Pentagon takes heat for extending Guard's time at Capitol

Pentagon takes heat for extending Guard's time at Capitol
© Greg Nash

The Pentagon is facing heat after it extended the deployment of National Guardsmen at the U.S. Capitol for another two months.

Lawmakers have amplified their calls to prove the validity of the Guard’s mission — which earlier this week was extended through most of May — as the Defense Department has struggled to relay the reasoning for the deployment’s months-long continuation.

Likely to add to the scrutiny is the Pentagon’s new estimate that the National Guard’s deployment at the U.S. Capitol is expected to cost $521 million through May.


The Guard’s additional two months will cost $111 million while the initial three months of the mission, from January to March, will cost an estimated $410 million, the National Guard Bureau said in a statement to The Hill on Friday.

Lawmakers from both parties in the House and Senate now want answers as to why the continued security is needed.

Top Senate Republicans on Friday demanded U.S. Capitol Police give justification for “intrusive” fencing and “burdensome” deployment of Guard troops at the Capitol, which they described as “disproportionate to the available intelligence.”

“Our National Guard troops, who serve with great honor and distinction, are not law enforcement officers, and we will not abide the continued militarization of Capitol complex security,” the senators wrote in a letter to U.S. Capitol Police Chief Yogananda Pittman.

Leaders of the House Armed Services Committee from both parties on Thursday said they were “deeply troubled” by the continued heavy military presence in the Beltway, calling instead for a drawdown.

“We cannot ignore the financial costs associated with this prolonged deployment, nor can we turn a blind eye to the effects it will soon have on the National Guard’s overall readiness,” Chairman Adam SmithDavid (Adam) Adam SmithGOP Rep. Turner to lead House push to address military sexual assault US is leaving, but Afghan women to fight on for freedoms Overnight Defense: Ex-Pentagon chief defends Capitol attack response as GOP downplays violence | Austin, Biden confer with Israeli counterparts amid conflict with Hamas | Lawmakers press Pentagon officials on visas for Afghan partners MORE (D-Wash.) and ranking member Rep. Mike RogersMichael (Mike) Dennis RogersFive questions about Biden withdrawal from Afghanistan Congress brings back corrupt, costly, and inequitably earmarks Biden defense budget criticized by Republicans, progressives alike MORE (R-Ala.) said in a joint statement Thursday.


Senate GOP Leader Mitch McConnellAddison (Mitch) Mitchell McConnellWashington showing signs of normalcy after year of restrictions Former OMB pick Neera Tanden to serve as senior adviser to Biden Lawmakers reach agreement on bipartisan Jan. 6 commission MORE (Ky.), also weighed in Wednesday, calling the increased security “overdone” and an overreaction.

“I’m extremely uncomfortable with the fact that my constituents can't come to the Capitol. With all this razor wire around the complex it reminds me of my last visit to Kabul,” McConnell told reporters.

The Pentagon earlier this week approved a request from Capitol Police to extend the presence of nearly 2,300 guardsmen at the Capitol through May 23. That number is still roughly half of the 5,100 now stationed at the Capitol, with their deployment initially expected to end this Friday.

The deployment is down from a high of 26,000 following the Jan. 6 attack on the nation’s capital by supporters of former President TrumpDonald TrumpSunday shows preview: House GOP removes Cheney from leadership position; CDC issues new guidance for fully vaccinated Americans Navajo Nation president on Arizona's new voting restrictions: An 'assault' on our rights The Memo: Lawmakers on edge after Greene's spat with Ocasio-Cortez MORE looking to prevent Congress from certifying President BidenJoe BidenWarren calls for US to support ceasefire between Israel and Hamas UN secretary general 'deeply disturbed' by Israeli strike on high rise that housed media outlets Nation's largest nurses union condemns new CDC guidance on masks MORE’s victory in the November election.

The guardsmen were originally only meant to bulk up security for Biden’s inauguration, but the deployment was extended afterward over continued security concerns.

“I don't think anybody wants to see this become an enduring mission,” Pentagon press secretary John Kirby told reporters on Thursday, adding that “there is a legitimate need” for the Guard due to “some capability gaps and capacity shortages right now that the Capitol Police are experiencing.”

Kirby would not say, however, what threats were relayed from the Capitol Police when they asked for the extended mission.

Likewise, answers aren’t coming from the Capitol Police, who have yet to detail what dangers warranted the added two months.

Capitol Police last month suggested that extremists may be planning another attack on the building when President Biden delivers a joint address later this spring, something for which he has not yet set a date.

“I haven’t been satisfied with any explanation Congress has received at numerous briefings that all these personnel, resources and barbed wire are needed,” Senate Armed Services Committee ranking member Jim InhofeJames (Jim) Mountain InhofeInhofe tells EPA nominee he'll talk to her 'daddy' if she does not 'behave' OVERNIGHT ENERGY: Senate nixes Trump rule limiting methane regulation | Senate confirms EPA chief: Biden's climate goals are 'an opportunity to lead' | Fine-particle pollution disproportionately hurts people of color: research EPA chief: Biden's climate goals are 'an opportunity to lead' MORE (R-Okla.), complained in a statement last week.

Lawmakers and Washington, D.C., residents alike have chafed at the guardsmen prominently walking the halls of Congress and standing guard around security fencing across Capitol Hill.

The Capitol has also had to close off or restrict numerous hearing rooms, parking lots and other areas to allow Guard operations.


In addition to the high cost and ominous presence, the deployment has also faced a host of other problems, including the death of a National Guard member after a medical emergency, defense officials said Thursday.

Earlier this month, lawmakers in both parties expressed concern after roughly 50 guardsmen were sickened from undercooked food.

And in January, lawmakers were outraged after some guardsmen were forced to rest in a parking garage instead of inside the Capitol complex. After photos of them camped in the garage circulated online the troops were quickly moved back inside.

“As the U.S. Capitol Police continues to build its personnel capacity, there is no doubt that some level of support from the National Guard should remain in the National Capital Region to respond to credible threats against the Capitol,” Smith and Rogers wrote Thursday. “However, the present security posture is not warranted at this time. ... It’s time for us to review what level of security is required, so [troops] can return home to their families and communities.”  

Concerns over the ever-stretching deployment have also come from current and former defense officials.

In a memo to senior Pentagon officials last month, National Guard Bureau chief Gen. Daniel Hokanson said Guard officials were having difficulty finding enough volunteers to continue the mission.


And leaders from the National Guard Association of the United States on Friday released a statement saying it was “increasingly difficult to convince Guard soldiers and airmen that their continued presence at the Capitol is warranted,” after a year of unprecedented demand on the Guard thanks to the COVID-19 pandemic and several natural disasters.

“National Guard soldiers and airmen here in Washington need to return home to their families, civilian employers and regular military obligations,” NGAUS Chairman Maj. Gen. Michael McGuire and retired Brig. Gen. J. Roy Robinson, NGAUS president, said in the release.