SPONSORED:

Five ways Trump's Syria decision spells trouble

President TrumpDonald John TrumpNearly 300 former national security officials sign Biden endorsement letter DC correspondent on the death of Michael Reinoehl: 'The folks I know in law enforcement are extremely angry about it' Late night hosts targeted Trump over Biden 97 percent of the time in September: study MORE this week showed no sign of backing down on his decision to withdraw U.S. troops from northern Syria, stoking fears in Washington of worst-case scenarios from abandoning a crucial defense partner. 

Trump's move, which has paved the way for Turkey to proceed with a long-planned offensive against Syrian Kurdish forces who were instrumental in the fight against ISIS, has far-reaching implications both at home and abroad.

Critics, including many from Trump's own party, argue the president is irreparably damaging the country's standing as a reliable partner by abandoning a U.S. ally, the Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF), to be slaughtered by Turkey as well as fueling mayhem in the region that could allow ISIS to regain its footing.

ADVERTISEMENT

Trump, however, has pushed ahead, insisting the Kurds have mostly been fighting for their land and that he is filling a campaign promise to end “forever wars.”

Here are five reasons Trump's move could spell trouble.

ISIS fight upended, threatening a resurgence 

In moving back from the Syria-Turkey border, U.S. troops left their Kurdish partners to both guard prisons holding more than 10,000 ISIS fighters and defend against Turkey's incursion.

Critics fear the SDF will abandon or release ISIS prisoners when it has to devote its resources to fighting Ankara.

The attacks also have distracted from NATO’s counter-ISIS campaign, though Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Gen. Mark Milley on Friday insisted that the fight against ISIS in Syria had not stopped.

The SDF “is still guarding prisoners in the area that have been detained over time,” he told reporters at the Pentagon while acknowledging the Turkish incursion “has had some effect” on the ISIS fight.

ADVERTISEMENT

The administration insists Turkey will be responsible for detaining ISIS fighters, but Brett McGurk, who resigned as Trump’s special envoy to the anti-ISIS coalition in December, warned Turkey “has neither the intent, desire, nor capacity” to manage ISIS detainees.

“Believing otherwise is a reckless gamble with our national security,” he tweeted.

US reputation damaged for future partnerships

In defending his decision to pull back U.S. troops, Trump has claimed he is fulfilling a campaign promise to halt “endless wars.”

But in leaving the SDF to fend for itself, lawmakers warn Trump has sent a chilling message to allies and potential U.S. partners who may want help in future conflicts.

The Trump administration "cut deal with [Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan] allowing him to wipe [the Kurds] out. Damage to our reputation & national interest will be extraordinary & long lasting," Sen. Marco RubioMarco Antonio RubioOwners of meatpacker JBS to pay 0M fine over foreign bribery charges Questions raised about conflicts of interest around Biden son-in-law America needs an industrial policy — now more than ever MORE (R-Fla.) wrote on Twitter on Wednesday.

The president also sparked backlash among lawmakers for downplaying the Kurds’ role in helping the U.S. fight against ISIS, tweeting that they "fought with us, but were paid massive amounts of money and equipment to do so."

Trump maintained during a rambling press conference Wednesday that the Kurds are merely "fighting for their land." He attempted to justify his stance based on the fact that Kurdish soldiers did not fight alongside Americans during World War II.

The Kurds "didn't help us in the Second World War, they didn't help us with Normandy as an example—they mention the names of different battles, they weren't there," Trump said.

Syrian Kurdish officials have accused the president of stabbing them in the back after 11,000 of their troops were killed in the battle against ISIS.

"Now we have been betrayed," Ilham Ahmed, co-chairman of the Syrian Democratic Council, the SDF's political arm, wrote in a Washington Post op-ed this week.

Defense Secretary Mark EsperMark EsperOvernight Defense: Supreme Court to hear case on diversion of Pentagon funds to border wall | Biden campaign cutting retired general from ad after objection | Trump's arms control talks with Russia hit wall Biden campaign removing retired general from ad after his complaint Overnight Defense: Pentagon IG to audit use of COVID-19 funds on contractors | Dems optimistic on blocking Trump's Germany withdrawal | Obama slams Trump on foreign policy MORE insisted Friday that "we have not abandoned the Kurds" but said the U.S. was focused on protecting its own soldiers first.

Trump goes head-to-head with his own party 

Some of the staunchest critics of Trump’s Syria move include numerous figures from his own party.

ADVERTISEMENT

The pushback came swiftly, with former U.N. Ambassador Nikki HaleyNimrata (Nikki) HaleyGraham says SC people of color can go anywhere in the state but 'need to be conservative, not liberal' 'The soul' versus 'law and order' Author Ryan Girdusky: RNC worked best when highlighting 'regular people' as opposed to 'standard Republicans' MORE tweeting that leaving the Kurds “to die is a big mistake.”

Sen. Lindsey GrahamLindsey Olin GrahamGOP blocks Schumer effort to adjourn Senate until after election Biden and Schumer face battles with left if Democrats win big Push to expand Supreme Court faces Democratic buzzsaw MORE (R-S.C.), a close Trump ally, called the decision a “disaster in the making,” adding that it “ensures [an] ISIS comeback” and “will be a stain on America’s honor.”

