Libertarian candidate backs carbon ‘fee’

Libertarian candidate backs carbon ‘fee’
© Moriah Ratner

Libertarian presidential candidate Gary JohnsonGary Earl JohnsonState polling problematic — again Where Biden, Trump stand in key swing states Amash decides against Libertarian campaign for president MORE is supporting a “fee” on carbon dioxide emissions, a policy more closely associated with environmentalists and liberals.

Johnson, formerly a Republican and the governor of New Mexico, told the Juneau Empire that he believes greenhouse gases cause climate change, and a carbon fee could be “a free-market approach to climate change.”

ADVERTISEMENT

“We as human beings want to see carbon emissions reduced significantly,” he told the newspaper, adding that the United States represents a small portion of worldwide emissions, and “I don’t want to do anything that harms jobs.”

Johnson was cautious not to call it a “carbon tax,” the more widely used term for a government levy on carbon dioxide emissions.

A spokesman for Johnson’s campaign clarified Tuesday that the candidate only supports a carbon fee if current regulations on greenhouse gases were repealed.

“Gov. Johnson’s reference to a carbon fee was in the context of the fact that inconsistent, costly, unpredictable and increasing regulations on carbon emissions already constitute a substantial tax,” spokesman Joe Hunter said in a statement.

“However, it is a tax that is not transparent, creates uncertainty in the marketplace, is imposed in the form of higher prices, and may or may not be producing benefits in the form of reduced greenhouse gases.”

He added that “as part of a larger, comprehensive shift from hidden and unpredictable regulatory taxes to a more free market, consumer-driven approach, a transparent and revenue-neutral fee could very well achieve reduced emissions, which Americans clearly desire, more effectively and at less cost to consumers.”

Environmentalists have been pushing for years for government policies to charge polluters for greenhouse gas emissions, either through a carbon tax or cap and trade.

Most Democrats support the proposals, but they are opposed by Republicans and most of the fossil fuel industry, which have labeled a carbon tax as an unnecessary additional cost on energy.

Republican candidate Donald TrumpDonald John TrumpNew Bob Woodward book will include details of 25 personal letters between Trump and Kim Jong Un On The Money: Pelosi, Mnuchin talk but make no progress on ending stalemate | Trump grabs 'third rail' of politics with payroll tax pause | Trump uses racist tropes to pitch fair housing repeal to 'suburban housewife' Biden commemorates anniversary of Charlottesville 'Unite the Right' rally: 'We are in a battle for the soul of our nation' MORE is sharply opposed to a carbon tax, and while Democrat Hillary ClintonHillary Diane Rodham ClintonThe Hill's Campaign Report: Biden, Harris make first public appearance as running mates Trump campaign spox rips GOP congressman over rejection of QAnon conspiracy Biden hits back after Trump's attacks on Harris MORE hasn’t proposed one, her aides have said she’d be open to discussing the idea.