The enigmatic case of Carter Page
Anyway, Page has said his verbal jab at the FBI over the Boston Marathon bombing ignited a retaliatory campaign against him. (The bureau moved to wiretap Page just a few months after McCabe was promoted to FBI deputy director in 2016.)
Page had other FBI ties. It’s been reported that Page actually assisted the FBI in a case of Russian corporate espionage several years ago. The Russian spy was Evgeny Buryakov who pleaded guilty in March 2016. The same month, Page became a Trump adviser and the FBI interviewed him again.
So if the FBI’s theory is correct, Page reportedly assisted in catching a Russian spy and then, right after the ink was dry on the case, was so bold as to become a Russian spy himself, even as the FBI was interviewing him. Pretty audacious — but anything is possible.
The theory became public and gained traction when Yahoo News published an article about Page’s Moscow ties, as if it all was suspicious: He’d travelled to Russia, held business meetings, met with Russian officials, represented Russia’s government. None of the revelations were necessarily against the law or different than the activities of thousands of Americans. But the leaks to the press shrouded Page in a cloud of innuendo and suspicion.
Amid the controversy, Page left the Trump campaign in September 2016 and penned a letter to then-FBI Director James Comey objecting to being the target of a “witch hunt.” According to internal emails, that only emboldened anti-Trump FBI agents who planned to request a secret wiretap against Page just four weeks before election day.
On Oct. 21, 2016, the wiretap was approved based on “evidence” including the Yahoo news article and parts of an anti-Trump “dossier.” The dossier turned out to be unverified political opposition research compiled by a foreign ex-spy whose sources were supposedly Russian, and the dossier was funded by the Clinton campaign and the Democratic Party. But none of that was publicly known at the time.
The FBI seemed extremely sensitive to the bad optics earlier this year when it was forced to reveal it had wiretapped someone in an active presidential campaign. A narrative was promptly dispatched to address that. It was widely claimed that the FBI took no interest in wiretapping Page until he’d left the Trump campaign, therefore the motivations couldn’t have been political.
However, that claim proved false.
The FBI actually first applied to wiretap Page in July 2016 while he was very much active in the Trump campaign. In fact, according to a report in The Guardian, in the summer of 2016 the FBI actually attempted to obtain a secret court order to “monitor four members of the Trump team.” But the court rejected the applications and asked the FBI to narrow its focus.
Once the Page wiretap was finally approved in October 2016, with help from the “dossier,” that wasn’t the end. The FBI went back to the court to extend the surveillance. In January 2017. In April 2017, under President Trump. And in July 2017. In all, four wiretaps were approved by three different judges, and signed by FBI Director Comey, Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates, Acting Attorney General Dana Boente, Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein and FBI Deputy Director McCabe.
For nearly a year, the FBI watched Page and his communications. This would have included phone calls, email, text messages, verbal meetings, social media, internet activity, photos, personal travel, financial activities. Everything he said or wrote to colleagues, friends and family.
Page is either the slickest foreign spy to ever walk the planet, or he’s not a spy at all.
Or maybe special counsel Robert Mueller has found new evidence that eluded the FBI and we will soon learn of it.
If not, would someone owe him an apology?
Sharyl Attkisson (@
The Hill has removed its comment section, as there are many other forums for readers to participate in the conversation. We invite you to join the discussion on Facebook and Twitter.