By Markos Moulitsas - 03/25/14 06:11 PM EDT
Republicans are certainly optimistic about their 2014 Senate chances. Between good candidate recruitment, President Obama’s low approval numbers and lingering uncertainty about the Affordable Care Act, Republicans like the looks of November’s elections, and many are openly talking about taking the majority.
Yet even if the GOP’s 2014 Senate dreams come true, they won’t have more than a two-year rental on the chamber.
But in 2016, Republicans will have to defend their 2010 landslide victory and will face presidential-year turnout, which is demonstrably more liberal than midterm turnout, as well as the possibility of a popular Hillary ClintonHillary Rodham ClintonTrump says Merkel 'great' leader, is 'disappointed' in refugee position Overnight Tech: Wheeler says box vote a question of timing | Dems push back against ICANN suit | Waze rolls out ride-hail Overnight Cybersecurity: Report - Trump briefed Russia behind DNC hacks before saying they might not be MORE at the top of the ballot.
The Democrats who survived 2010 are near indestructible. Republicans might try to nominate someone sane to take on Senate Majority Leader Harry ReidHarry ReidNo GOP leaders attending Shimon Peres funeral Overnight Regulation: Feds finalize rule expanding sick leave Anti-trade senators say chamber would be crazy to pass TPP MORE (unlike 2010’s Sharron Angle), but no other Democrat appears even remotely endangered.
But the GOP vulnerabilities are legion.
Republicans will have to defend freshman senators in the blue states of Illinois, New Hampshire, Ohio, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin (where former Sen. Russ Feingold is rumored to be gearing up to fight for his old seat), as well as the purple state of North Carolina. Longtime Iowa Republican Sen. Chuck GrassleyChuck GrassleyMcConnell blames dysfunction on Dems Four states sue to stop internet transition Senate passes bill to preserve sexual assault kits MORE will be 82, and a retirement would give Democrats another major pickup opportunity.
Arizona Sen. John McCainJohn McCainKerry: US 'on the verge' of suspending talks with Russia on Syria Trump, Clinton to headline Al Smith dinner Overnight Defense: Congress overrides Obama 9/11 veto | Pentagon breathes easy after funding deal | More troops heading to Iraq MORE will be 80 on Election Day 2016, but Democrats will likely root for him not to retire. Polling shows that he is currently the most unpopular senator in the country. Meanwhile, Florida freshman Sen. Marco RubioMarco RubioOvernight Finance: Lawmakers call for criminal charges for Wells Fargo chief | Ryan sees recession without tax reform | Aide defends Trump Cuba deals The Trail 2016: Just a little kick Opposition to Obama's radical disarmament agenda has proven effective MORE won’t just be distracted with a presidential bid; he’ll be battling net-negative approval ratings as well.
That’s already nine seats, and we haven’t even accounted for the Tea Party effect on the race. In the last two cycles, Tea Party candidates cost the GOP at least six seats: in Colorado (Ken Buck), Connecticut (Linda McMahon), Delaware (Christine O’Donnell), Indiana (Richard Mourdock), Missouri (Todd Akin) and Nevada (Angle). In other words, Republicans might already have the majority if it hadn’t been for their crazy base. Already, their negative influence is being felt this year, giving Democrats unexpected opportunities in Georgia and Kentucky.
Any successes in 2014 will only embolden the Tea Party crowd, forcing Republican incumbents to veer hard to the right in order to head off a primary, spurring early retirements (like Georgia’s Saxby ChamblissSaxby ChamblissWyden hammers CIA chief over Senate spying Cruz is a liability Inside Paul Ryan’s brain trust MORE this year) or generating the kind of divisive (and sometimes victorious) primary challenges that gifted Indiana to the Democrats in 2012.
The 2016 map gives Republicans added impetus this year: pick up enough seats, and perhaps they can hold off the inevitable Democratic clawback two years later. On the Democratic side, holding the Senate, even by a sliver, would mean a real shot at a filibuster-proof majority in 2016. And while the filibuster may be on life support, the symbolism of a super-majority still has value.
The Republican Party’s chances aren’t as good as its members think this year — don’t forget that the party was just as optimistic heading into the 2012 contest, which featured a map that was nearly as GOP-friendly as this year’s. But even if their greatest dreams come true this fall, 2016 and the Clinton juggernaut loom just around the corner.
Moulitsas is the founder and publisher of Daily Kos.