constitutional amendment overturning the Supreme Court decision in Citizens United, explicitly preventing powerful corporate interests and the super-wealthy from corrupting our political process with secret, unaccountable campaign donations.

Protection of individual liberties and privacy rights from excessive invasion by government: This includes protection of religious individual liberty; the right of a woman to choose concerning termination of a pregnancy; protection from unreasonable government intrusion on privacy rights, while still allowing the courts to supervise and permit protective measures against terrorism; and protecting the constitutional right of private gun ownership while allowing for common-sense regulations and background checks. 

Restraint in U.S. foreign military interventions: This includes opposing the U.S. unilaterally acting as the world’s policeman and “nation builder” for democracies, thus avoiding any unilateral U.S. military intervention except as a last resort to protect risks to American security — and only after consultation and, if possible, approval by Congress.

Civility and bipartisan solutions in Washington: This includes a commitment to civility in Washington, to disagree agreeably and to seek common ground and bipartisan, fact-based solutions between the two parties. This may be the most important demand of most voters across the political spectrum; the contrast in the Donald TrumpDonald John TrumpKey takeaways from the Arizona Senate debate Major Hollywood talent firm considering rejecting Saudi investment money: report Mattis says he thought 'nothing at all' about Trump saying he may leave administration MORE/Ted CruzRafael (Ted) Edward CruzBeto O'Rourke will not share million he raised with other Dem Senate candidates Election Countdown: Cruz, O'Rourke fight at pivotal point | Ryan hitting the trail for vulnerable Republicans | Poll shows Biden leading Dem 2020 field | Arizona Senate debate tonight Donald Trump Jr. blasts Beto O’Rourke: ‘Irish guy pretending to be Hispanic’ MORE/Marco RubioMarco Antonio RubioDating app for Trump supporters leaked its users data on launch day: report Overnight Defense: Trump says 'rogue killers' could be behind missing journalist | Sends Pompeo to meet Saudi king | Saudis may claim Khashoggi killed by accident | Ex-VA chief talks White House 'chaos' | Most F-35s cleared for flight Democrats torch Trump for floating 'rogue killers' to blame for missing journalist MORE food fight and repulsive nastiness is another reason for this.

Reviewing these five principles together — belief in government, belief in the private sector, belief in protecting individual liberty and privacy rights, restraint in U.S. intervention and military engagements abroad, and bipartisanship and civility in government — I believe Clinton and Sanders agree on virtually all of them. (Full disclosure: I believe Clinton’s experience and qualifications and ability to get things done in Washington would make her the far superior nominee for the Democratic Party.)

In 1932, Franklin Delano Roosevelt created the New Deal, based on a philosophy that a strong federal government was needed to get America out of the Great Depression. From 1992 to 2001, the New Democrat philosophy of Bill ClintonWilliam (Bill) Jefferson ClintonCybersecurity for national defense: How many 'wake-up calls' does it take? Who's in control alters our opinion of how things are Obama adviser jabs Hillary Clinton over Monica Lewinsky comments MORE combined FDR’s belief in government with policies that spurred the private sector to help create 23 million new jobs. From 2008 to 2016, Barack ObamaBarack Hussein ObamaChance the Rapper works as Lyft driver to raise money for Chicago schools Americans are safer from terrorism, but new threats are arising Donald Trump Jr. emerges as GOP fundraising force MORE continued former President Clinton’s economic success of record numbers of new jobs created on the heels of a severe economic crisis, and — finally — in partnership with a Democratic Congress, created a healthcare program that can lead to universal healthcare protection for all Americans.

Now, in 2016, if the Democratic Party candidate runs on a platform endorsing most or all of these five principles that combine elements that span the political spectrum, as I believe will be the case, I have little to no doubt that on Jan. 20, 2017, the new Democratic Party president will lead a new governing majority coalition for years to come. 

Lanny Davis served as special counsel to former President Bill Clinton and is principal in the Washington, D.C., law firm of Lanny J. Davis & Associates, and executive vice president of the strategic communications firm LEVICK. He is the author of “Crisis Tales: Five Rules for Coping with Crises in Business, Politics, and Life.”