Overnight Defense: Pentagon says Trump canceled parade before cost briefing | Erik Prince renews push for contractors to run Afghan war | More officials join outcry over security clearances

Overnight Defense: Pentagon says Trump canceled parade before cost briefing | Erik Prince renews push for contractors to run Afghan war | More officials join outcry over security clearances
© Getty Images

THE TOPLINE: President TrumpDonald John TrumpMcCabe says he was fired because he 'opened a case against' Trump McCabe: Trump said 'I don't care, I believe Putin' when confronted with US intel on North Korea McCabe: Trump talked to me about his election victory during 'bizarre' job interview MORE canceled his desired military parade before Pentagon officials briefed him on cost estimates for the event, a Defense Department spokesman said Monday.

"The president was not briefed by any member of the Department of Defense on any cost associated with the parade," Col. Rob Manning told reporters at the Pentagon.

Contradictions?: The statement seems to go against Trump's own tweet from Friday morning, in which he claimed he axed the event after receiving a high cost estimate. The parade's purported $92 million price tag leaked to the media on Thursday.

"The local politicians who run Washington, D.C. (poorly) know a windfall when they see it. When asked to give us a price for holding a great celebratory military parade, they wanted a number so ridiculously high that I cancelled it," he wrote on Twitter.


Defense Secretary James MattisJames Norman MattisTrump nominates ambassador to Turkey Overnight Defense: Trump declares border emergency | .6B in military construction funds to be used for wall | Trump believes Obama would have started war with North Korea | Pentagon delivers aid for Venezuelan migrants Top US general: Trump wrong on Syria pullout, ISIS defeat MORE disputed the cost estimate, telling reporters traveling with him Thursday in South America that whoever gave out that number is "an idiot."

Manning said at that time that he had not been briefed on figures.

What is the actual price tag? Manning could not confirm the $92 million amount, as "the planning had not reached that level."

"Any figure that was cited was predecisional. The planning committee for the parade had not reached a point where they have briefed senior leadership in the department. It was moving forward, it had just not matured to that point," Manning said.

And DC council pushes back: The Washington, D.C. city council on Monday slammed White House budget director Mick MulvaneyJohn (Mick) Michael MulvaneyMulvaney told Trump officials their 'highest priority' will be deregulation: Axios High stakes as Trump, Dems open drug price talks Trump declares national emergency at border MORE for suggesting that the heavily Democratic city inflated the costs of Trump's military parade to prevent it from happening.

"Opposition to a $92 million tax-funded parade is nonpartisan," The DC Council's official Twitter account wrote. "We'd have opposed a $92 million parade led by the Obamas & Chuck Brown, with statehood floats made of hemp"

The statement came just a day after Mulvaney said on "Fox News Sunday" that he thinks D.C.'s city council "is not trying to help the president accomplish what he wants to accomplish."


ERIK PRINCE RENEWS PUSH FOR CONTRACTORS TO PRIVATIZE AFGHAN WAR: Blackwater founder Erik Prince is hopeful new leadership in Trump's national security team will give his plan to replace most U.S. troops in Afghanistan with private contractors a shot at becoming reality.

In an interview with The Hill, Prince pointed to national security adviser John Bolton's comments Sunday about being "open to new ideas" as a sign Bolton's thinking may differ from his predecessor, now-retired Lt. Gen. H.R. McMaster.

"Look, Gen. McMaster was a three-star serving Army officer who really wanted to be a four-star Army officer, and so the idea of him embracing anything unconventional is absolutely impossible," Prince said Monday during the phone interview.

"That being said, with John Bolton there now, I don't know that he's vested in a very conventional Pentagon approach. Maybe he's willing -- supposedly yesterday on the midday news shows he said he was open to exploring options for a solution in Afghanistan."

But Prince hasn't spoken to Trump: Prince said he has not spoken to Trump about his plan recently but that he knows "it's on his mind."

"Before we go headlong into another year of the same failed strategy, I think it's important that the president know that there are different options," Prince added.

The Hill has reached out to the National Security Council for comment.

What happened the last time Prince pushed this: A year ago Tuesday, Trump announced his strategy for the war in Afghanistan, now in its 17th year. He took away a timeline for withdrawal, added thousands more troops and loosened some rules of engagement.

At the time, Prince, now the head of Frontier Resource Group, tried to sell Trump on a plan to replace conventional U.S. forces with private contractors. His plan included sending 5,500 private military contractors to embed with Afghan forces at the battalion level - supported by a 90-plane private air force.

The plan was championed by former White House chief strategist Stephen Bannon, but was opposed by McMaster, Defense Secretary James Mattis, key leaders in Congress and Afghan President Ashraf Ghani.


OUTCRY OVER SECURITY CLEARANCES: Dozens of former national security officials have joined the chorus condemning Trump's decision to revoke former CIA Director John BrennanJohn Owen BrennanOvernight Defense: Trump declares border emergency | .6B in military construction funds to be used for wall | Trump believes Obama would have started war with North Korea | Pentagon delivers aid for Venezuelan migrants Trump: I believe Obama would have gone to war with North Korea Intel agencies' threat assessment matters more than tiff with Trump MORE's security clearance.

More than 150 former officials signed a brief statement Monday concurring with other recent statements opposing the "actual or threatened removal of security clearances from former government officials."

