The Senate should host the State of the Union

House Speaker Nancy PelosiNancy Patricia D'Alesandro PelosiNational emergency declaration — a legal fight Trump is likely to win Congress allows Violence Against Women Act to lapse High stakes as Trump, Dems open drug price talks MORE (D-Calif.) has suggested delaying or scrapping the annual State of the Union address by the president of the United States to a joint session of Congress and that, instead of delivering the address in person, President TrumpDonald John TrumpGillibrand backs federal classification of third gender: report Former Carter pollster, Bannon ally Patrick Caddell dies at 68 Heather Nauert withdraws her name from consideration for UN Ambassador job MORE send a written report. Pelosi alleges security concerns and hasn’t filed a concurrent resolution to set Jan. 29 as the day for his speech.

Let’s call this The Pelosi Shutdown, or The Pelosi Snub, or The Pelosi Snub-down.

ADVERTISEMENT

No matter how ludicrous Pelosi’s pretext… er, reason, Trump should agree immediately, and then, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnellAddison (Mitch) Mitchell McConnellDems ready aggressive response to Trump emergency order, as GOP splinters Green New Deal Resolution invites big picture governing ‘Contingency’ spending in 3B budget deal comes under fire MORE (R-Ky.) should step in with an invitation for Trump to deliver an address in the Senate chamber.

Of course, the Senate chamber cannot accommodate all 535 members of Congress. That’s the point. Inadequate capacity would present not a complication so much as a perfect opportunity to improve upon the event. Absent Pelosi and her most ardent followers (recall last year’s phalanx of black-garbed, stone-faced women sitting on their hands), if not absent the entire Democratic congressional delegation, the event would be improved upon greatly.

It is common wisdom that a small, oversubscribed event is infinitely more compelling than an address to a cavernous, partly empty hall, as the traditional arrangement in the House would be if Democrats were to boycott the event (as many did in 2018).

Pelosi may think she has outfoxed Trump, since the president traditionally delivers his SOTU address in Congress, in response to resolutions passed by each chamber. Surely, the Senate could invite the president to deliver an address in its chamber at any time for any reason. It might not be called the SOTU, but a rose by any other name would smell the same.

It would be yet another opportunity for Trump to demonstrate that he’s in Washington to get things done, not stand on ceremony.

McConnell should invite members of the House as a courtesy — on a first come, first served basis. Presumably the House GOP would snap up the available seats (no doubt the Senate chamber has a maximum capacity mandated by a fire marshal with jurisdiction). McConnell should suggest that he would be happy to arrange a closed-circuit TV feed for the House chamber, which would have plenty of overflow seating capacity, or any other venue of the Democrats’ choosing. In the Senate chamber, GOP senators should yield the best seats to Supreme Court justices.

The advantages of this plan are multitudinous. Trump would turn the indignity that Pelosi intends to visit upon him into one that Democrats would suffer. He would deliver his address to a standing-room-only gathering composed of almost universally supportive attendees — all right, maybe not Sen. Mitt Romney (R-Utah) — and televised to the nation in prime time.

The president might open his remarks by announcing the delivery of his SOTU report to Congress, in the written format requested by Pelosi. At that point, Senate pages could distribute the report inside the chamber. Trump could say the report was being delivered to the offices of non-present members contemporaneously.

The Democrats, in contrast, would look foolish wherever they assembled, if they even did. Who would deliver their response? Would Pelosi and Sen. Chuck SchumerCharles (Chuck) Ellis SchumerNational emergency declaration — a legal fight Trump is likely to win House Judiciary Dems seek answers over Trump's national emergency declaration Mandatory E-Verify: The other border wall MORE (D-N.Y.) reprise their recent “American Gothic” performance? Would Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-CortezAlexandria Ocasio-CortezGOP senator voices concern about Trump order, hasn't decided whether he'll back it Ocasio-Cortez in Bronx speech: New Yorkers deserve ‘dignified jobs’ Amazon exec invites Ocasio-Cortez to tour facilities after criticism MORE (D-N.Y.) deliver an introductory course in socialism (absent any evidence of how socialism is working out in Venezuela)? Or, would the Democrats say nothing at all?

Finally, once having assumed the hosting of the event, McConnell should not relinquish it, leaving Pelosi no path of retreat.

If anyone wonders what’s happened to comity and decorum in the nation’s capital, they need look no further than this attempted Pelosi Snub-down — call it what you will — and the Democrats’ boycott of Trump’s inauguration ceremony. They are not shutting down raucous Trump rallies, but rather, the most solemn exercises of American democracy. America’s uninterrupted 200-year-plus record of the peaceful transfer of power is a beacon of freedom, which Democrats, led by Pelosi, have dimmed markedly.

This is about the office, not the man. Democrats have lost respect for the office of the presidency in their anti-Trump hysteria.

Red Jahncke is president of Townsend Group International, a business consultancy headquartered in Connecticut. Follow him on Twitter @RedJahncke.