Army, Air Force generals back base closures

Army, Air Force generals back base closures
© Getty Images

The vice chiefs of the Army and Air Force on Tuesday threw their support behind another round of base closures as a way to save substantial amounts of money that can be put to use for the military’s other needs.

"It's real money that we really need to reinvest into deferred maintenance and infrastructure backlog," Gen. Daniel Allyn, the Army's vice chief of staff, told the House Armed Services Committee on Tuesday.

Gen. Stephen Wilson, vice chief of staff for the Air Force, agreed: "In today's budget environment, it makes sense to invest wisely, so BRAC would help us make smart investments to prepare for the future.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Wilson and Allyn were testifying alongside their Marines and Navy counterparts on the state of the military. They painted a bleak picture, lamenting that budget cuts have slashed the readiness of the force to fight in a war against a high-end adversary such as Russia.

But the closure process, known as Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC), has been a politically unpopular solution to the issue. Lawmakers in both parties oppose BRAC because of the potential for negative economic impact on the communities around bases.

The last round of BRAC was in 2005, and under current law, another round is banned.

But supporters of BRAC were bolstered recently by Sen. John McCainJohn Sidney McCain The 13 Republicans needed to pass gun-control legislation Biden's debate performance renews questions of health At debate, Warren and Buttigieg tap idealism of Obama, FDR MORE (R-Ariz.), chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee, who said he and committee ranking member Jack ReedJohn (Jack) Francis ReedIs the Senate ready to protect American interests in space? Trump moving forward to divert .6B from military projects for border wall GOP lawmakers call for provisions barring DOD funds for border wall to be dropped MORE (D-R.I.) were looking into BRAC to address budget issues.

After McCain’s comment, Rep. Adam SmithDavid (Adam) Adam SmithIran talks unlikely despite window of opportunity GOP lawmakers call for provisions barring DOD funds for border wall to be dropped Warren's pledge to avoid first nuclear strike sparks intense pushback MORE (D-Wash.), a longtime BRAC supporter and ranking member of the House committee, reintroduced a bill to allow for BRAC.

At Tuesday’s hearing, Allyn said the Army has saved $1 billion annually from the 2005 round and has about $11 billion in backlog maintenance. Wilson estimated the Air Force’s backlog totals $25 billion.

Right now, the Air Force has 25 percent excess capacity, Wilson added. Meanwhile, the Army will have a 21 percent excess capacity if it increases to 490,000 soldiers, Allyn said.

While Allyn and Wilson supported BRAC, Gen. Glenn Walters, assistant commandant of the Marine Corps, said his service has the right amount of infrastructure for its needs.

“We think we’re about right,” he said. “But we’ll participate in BRAC to see if there’s any savings with our partners.”