SPONSORED:

Washington braces as North Korea deadline looms

Lawmakers are bracing for a North Korean provocation as its year-end deadline for the United States to change its policies draws near.

Rhetoric is already heating back up, with North Korea reviving its “dotard” insult of President TrumpDonald TrumpChinese apps could face subpoenas, bans under Biden executive order: report Kim says North Korea needs to be 'prepared' for 'confrontation' with US Ex-Colorado GOP chair accused of stealing more than 0K from pro-Trump PAC MORE and saying “foolish” U.S. actions have already helped it make a “definite decision” on its next steps.

Senators were loath to predict what exactly the unpredictable country might do after its deadline passes. But as analysts forecast a return to intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) and nuclear tests, lawmakers warned of rocky times ahead.

ADVERTISEMENT

“If North Korea goes back to nuclear testing or they go back to ICBM testing, that will destroy their last best chance to have a win-win agreement with President Trump and that will put us on a collision course because we’re not going to allow them to develop the military capability to strike America with a nuclear weapon,” Sen. Lindsey GrahamLindsey Olin GrahamOVERNIGHT ENERGY:  EPA announces new clean air advisors after firing Trump appointees |  Senate confirms Biden pick for No. 2 role at Interior | Watchdog: Bureau of Land Management saw messaging failures, understaffing during pandemic Graham, Whitehouse: Global transition to renewables would help national security Hillicon Valley: Senate unanimously confirms Chris Inglis as first White House cyber czar | Scrutiny mounts on Microsoft's surveillance technology | Senators unveil bill to crack down on cyber criminals MORE (R-S.C.) said. “So if they go down that road, it will burn the bridges available to them.”

U.S. talks with North Korea on denuclearization have floundered since Trump walked away from his February summit with North Korean leader Kim Jong UnKim Jong UnKim says North Korea needs to be 'prepared' for 'confrontation' with US North Korea's Kim warns of possible food shortage Overnight Defense: Austin and Milley talk budget, Afghanistan, sexual assault and more at wide-ranging Senate hearing MORE after they hit an impasse on how much sanctions relief the United States should offer and how much of its weapons program Pyongyang was willing to shut down.

Hopes for revived negotiations were piqued when Trump met with Kim at the Korean peninsula’s demilitarized zone in June and agreed to resume working-level talks. But those working-level talks didn’t happen until October, and they quickly broke down again.

Meanwhile, North Korea resumed testing short-range missiles, conducting more than a dozen launches this year.

Pyongyang also started warning that if the United States does not soften its negotiating stance by the end of the year, it would start taking a “new path.” North Korean officials have not specified what that path is, but regional experts expect it includes tests of ICMBs and nuclear warheads, breaking a self-imposed moratorium on such tests.

Earlier this month, North Korea warned the United States about the possibility of an unwelcome “Christmas gift.” Pyongyang also announced a rare planning meeting of top officials from the ruling party happening in late December, where experts have said Kim could make a major announcement like the end of talks with the United States.

ADVERTISEMENT

Asked about potential North Korean provocations in the new year, Sen. Mitt RomneyWillard (Mitt) Mitt RomneyThe Hill's Morning Report - After high-stakes Biden-Putin summit, what now? China's genocide must be stopped How Biden can get the infrastructure bill through Congress MORE (R-Utah) said he “can’t predict” what they will do, but that he’s “always concerned about North Korea.”

“I don’t think they can be trusted at all,” Romney said. “I think history has proven that what they say and what they do are in different universes, and I hope that we maintain very strict sanctions on North Korea and recognize them for what they are.”

At a United Nations Security Council meeting on North Korea this past week, U.S. Ambassador Kelly Craft warned the rogue state against launching a satellite using ICBM technology or ICBMs themselves that are “designed to attack the continental United States with nuclear weapons.”

“Missile and nuclear testing will not bring the DPRK greater security,” Craft said, using the acronym for North Korea’s official name. “It will not bring the DPRK or the region greater stability. It will not help the DPRK achieve the economic opportunities it seeks. In fact, it will do the opposite, complicating our ability to negotiate an agreement that would positively address the DPRK’s security and economic goals, and improve regional stability.”

