Paul blocks chemical safety bill in Senate

Paul blocks chemical safety bill in Senate
© Francis Rivera

Sen. Rand PaulRandal (Rand) Howard PaulOn The Money: House votes to avert shutdown, fund government through November | Judge blocks California law requiring Trump tax returns | Senate panel approves three spending bills Paul objection snags confirmation of former McConnell staffer Defense bill talks set to start amid wall fight MORE (R-Ky.) on Thursday said he’s blocking quick consideration of the Senate’s chemical safety overhaul bill because he hasn’t had time to read it.

Paul said the Frank R. Lautenberg Chemical Safety for the 21st Century Act is a big, consequential bill, and he deserves the time to read and understand it before he votes.

ADVERTISEMENT

The bill has widespread bipartisan support. It passed the House on Tuesday with only 12 members opposing.

Paul’s action doesn’t doom the bill, but the Senate now has to wait at least two weeks to go through the procedure to consider the bill without his consent, because the chamber is in recess next week.

 

Republican leaders had hoped to hold a vote on the chemical legislation Thursday, but needed unanimous consent to do so.

“One of the pledges I made to the people of Kentucky when I came here was that I would read the bills,” Paul said on the Senate floor Thursday.

“This bill came here on Tuesday. It's 180 pages long. It involves new criminalization, new crimes that will be created at the federal level. It includes preemption of states,” the former presidential candidate added.

“And so I think it deserves to be read, to be understood and to be debated, and so I object to just rushing this through and saying ‘Oh, you can't read the bill.’ ”

As long as Paul keeps his objection in place, Sen. Mitch McConnellAddison (Mitch) Mitchell McConnellOvernight Energy: California, 23 other states sue Trump over vehicle emissions rule | Climate strike protests hit cities across globe | Interior watchdog expands scope of FOIA investigation | Dems accuse officials of burying climate reports Hillicon Valley: Lawmakers say Zuckerberg to 'cooperate' on antitrust probes | Dems see victory after McConnell backs election security funds | Twitter takes down fake pro-Saudi accounts Liberal super PAC launches browser extension replacing 'Mitch McConnell' with 'Moscow Mitch' MORE (R-Ky.) cannot have the unanimous consent he needs to allow a vote on the bill Thursday.

It’s unclear whether Paul’s objection is the only one holding up quick consideration of the legislation.

The bill would update the 1976 Toxic Substances Control Act and give the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) sweeping new powers to order the testing of and limit the sales of harmful chemicals.

Sen. David VitterDavid Bruce VitterGrocery group hires new top lobbyist Lobbying World Senate confirms Trump judge who faced scrutiny over abortion views MORE (R-La.), a lead author of the bill, criticized Paul for his objection.

“I regret an objection to this very reasonable path forward,” Vitter said after Paul spoke.

“No one objects to all members of the senate reading the bill. I encourage all members of the senate to read the bill,” he continued.

“The final version of the bill has been publicly available for everyone to read, dissect and digest for about a week. It is largely similar to the Senate version that passed months ago to which there was no objection raised.”

Sen. James InhofeJames (Jim) Mountain InhofeNegotiators kick off defense bill talks amid border wall, Iran debates House rejects GOP motion on replacing Pentagon funding used on border wall Republicans wary of US action on Iran MORE (R-Okla.), chairman of the Environment and Public Works Committee, also criticized Paul.

“We know it’s going to pass. That’s not the issue,” he said. “It’s just that if we could do it now instead of two weeks from now.”

— Updated at 2:32 p.m.