'We're close' on cyber bill, says Intel chairman

The final text of the Senate Intelligence Committee’s major cybersecurity bill could be released Monday night or Tuesday morning, Committee Chairman Richard BurrRichard Mauze BurrTrump, Congress brace for Mueller findings GOP's Tillis comes under pressure for taking on Trump Warner says there are 'enormous amounts of evidence' suggesting Russia collusion MORE (R-N.C.) told The Hill.

“We’re real close,” he said off the Senate floor.

The Cybersecurity Information Sharing Act (CISA) would give legal liability protections to private firms sharing cyber threat data with the government. It advanced out of committee on Thursday by a 14-1 vote.


The bill, intended to help companies stem the rising tide of cyberattacks, has been a top priority for industry groups and many lawmakers on both sides of the aisle.

Privacy advocates are anxious to see if Burr and ranking Democrat Dianne FeinsteinDianne Emiel FeinsteinThe Hill's Morning Report - Presented by Pass USMCA Coalition - Dems look for traction following Barr-Mueller findings Senate GOP eyes probes into 2016 issues 'swept under the rug' Top Senate Judiciary Dem asks Barr to hand over full Mueller report by April 1 MORE (Calif.) followed through on a promise to address many of the privacy concerns raised by a CISA discussion draft.

“I’ve made it very clear,” Sen. Patrick LeahyPatrick Joseph LeahyTop Senate Dem to Trump: It would be a 'grave mistake' to follow in Richard Nixon's footsteps Booker takes early lead in 2020 endorsements Hillicon Valley: Mueller delivers report, ending investigation | FEMA exposed info of 2.3M disaster survivors | Facebook asks judge to toss DC privacy lawsuit | Trump picks his first CTO | FCC settles lawsuit over net neutrality records MORE (D-Vt.) told The Hill on Monday. “If my concerns are not answered, then I’m going to have to vote against it.”

The Intel panel adopted at least parts of 12 privacy-focused amendments during the bill’s markup.

“We have bent over backwards to provide those things in the bill that we thought were meaningful and important” to privacy advocates, Feinstein told reporters after the vote.

In recent weeks, Feinstein worked closely with Leahy and Sen. Tom CarperThomas (Tom) Richard CarperBiden's challenge: Satisfying the left Dems introduce bill requiring disclosure of guest logs from White House, Trump properties Lobbying world MORE (D-Del.), who both expressed reservations to the committee about CISA’s privacy provisions.

At the heart of debate is how companies should share cyber data with the government. Privacy advocates are concerned about the intelligence community — and the National Security Agency (NSA) in particular — using the greater flow of data to collect more sensitive information on Americans.

Both Leahy and Carper took a wait-and-see approach on Monday. Neither have seen the final text, they said.

“They have incorporated some of those changes,” Carper told The Hill. “I’ll take a look to see what else we think needs to be done.”

Feinstein and Burr said they’ve addressed many of Leahy and Carper’s worries in CISA’s final language.

Notably, CISA will not allow electronic, real-timesharing with intelligence agencies. Instead, companies will be heavily incentivized to go through the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), a civilian agency seen as having better privacy oversight.

Carper, the top Democrat on the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee, is backing his own cyber info-sharing bill that would put the DHS at the center of nearly all public-private cyber data exchanges.

“We’re grateful for their interesting in taking up our ideas,” Carper told The Hill on Monday.

Carper mentioned that CISA was DHS-centric enough that if it had been introduced “as a standalone bill, it would be assigned” to his committee.

Leahy cautioned that CISA will have to win over privacy advocates in the Senate in order to pass. The Intelligence Committee is pushing to get a floor vote on the bill by mid-April.

“I think there’s a bipartisan coalition for more privacy,” said Leahy, the Judiciary Committee's ranking member. “Senator Feinstein has been very good at keeping in touch with us and we’ll see.”