House Armed Services panel gets classified briefing on Saudi attacks

House Armed Services panel gets classified briefing on Saudi attacks
© Getty Images

The House Armed Services Committee received a classified briefing Thursday afternoon about the attacks on Saudi Arabian oil facilities.

“The biggest thing that I’m hoping to find out is what are we planning, what are our options,” committee Chairman Adam SmithDavid (Adam) Adam SmithSenate GOP blocks defense bill, throwing it into limbo On steel and aluminum trade, Trumpism still rules Overnight Defense & National Security — Presented by Boeing — Pentagon vows more airstrike transparency MORE (D-Wash.) said ahead of the briefing. “I think we’ve all seen the intelligence. … The question is, where do we go from here?"

“And also I think to make sure everyone’s clear on the point that an attack on Saudi Arabia is not an attack on the United States of America, and the two should not be conflated,” he continued. “And an attack on Saudi Arabia gives no legal justification whatsoever to the president for U.S. military action.”


The closed-door briefing was conducted by Pentagon and State Department officials, including acting assistant secretary of Defense for international security affairs Katie Wheelbarger, a committee staffer told The Hill.

The attacks on two Saudi oil facilities last weekend in which Iran is suspected to be involved set off an intense debate in Washington over how to respond.

Secretary of State Mike PompeoMike PompeoNo time for the timid: The dual threats of progressives and Trump Psaki: Sexism contributes to some criticism of Harris Mnuchin, Pompeo mulled plan to remove Trump after Jan. 6: book MORE has directly blamed Iran for the attacks, calling them an “act of war.” But President TrumpDonald TrumpPence: Supreme Court has chance to right 'historic wrong' with abortion ruling Prosecutor says during trial that actor Jussie Smollett staged 'fake hate crime' Overnight Defense & National Security — US, Iran return to negotiating table MORE has not gone that far, saying only that it “looks” like Iran is to blame.

A Pentagon spokesman said Thursday the department was waiting for Saudi Arabia’s assessment before directly blaming Iran for the attack, but that “all indications are” that “Iran is in some way responsible.”

After first raising the prospect of military action by threatening that the U.S. is “locked and loaded,” Trump has said he does not want war and that he has “many options” on how to respond. He also said Wednesday he is ordering new sanctions on Iran.

Few in Congress have shown an appetite for a military strike, with many of Trump’s fellow Republicans pumping the breaks on immediate action by saying a full assessment of what happened needs to be done before deciding how to respond.

Some, including Sen. Lindsey GrahamLindsey Olin GrahamGraham emerges as go-to ally for Biden's judicial picks This Thanksgiving, skip the political food fights and talk UFOs instead Biden move to tap oil reserves draws GOP pushback MORE (R-S.C.), have advocated for a retaliatory military strike. Graham’s argument, which is that Tehran saw weakness in Trump’s decision not to strike Iran earlier this summer after it downed a U.S. drone, has led to a spat between him and his typical ally Trump.

Amid the debate over how to respond to the attacks, Congress is negotiating the final version of the annual defense policy bill, including whether to retain a House-passed amendment aimed at preventing Trump from launching a military strike against Iran. 

House and Senate negotiators held their first official meeting Thursday to reconcile the two versions of the National Defense Authorization Act. Smith said the Iran amendment came up during the conference meeting, but that no resolution was reached.