North Korea responded by calling the U.S. decision to convene the Security Council meeting a “hostile provocation.”

“By holding the meeting, the U.S. did a foolish thing which will boomerang on it, and decisively helped us make a definite decision on what way to choose,” a Foreign Ministry spokesman said in a statement carried by the official Korean Central News Agency.

Trump himself has been more dismissive of North Korea’s deadline, suggesting Kim doesn’t want to hurt his re-election chances.

“I’d be surprised if North Korea acted hostilely,” Trump said this month. “I have a very good relationship with Kim Jong Un. I think we both want to keep it that way. He knows I have an election coming up. I don’t think he wants to interfere with that. But we’ll have to see.”

Still, Trump added that “there’s no question” there is “certain hostility.” Trump has also revived his Rocket Man nickname for Kim that he used during the height of tensions in 2017.

“He definitely likes sending rockets up, doesn't he? That's why I call him Rocket Man,” Trump said while in London for a NATO summit.

North Korea responded to Trump’s renewed nicknamed by bringing back its own 2017 insult: dotard.

“If any language and expressions stoking the atmosphere of confrontation are used once again on purpose at a crucial moment as now, that must really be diagnosed as the relapse of the dotage of a dotard,” Choe Son Hui, first vice-minister of Foreign Affairs, said in a statement carried by KCNA.

ADVERTISEMENT

With the war of words already heating back up weeks before the end of the year, Trump’s critics are blaming him for what they describe as shoddy diplomacy.

“The president won’t engage in real diplomacy,” Sen. Chris MurphyChristopher (Chris) Scott MurphyBipartisan infrastructure deal takes fire from left and right Democrats mull overhaul of sweeping election bill Rising crime rejuvenates gun control debate on campaign trail MORE (D-Conn.) said. “He thinks he can get a deal between himself and Kim, which he can’t. He needs help. He sold out the South Koreans multiple times. He can only talk to China about trade. He doesn’t have the ability to walk and chew gum with China at the same time.”

Murphy added that while “nobody should be in the business of trying to predict what North Korea is going to do,” he is worried Pyongyang sees weakness and will “calculate that they can get away with some significant new testing.”

Senate Foreign Relations Committee ranking member Bob MenendezRobert (Bob) MenendezSchumer says Senate will vote on repealing 2002 war authorization The Hill's Morning Report - Biden-Putin meeting to dominate the week Sanders drops bid to block Biden's Israel arms sale MORE (D-N.J.) similarly expressed concern about actions an “emboldened” Kim could take.

“The president has engaged in high-profile and risky diplomacy, given Kim Jong Un – who was an international pariah – now recognition, stopped our exercises with our allies and weakened the sanctions regime as a result of his actions, and gotten nothing in return,” Menendez said.

“If anything, I think Kim Jong Un feels more emboldened," he added. "So I am worried about how emboldened he’ll be.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Some Republicans, though, are brushing off North Korea’s warnings as typical of the notoriously bellicose country.

“We’re always concerned about North Korea, but I don’t believe this is an atypical performance on their part,” Sen. Deb FischerDebra (Deb) Strobel FischerLobbying world On The Money: May jobs report to land at pivotal moment in Biden agenda | Biden, top GOP negotiator agree to continue infrastructure talks Friday JBS ransomware attack underscores threat facing meat industry MORE (R-Neb.) said.

On Friday, Defense Secretary Mark EsperMark EsperOvernight Defense: Top admiral shoots back at criticism of 'woke' military | Military guns go missing | New White House strategy to battle domestic extremism Top admiral shoots back at criticism of 'woke' military: 'We are not weak' Cotton, Pentagon chief tangle over diversity training in military MORE predicted the United States would soon be “tested” on whether it can bring North Korea back to the negotiating table.

“The only way forward is through a diplomatic, political agreement,” Esper said in an address at the Council on Foreign Relations in New York.

“War on the peninsula would be horrible. Nobody wants to see that.”