Warren confronts acting Pentagon chief over $164B war fund request

Warren confronts acting Pentagon chief over $164B war fund request
© Stefani Reynolds

Acting Defense Secretary Patrick ShanahanPatrick Michael ShanahanWhite House: ISIS territory in Syria has been 100 percent eliminated Overnight Defense: Top Marine warns border deployment could hurt readiness | McSally aims for sexual assault reforms in defense bill | House to vote on measure opposing transgender ban | New warning over F-35 sale to Turkey On The Money: Trump rolls dice on uncertain economy | 737 crisis tests Boeing's clout in Washington | Watchdog group pushes 2020 candidates for 10 years of tax returns MORE denied Thursday that a Pentagon war fund has become a slush fund under sharp questioning from Sen. Elizabeth WarrenElizabeth Ann WarrenTrump on 2020 Dems skipping AIPAC: 'I think they're anti-Jewish' The Hill's Morning Report — Washington readies for Mueller end game 2020 Dems avoid this year's AIPAC conference MORE (D-Mass.).

Warren, who is running for the 2020 Democratic nomination for president, was pressing Shanahan on the Pentagon’s request for $164 billion for the Overseas Contingency Operation (OCO) account in fiscal year 2020.

Of that total, the Pentagon has said $66 billion are actually war funds and $98 billion are for what would otherwise be considered base budget items.

OCO is theoretically a war fund only to be used for temporary expenses, though over the years it has increasingly been used for base budget items since it is not subject to budget caps.

But the Trump administration’s budget plan relies on OCO even more than has become normal, using the account to skirt budget caps and avoid having to make a deal with Democrats to also raise nondefense spending.

“What we're really talking about here is the establishment of a slush fund to hide what's happening with defense spending and get it out from underneath the statutory caps,” Warren said at a Senate Armed Services Committee hearing.

“There is no slush fund,” Shanahan replied.

Shanahan’s argument was that regardless of what account the money is being putting into, the entire $750 billion defense budget would support the National Defense Strategy.

“We have provided in our justification books 100 percent transparency,” he said. “We can take the money and tie it back to the National Defense Strategy and what we need to defend America.”

Warren highlighted that the OCO request for fiscal 2020 is 140 percent higher than fiscal 2019’s $69 billion for OCO.

“So tell me, did the cost of supporting our overseas operations suddenly increase by 140 percent last year?” she asked Shanahan.

“Senator, they did not,” he replied.

Other Democratic senators also expressed opposition to the OCO proposal. In his opening statement, ranking member Sen. Jack ReedJohn (Jack) Francis ReedOvernight Defense: Top Marine warns border deployment could hurt readiness | McSally aims for sexual assault reforms in defense bill | House to vote on measure opposing transgender ban | New warning over F-35 sale to Turkey Marine Corps commander: Using troops at southern border an 'unacceptable risk' to readiness Overnight Defense: Pentagon chief under investigation over Boeing ties | Trump uses visual aids to tout progress against ISIS | Pentagon, Amnesty International spar over civilian drone deaths MORE (D-R.I.) called it a “particularly egregious misuse” of the account, adding it “far exceeds any precedent and cannot be justified.”

Shanahan was testifying at his first committee hearing since becoming acting secretary, and his testimony was being viewed as a make-or-break moment in his audition to be nominated for the job permanently.