Senate panel advances Trump nominee who wouldn't say if Brown v. Board of Education was decided correctly

Senate panel advances Trump nominee who wouldn't say if Brown v. Board of Education was decided correctly
© Getty Images

The Senate Judiciary Committee on Thursday approved a judicial nominee who faced criticism for declining to say whether the Supreme Court correctly decided a landmark case that outlawed racial segregation in schools.

Wendy Vitter, President TrumpDonald John TrumpNew Bob Woodward book will include details of 25 personal letters between Trump and Kim Jong Un On The Money: Pelosi, Mnuchin talk but make no progress on ending stalemate | Trump grabs 'third rail' of politics with payroll tax pause | Trump uses racist tropes to pitch fair housing repeal to 'suburban housewife' Biden commemorates anniversary of Charlottesville 'Unite the Right' rally: 'We are in a battle for the soul of our nation' MORE’s pick to serve as a federal judge for the Eastern District of Louisiana, was approved by an 11-10 party line committee vote, according to Her nomination will now go to the full Senate.

Vitter drew national attention for her testimony to the committee in April. Questioned by Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.) on whether Brown v. Board of Education was correctly decided in 1954, Vitter would not give a straightforward answer.


“Senator, I don’t mean to be coy, but I think I get into a difficult area when I start commenting on Supreme Court decisions — which are correctly decided and which I may disagree with,” Vitter said.

Later in the April hearing, Sen. John KennedyJohn Neely KennedyMORE (R-La.) further pressed Vitter, asking whether she agrees that segregating schools by race is immoral. Vitter agreed that it was.

Vitter is the general counsel for the Roman Catholic Church of the Archdiocese of New Orleans and has also worked in the district attorney's office in New Orleans. She left the legal profession for a time to help run campaigns for her husband, former Sen. David VitterDavid Bruce VitterBottom line Bottom line The biggest political upsets of the decade MORE (R-La.), according to NPR.

Sen. Kamala HarrisKamala HarrisCandidates on Biden's VP list were asked what they thought Trump would nickname them as part of process: report Bass on filling Harris's Senate spot: 'I'll keep all my options open' Election security advocates see strong ally in Harris MORE (D-Calif.) slammed the Senate Judiciary Committee’s vote on Thursday, tweeting that “we can’t let this fly under the radar.”

“The Trump administration is systemically appointing extreme judges to the federal bench,” Harris tweeted. “Today, over my objections the Judiciary Committee advanced the nomination of Wendy Vitter, someone who refused to endorse the Brown v. Board decision.