SPONSORED:

House panel votes against curtailing Insurrection Act powers after heated debate

House panel votes against curtailing Insurrection Act powers after heated debate
© Getty Images

The House Armed Services Committee has voted against limiting presidential authority under the Insurrection Act, the law President TrumpDonald TrumpTrump announces new tranche of endorsements DeSantis, Pence tied in 2024 Republican poll Lawmakers demand changes after National Guard troops at Capitol sickened from tainted food MORE threatened to invoke to deploy active-duty troops in response to protests against racial injustices.

The amendment, offered by Rep. Veronica EscobarVeronica EscobarBill introduced to create RBG monument on Capitol Hill El Paso shooting survivor deported to Mexico after traffic stop House Judiciary Democrats ask Pence to invoke 25th Amendment to remove Trump MORE (D-Texas), failed largely along party lines in a 25-31 vote. Several moderate or vulnerable Democrats voted against the amendment: Reps. Kendra HornKendra Suzanne HornThe US's investment in AI is lagging, we have a chance to double it What should Biden do with NASA and the Artemis Program? Here are the 17 GOP women newly elected to the House this year MORE (Okla.), Xochitl Torres Small (N.M.), Jared Golden (Maine), Elaine LuriaElaine Goodman LuriaDemocrats snipe on policy, GOP brawls over Trump Chamber-endorsed Dems struggle on election night Overnight Defense: How members of the Armed Services committees fared in Tuesday's elections | Military ballots among those uncounted in too-close-to-call presidential race | Ninth US service member killed by COVID-19 MORE (Va.), Anthony Brindisi (N.Y.) and Gil CisnerosGilbert (Gil) Ray CisnerosMORE (Calif.).

Last month, Trump threatened to invoke the Insurrection Act at the height of the protests, saying he would deploy active-duty troops if governors did not “dominate” demonstrators.

ADVERTISEMENT

The 1807 act creates an exception to the general prohibition on using the U.S. military to enforce domestic laws. It was last used by former President George H.W. Bush at the request of California’s governor to quell the 1992 Rodney King riots.

Trump has not invoked the Insurrection Act despite his threat, but Democrats are still pushing changes to the law after federal law enforcement used force to clear protesters from Lafayette Square outside the White House. Trump also deployed thousands of National Guardsmen to Washington, D.C., and the administration ordered active-duty soldiers to deploy to outside D.C. and be ready to enter the city if ordered.

Escobar’s amendment would have required a president to make a certification to Congress that a state is unwilling or unable to suppress an unlawful obstruction or rebellion before invoking the Insurrection Act.

It would also have given Congress the power to pass a resolution to terminate a president’s use of the act.

The debate over the amendment was the most heated of the House Armed Services Committee’s National Defense Authorization Act markup Wednesday.

ADVERTISEMENT

Tempers flared as Reps. Anthony BrownAnthony Gregory BrownCongressional Black Caucus unveils '100 Day Plan' Lawmakers move to oust extremists from military Calls grow for 9/11-style panel to probe Capitol attack MORE (D-Md.) and Bradley ByrneBradley Roberts ByrneTrump's Slovenia Ambassador Lynda Blanchard jumps into Alabama Senate race Mo Brooks expresses interest in running for Shelby's Senate seat Ex-Rep. Mike Conaway, former aide launch lobbying firm MORE (R-Ala.) attempted to talk over each other, and Committee Chairman Adam SmithDavid (Adam) Adam SmithOvernight Defense: Capitol Police may ask National Guard to stay | Biden's Pentagon policy nominee faces criticism | Naval Academy midshipmen moved to hotels High alert as new QAnon date approaches Thursday Overnight Defense: Tim Kaine moves to claw back war powers authority | Study on sexual harassment and assault in the military MORE (D-Wash.) attempted to intervene.

Byrne first attempted to talk over Brown, but stopped after Smith took control of the proceeding and told Byne “you know the rules … don’t act aggrieved.”

When it was Byrne’s turn, Brown attempted to talk over him, and when Smith tried to stop that, Brown did not yield.

When Byrne implored Smith to intervene, Smith told him to “chill.”

After repeatedly saying Brown’s name, Smith shouted, “Mr. Brown” and struck his gavel three times.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Anthony,” an exasperated Smith said as Brown kept talking. “Are you kidding me, Anthony? Anthony, please suspend.”

Brown then asked Smith to treat him the same as Byrne, saying he “didn’t hear a first name admonition” against Byrne. Smith replied that was because Byrne stopped talking.

Smith then turned back to Byrne, who yielded time to Brown. Brown used that time to apologize.

“What I’m going to do is use my 30 seconds to make a very sincere, genuine apology to you, to the chairman and to this committee,” Brown said.

Smith said later in the markup he and Brown spoke to each other and that “we’re all good.”