Coal exports could face roadblocks if Democrats maintain Senate control

Companies that want to export coal to Asia could find roadblocks in their path if Sen. Ron WydenRonald (Ron) Lee WydenWyden blasts FEC Republicans for blocking probe into NRA over possible Russia donations Wyden calls for end to political ad targeting on Facebook, Google Ex-CIA chief worries campaigns falling short on cybersecurity MORE (D-Ore.) becomes chairman of the Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.

Exporters have identified five ports in Oregon and Washington from which to send coal to Asia. Nations in that region, which have rapidly expanding economies and loose environmental standards, are a coveted destination for coal producers as use of the fossil fuel drops in the United States.


But Wyden, who is expected to replace retiring Sen. Jeff Bingaman (D-N.M.) as committee chairman if Democrats retain the Senate, is skeptical about sending coal abroad. He has called for more rigorous environmental reviews of each terminal proposal, which many say could hold up coal exports from the Pacific Northwest.

Wyden wants the Army Corps of Engineers to consider the environmental impact of mining and transporting coal on a more stringent standard, rather than the current plan.

“Senator Wyden believes federal regulators need to take a close look at the economic and environmental impacts of these coal export proposals,” Keith Chu, Wyden’s spokesman, told The Hill. “Oregonians in Morrow and St. Helens and Coos Bay, as well as those in communities along the transportation routes, have a right to know how these developments will affect them, sooner rather than later.”

Much of that coal would come from the Powder River Basin in Wyoming and Montana. Wyden said he is concerned about the impact that activity could have, and also about coal dust settling in communities along the transportation route.

The Environmental Protection Agency also has raised concerns about coal dust, diesel pollution and the effect exports would have on Asian greenhouse gas emissions.

Republican Wyoming Sens. John BarrassoJohn Anthony BarrassoIf Democrats want gun control, they must first concede defeat Conway: Republican concerns about gun reform 'all reconcilable' Five proposals Congress is eyeing after mass shootings MORE and Mike EnziMichael (Mike) Bradley EnziThe 23 Republicans who opposed Trump-backed budget deal On The Money: Fed poised to give Trump boost with rate cut | Parties unable to reach deal in Trump tax return lawsuit | New York opens investigation into Capital One data breach Outgoing Senate Budget chair unveils plans to replace Budget Committee MORE say the more rigorous environmental analysis Wyden seeks would “set a dangerous precedent.”

“[E]xpanding the scope of or delaying the environmental review process for new port facilities would create uncertainty for ongoing and future exports of coal from the Powder River Basin as well as Ohio, Virginia, Pennsylvania, Illinois, Kentucky, and West Virginia,” the senators told Interior Secretary Ken Salazar and Army Secretary John McHugh in an August letter.

The U.S. Energy Information Administration said Wednesday that coal exports rose 24 percent in the first six months of the year. Exports to Asia experienced a small increase, but insiders said that is largely due to the lack of Pacific Northwest export terminals.

The coal export issue has so far failed to resonate in Idaho, through which all Powder River Basin coal would need to pass to get to Pacific Northwest ports, an aide for Sen. James Risch (R-Idaho) told The Hill.

That could change, the aide said, especially with a Wyden chairmanship, and if Sen. Maria CantwellMaria Elaine CantwellNative American advocates question 2020 Democrats' commitment Hillicon Valley: Trump reportedly weighing executive action on alleged tech bias | WH to convene summit on online extremism | Federal agencies banned from buying Huawei equipment | Lawmakers jump start privacy talks Lawmakers jump-start talks on privacy bill MORE (D-Wash.) is still on the committee. The two would likely seek to bring the issue to light because their constituents are asking for it, the aide said.

The Risch aide said the power of the gavel would give Wyden license to call however many hearings he wants on the issue.

That would impede progress on coal exports through the Pacific Northwest, an official with industry group American Coalition for Clean Coal Electricity (ACCCE) told The Hill.

Lauri Hennessey, a spokeswoman for the Alliance for Northwest Jobs and Exports, which supports the ports, said the issue is starting to gain traction in the Pacific Northwest, putting Democrats in a tough spot as union groups butt heads with environmentalists.

She said Wyden’s “unprecedented” request for the more intensive environmental analysis could be viewed as a way to stall progress on the ports.

“The challenge is that this will be determined by the Corps of Engineers,” she told The Hill. “And while Sen. Wyden is very well respected, he is not the head of the Corps of Engineers.”

Though generally viewed as easy to work with, Wyden might try to make political hay of a bread-and-butter issue for his constituents, the ACCCE official said. And he’ll have a partner in the White House if Obama gets reelected, the official said.

Wyden already has pressed Obama on coal exports through the Pacific Northwest.

Wyden and Rep. Edward MarkeyEdward (Ed) John MarkeyJoseph Kennedy mulling primary challenge to Markey in Massachusetts Overnight Energy: Trump sparks new fight over endangered species protections | States sue over repeal of Obama power plant rules | Interior changes rules for ethics watchdogs To cash in on innovation, remove market barriers for advanced energy technologies MORE (D-Mass.) told Obama in a May letter that he should employ executive power to halt energy exports to allow more time for economic and environmental studies.

The Democratic lawmakers cited the Energy Policy and Conservation Act of 1975, which permits preventing energy exports if they conflict with national interest.

“We believe it is critical that you exercise this authority,” Wyden and Markey said, citing potential energy price increases and harm to public health.

This story was updated at 7:54 a.m. to reflect the type of environmental review Sen. Wyden seeks.