Graham, along with Sen. Chris Van HollenChristopher (Chris) Van Hollen Senate Democrats call for ramped up Capitol coronavirus testing Democratic senators offer bill to make payroll tax deferral optional for federal workers Senators push for Turkey sanctions after reports Ankara used Russian system to detect US-made jets MORE (D-Md.), is looking to impose financial repercussions on Turkey.

House Republican Conference Chairwoman Liz CheneyElizabeth (Liz) Lynn CheneySteve King defends past comments on white supremacy, blasts NYT and GOP leaders in fiery floor speech GOP lawmakers distance themselves from Trump comments on transfer of power Graham vows GOP will accept election results after Trump comments MORE (Wyo.) this coming week also plans to introduce legislation to implement sanctions on Turkey, an act that has already garnered more than two dozen GOP co-sponsors.

House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthyKevin Owen McCarthyConservatives seize on New York Post story to push Section 230 reform Sunday shows preview: Coronavirus cases surge in the Midwest; Trump hits campaign trail after COVID-19 OVERNIGHT ENERGY: EPA may violate courts with new rule extending life of unlined coal ash ponds | Trump reverses course, approving assistance for California wildfires | Climate change, national security among topics for final Trump-Biden debate MORE (R-Calif.), House Minority Whip Rep. Steve ScaliseStephen (Steve) Joseph ScaliseJordan vows to back McCarthy as leader even if House loses more GOP seats Cedric Richmond's next move: 'Sky's the limit' if Biden wins Candymakers meet virtually with lawmakers for annual fly-in, discuss Halloween safety MORE (R-La.) and House Armed Services Committee ranking member Mac ThornberryWilliam (Mac) McClellan ThornberryChamber of Commerce endorses former White House physician Ronny Jackson for Congress Overnight Defense: Senate passes stopgap spending bill hours before shutdown deadline | Brief military mentions in chaotic first Trump, Biden debate | Lawmakers grills Pentagon officials over Germany drawdown Lawmakers grill Pentagon over Trump's Germany drawdown MORE (R-Texas) are among the Republicans who have supported the legislation so far.

The Democratic chairman and ranking Republican on the House Foreign Affairs Committee said Friday they will also introduce legislation to slap sanctions on Turkey.

Washington's relationship with Ankara is further strained

ADVERTISEMENT

The relationship between the U.S. and Turkey has been tense over the last several years and was made all the worse in July after Ankara purchased a Russian air defense system.

The system is incompatible with other NATO systems and led the United States to remove Turkey from the F-35 joint strike fighter program, with U.S. national security personnel fearing the Russian system would allow the Kremlin to glean sensitive and protected information from the advanced fighter jet.

Esper on Friday said the United States is “greatly disappointed” by Turkey’s offensive in Syria and that it had damaged the already tense relationship between the two countries.

Making matters worse, U.S. Special Forces troops stationed in Syria came under artillery fire from Turkey late Friday, even as Milley earlier in the day said the Turkish military “is fully aware, down to explicit grid coordinate detail, of the locations of U.S. forces.”

The Pentagon maintained it “remains opposed” to the operation, especially “in areas where the Turks know U.S. forces are present,” and warned Turkey it may respond if U.S. troops are threatened.

“The U.S. demands that Turkey avoid actions that could result in immediate defensive action,” Navy Capt. Brook DeWalt said in a statement.

Rising tensions were underscored when the leaders of the House Foreign Relations panel signaled their support for legislation to slap sanctions on Turkey. The bipartisan bill would sanction Turkish officials and banks until the country ends its military operations in Syria.

ADVERTISEMENT

Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin on Friday also threatened “powerful sanctions” against Ankara and said the United States “can shut down the Turkish economy if we need to.”

Erdoğan said the same day, however, that Turkey “will not take a step back” from its offensive. 

Russia, Iran empowered by move

Trump’s decision in northern Syria has left a potential power vacuum in the area, with security experts and former U.S. officials calling the move “a gift” to U.S. adversaries such as Russia and Iran.

“Trump tonight after one call with a foreign leader provided a gift to Russia, Iran, and ISIS,” McGurk said Monday on Twitter.

Moscow and Tehran have both inserted their militaries into Syria’s eight-year civil war, bolstering Syrian President Bashar Assad, while the United States has imposed sanctions on Russia for its support of the Assad government.

National security experts fear that Russian President Vladimir PutinVladimir Vladimirovich PutinSafeguarding US elections by sanctioning Russian sovereign debt DOJ: Russian hackers targeted 2018 Olympics, French elections Putin stands with Belarus's dictator — we should stand by its people MORE, who has made no secret of extending the Kremlin’s influence into the Middle East, will use Trump’s move as an opportunity to gain more of a foothold in Syria.

Putin late this week called on foreign militaries to leave Syria as Turkey continued to wage its offensive while signaling that Russian forces would stay in the country until a new Syrian government tells Moscow it doesn't need any more help.

Russia already counts Turkey as a friend, with Moscow selling a missile defense system to Ankara earlier this year, drawing the ire of Washington.

Former CIA Deputy Director John McLaughlin slammed Trump for "impulsive and reckless instincts," calling his move this week “a disaster on multiple levels.”

“The kingmakers will be U.S. rivals Russia and Iran, working with a wandering U.S. ally, Turkey,” McLaughlin wrote Thursday.