Don't underestimate the power of nationwide outrage born from financial desperation

Don't underestimate the power of nationwide outrage born from financial desperation
© Greg Nash

The longest government shutdown in U.S. history is a battle between two immovable objects: Donald TrumpDonald John TrumpHouse Dems demand Barr cancel 'inappropriate' press conference on Mueller report DOJ plans to release 'lightly redacted' version of Mueller report Thursday: WaPo Nadler accuses Barr of 'unprecedented steps' to 'spin' Mueller report MORE and congressional Democrats. Trump understands his base will fracture if he relents on building a wall along the southern border. And Democrats understand they will fracture if they surrender to Trump in their first post-midterm test against a previously unchecked president.

The ace in Trump’s back pocket  — declaring a national emergency  — risks getting tied up in the courts, which helps explain why he hasn’t yet played this card: doing so would almost assuredly bring the shutdown to a swift halt. By delaying his declaration, Trump hopes the deepening pain of the shutdown will put greater pressure on, principally, House Speaker Nancy PelosiNancy Patricia D'Alesandro PelosiDOJ plans to release 'lightly redacted' version of Mueller report Thursday: WaPo Pelosi accuses Barr of 'single-minded effort' to protect Trump against Mueller report Dems attack Barr's credibility after report of White House briefings on Mueller findings MORE (D-Calif.) to make a deal.

ADVERTISEMENT
But congressional Democrats have their own ace, though playing it requires a heckuva lot more skill and patience. Still, this unplayed card could be our only way out of this mess.

Democrats’ last, best hope is to assemble a veto-proof congressional coalition to fund the rest of the government. That means two-thirds support in the House (290 votes) and two-thirds support in the Senate (67 votes). At first glance, this seems nearly impossible, as Democrats would need 55 GOP votes in the House and 20 GOP votes in the Senate. They would also need Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnellAddison (Mitch) Mitchell McConnellThe Hill's 12:30 Report: Trump, Dems prep for Mueller report's release McConnell touts Trump support, Supreme Court fights in reelection video Why Ken Cuccinelli should be Trump's choice for DHS MORE (R-Ky.) to bring such legislation up for a vote  — twice: once in the first phase and then again after Trump vetoes it.

However, a carefully orchestrated effort to mobilize politically frightened and vulnerable Republicans could prove successful, because currently the GOP is losing this fight. A Washington Post — ABC News poll released Sunday shows 53 percent of respondents blame Trump and congressional Republicans for the shutdown, while only 29 percent blame congressional Democrats. The longer this shutdown goes, the more damaging it will be to the country. While the 2020 election is nearly two years away, the shutdown is the type of earth-shattering national event that voters won’t forget in 20 months. And, regardless, Democrats won’t let them forget.

Which means even moderately vulnerable Republicans up for re-election will face a stark choice: Be part of the problem or part of the solution.

The Democrats’ solution would entail luring 55 House Republicans to finish funding the government. It would be a grand statement intended to shock vulnerable Senate Republicans into submission, thereby weakening McConnell’s seemingly unyielding grip on the legislative calendar.

Where will these 55 GOP votes come from? Well, in the 2018 midterms, 58 Republicans prevailed by 11 percent or less versus their Democratic rivals and just more than half of these 58 won by 5.5 percent or less. As soon as today, Democrats could begin pressuring these 58 members to abandon Trump before Trump abandons them  — knowing that opposing government funding could be politically catastrophic for these mostly purple-district Republicans.

Securing 20 Republican Senate votes seems more far fetched. Who, besides perhaps Susan CollinsSusan Margaret CollinsOvernight Energy: Collins receives more donations from Texas oil, gas industry than from Maine residents | Interior chief left meetings off schedule | Omar controversy jeopardizes Ocasio-Cortez trip to coal mine Embattled senators fill coffers ahead of 2020 Collins receives more donations from Texas fossil fuel industry than from Maine residents MORE (R-Maine) and Lisa MurkowskiLisa Ann MurkowskiCain says he won't back down, wants to be nominated to Fed License to discriminate: Religious exemption laws are trampling rights in rural America On The Money — Presented by Job Creators Network — Cain expected to withdraw from Fed consideration, report says | Dem bill directs IRS to create free online filing service | Trump considered Ivanka for World Bank MORE (R-Alaska), could be expected to buck their president on what surely will be viewed as a litmus test for party loyalty?

But this party is facing extraordinary political headwinds on a number of fronts. For starters, they must defend 22 out of 34 Senate seats in 2020. The bigger story, however, is Trump’s growing unpopularity in many of these states. A recent t gives Trump net negative approval ratings in nine states he won in 2016: Florida (-3), Georgia (-3), North Carolina (-3), Ohio (-3), Pennsylvania (-6), Arizona (-7), Iowa (-10), Wisconsin (-12) and Michigan (-12). It’s an extraordinary reality for a president who desperately needs to win eight of these nine states next November.

It also spells trouble for swing-state Republicans whose electoral fortunes increasingly could hinge on an unpopular president. Three GOP-held seats at play in 2020 are among these nine. Another four are in states that barely support Trump (+2 to +4 net approval). And another three are in states Trump lost in 2016.

Looking ahead to 2022, 11 more GOP seats fall into one of these three groups: net-negative Trump approval, barely positive Trump approval, or states Trump lost in the last presidential election.

That makes 21 semi- to highly vulnerable Republican senators. Democrats need to pick off 20 to guarantee a veto-proof majority.

While unlikely given today’s political climate, this approach could yield success if the shutdown leads to more economically and politically catastrophic scenarios: the nation losing its triple-A bond rating, the stock market in free fall and the ripple effect of millions of Americans going unpaid for weeks or even months.

Do not underestimate the power of nationwide outrage born from financial desperation. And when that outrage is directed primarily at one party, political survival becomes the greatest motivator  — in this case, a large minority of anxious Republicans abandoning the wall and thereby the president, to restore order to the republic.

B.J. Rudell is associate director of POLIS: Duke University’s Center for Political Leadership, Innovation and Service. His nearly 25-year career has included stints on Capitol Hill, on a presidential campaign, in a newsroom, in classrooms and for a consulting firm. He has authored three books and has shared political insights on CNN, Fox News and dozens of radio stations across the country.