"All of us believe it is critical to protect classified information from unauthorized disclosure," the statement reads. "But we believe equally strongly that former government officials have the right to express their unclassified views on what they see as critical national security issues without fear of being punished for doing so."

The Monday statement follows a criticism from a dozen former officials, including past CIA directors, who called Trump's move "inappropriate and deeply regrettable" in their own statement.

What Trump did: Trump announced last week that he was revoking Brennan's clearance, saying through press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders that the former CIA chief's "lying" and "increasingly frenzied commentary" meant his security clearance was a threat to national security.

The president is reviewing security clearances for a number of other former officials who have been critical of his administration, including former FBI Director James ComeyJames Brien ComeyMcCabe says he was fired because he 'opened a case against' Trump McCabe: Trump said 'I don't care, I believe Putin' when confronted with US intel on North Korea McCabe: Trump talked to me about his election victory during 'bizarre' job interview MORE and former Deputy Attorney General Sally YatesSally Caroline YatesFrom border to Mueller, Barr faces challenges as attorney general Hillicon Valley: House Intel panel will release Russia interviews | T-Mobile, Sprint step up merger push | DHS cyber office hosting webinars on China | Nest warns customers to shore up password security House Intel panel votes to release Russia interview transcripts to Mueller MORE. Former officials typically keep their clearances in order to provide counsel to their successors.

Dem lawmakers also push back: Sen. Mark WarnerMark Robert WarnerSchiff: Evidence of collusion between Trump campaign, Russia 'pretty compelling' The Hill's 12:30 Report — Presented by Kidney Care Partners — Lawmakers scramble as shutdown deadline nears Steel lobby's PR blitz can't paper over damaging effects of tariffs MORE (Va.), the top Democrat on the Senate Intelligence Committee, is trying to rein in Trump's ability to revoke the security clearances of the administration's political critics.

Warner said on Monday that he filed the proposal as an amendment to the mammoth Defense, Health and Human Services, Labor and Education funding bill that's being debated by the Senate.

"President Trump's actions over the last week are beyond outrageous," Warner said in a statement. "His tactics are reminiscent of another president who abused his office to settle scores and punish critics."

Senate Minority Leader Charles SchumerCharles (Chuck) Ellis SchumerGOP Green New Deal stunt is a great deal for Democrats National emergency declaration — a legal fight Trump is likely to win House Judiciary Dems seek answers over Trump's national emergency declaration MORE (D-N.Y.) also lashed out at Trump's decision, arguing the move was driven by "spite and malice" and meant to silence a critic.  


US SERVICEMAN KILLED IN IRAQ: A U.S. serviceman was killed in a helicopter crash Sunday night in Iraq, the Pentagon confirmed Monday.

The helicopter crashed around 10 p.m. following a raid against an Islamic State in Iraq and Syria (ISIS) target, though there are no indications that it was brought down by enemy fire, Pentagon spokesman Col. Rob Manning told reporters.

Operation Inherent Resolve (OIR), the military campaign against ISIS, said in a statement that three other troops were evacuated for medical treatment. It is not known if they are also American.

"All personnel were recovered by Coalition forces immediately following the incident," according to a statement from OIR.

Manning declined to comment further on the crash pending next-of-kin notification.

Spokesman says US will remain there as long as needed: A spokesman for the U.S.-led coalition fighting ISIS said Sunday that American military forces will remain in Iraq to help stabilize the region, Reuters reported

"We'll keep troops there as long as we think they're needed ... The main reason, after ISIS is defeated militarily, is the stabilization efforts and we still need to be there for that, so that's one of the reasons we'll maintain a presence," Col. Sean Ryan reportedly said in Abu Dhabi.

ISIS has been driven out of the country following years of conflict, but about 5,200 U.S. troops are still stationed in Iraq, Ryan said. He added that a drawdown of those troops is possible once NATO forces arrive to help train the Iraqis.



The Senate Armed Services Committee will hold a hearing on the nominations of Alan Shaffer to be Deputy Under Secretary of Defense for acquisition and sustainment; Veronica Daigle to be Assistant Secretary of Defense for readiness and force management; Casey Wardynski to be Assistant Secretary of the Army for manpower and reserve affairs; and Alex Beehler, to be Assistant Secretary of the Army for energy, installations, and environment, at 9:30 a.m. in Dirksen Senate Office Building, room G-50. 

United Kingdom Secretary of State Jeremy Hunt will give a speak and hold a Q&A on foreign policy at 10 a.m., webcast from the U.S. Institute of Peace. 

The full Senate Foreign Relations Committee will hold a hearing on U.S.- Russia relations at 10 a.m. in Dirksen 419. 



-- The Hill: Bolton, Netanyahu huddle on Iran

-- The Hill: Shots fired outside US Embassy in Turkey

-- The Hill: Bomb in deadly Yemen school bus attack was manufactured by US firm: report

-- The Hill: Trump preparing to nominate key military personnel: report

-- The Hill: Iran looking for options on oil sales amid US sanctions: reports

-- The Hill: Senators demand answers on reported lead poisoning at Army bases

--The Hill: Defense Department making $34 million upgrades to two backup presidential aircraft: report

-- The Hill: Opinion: Iran-North Korea meeting -- A message for the US?

-- The Hill: Opinion: Let's not panic over China's military might … just yet

-- Reuters: Pentagon raises alarm about sharp drop in Iraqi refugees coming to U.S.