House panel passes amendment to block new round of Pentagon base closures

The House Armed Services Committee passed an amendment in the Defense authorization bill that prohibits new rounds of the Base Realignment Closure Commission (BRAC) by a vote of 44 to 18, with 14 Democrats joining Republicans to support it, and 5 GOP members opposed.

The amendment, offered by Rep. Rob WittmanRobert (Rob) Joseph WittmanTrade groups make lobbying push to be included in small business loan program Overnight Defense: 32 dead in ISIS-claimed attack in Kabul | Trump says Taliban could 'possibly' overrun Afghan government when US leaves | House poised for Iran war powers vote next week Republicans eye top spot on Natural Resources panel MORE (R-Va.), says that “none of the funds” in the act “may be used to propose, plan for, or execute an additional BRAC round.”

ADVERTISEMENT

The committee’s ranking member Rep. Adam SmithDavid (Adam) Adam SmithOvernight Defense: Embattled Pentagon policy nominee withdraws, gets appointment to deputy policy job | Marines, sailor killed in California training accident identified | Governors call for extension of funding for Guard's coronavirus response The Hill's Coronavirus Report: iBIO Chairman and CEO Thomas Isett says developing a safe vaccine is paramount; US surpasses 150,000 coronavirus deaths with roughy one death per minute Overnight Defense: US to pull 11,900 troops from Germany | Troop shuffle to cost 'several billion' dollars | Lawmakers pan drawdown plan | Trump says he hasn't discussed alleged bounties with Putin MORE (D-Wash.) led the sparse opposition to the amendment, saying that BRAC is unpopular but a necessary move to cut excess budget costs.

He particularly took issue with the amendment for tying the hands of the Pentagon to plan for future base closures.

“We just want to protect our stuff, and I understand that’s what’s driving this,” Smith said at Wednesday’s markup. “To simply cut off the debate and say DOD can’t do this and can’t even think about it, I think is irresponsible.”

But Wittman questioned whether now was the time to undergo new BRAC rounds when the Pentagon is in the midst of cutting $487 billion from its budget over the next decade, because there are up-front costs associated with BRAC.

One committee member who opposes BRAC, Rep. John Kline (R-Minn.), still opposed Wittman’s amendment. Kline, a retired Marine, said he was concerned about including the words “plan for” in the prohibition on BRAC, arguing that the military is constantly planning and shouldn’t be stopped from discussing future base closures.

“Because of those two words I reluctantly can’t support the amendment,” Kline said.