GOP senators push back on calls to investigate Pruitt

GOP senators push back on calls to investigate Pruitt
 
Key Republicans overseeing the EPA and its budget are resisting calls from Democrats and environmentalists to open new investigations or hold hearings on a number of recent scandals connected to Pruitt.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
Instead, Republicans are deferring to the White House, which is investigating various allegations against Pruitt, including his use of a $50-a-night condo from the wife of a prominent energy lobbyist and overspending taxpayer money on a round-the-clock security team and first-class travel. 
 
The EPA’s Inspector General, the Government Accountability Office and the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee are additionally working on their own investigations into various ethical questions surrounding Pruitt.
 
Sen. John BarrassoJohn Anthony BarrassoCongress averts shutdown after vaccine mandate fight Sunday shows - Spotlight shifts to omicron variant Barrasso calls Biden's agenda 'Alice in Wonderland' logic: 'He's the Mad Hatter' MORE (R-Wyo.), chairman of the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee — the Senate committee which would likely take the lead in an investigation of Pruitt if one were to be opened — said he is letting the White House take the lead.
 
“Certain questions have been raised about internal operations of the agency and the administrator’s actions,” he said in a statement Monday. “The White House has indicated it has taken on a formal review of these questions. I will wait for the outcome of that process."
 
The White House announced last week that it’s investigating the various controversies involving Pruitt.
 
However, President TrumpDonald TrumpBaldwin calls Trump criticism following 'Rust' shooting 'surreal' Haley hits the stump in South Carolina Mary Trump files to dismiss Trump's lawsuit over NYT tax story MORE appeared to absolve his Cabinet secretary Saturday, tweeting: “While Security spending was somewhat more than his predecessor, Scott Pruitt has received death threats because of his bold actions at EPA. Record clean Air & Water while saving USA Billions of Dollars. Rent was about market rate, travel expenses OK. Scott is doing a great job!”
 
Nevertheless, Sen. Mike RoundsMike RoundsMcConnell leaves GOP in dark on debt ceiling Overnight Defense & National Security — A new plan to treat Marines 'like human beings' Republicans press Milley over perceived progressive military agenda MORE (R-S.D.), who sits on the Environment and Public Works committee, said he is comfortable letting the White House’s investigation play out.
 
“Under EPW, we have oversight on the agency, and once we find out what the White House comes up with in terms of their investigation, then we can decide whether or not it’s something that gets into the operations of the EPA,” Rounds said. “At this point, we’ll wait until the White House finishes their review.”
 
 
“There’s plenty of rules, regulations, processes for these kinds of issues, whether you’re an elected official or an appointed official. Let that play out,” Daines said.
 
Sen. Lisa MurkowskiLisa Ann MurkowskiCongress should reject H.R. 1619's dangerous anywhere, any place casino precedent Democratic frustration growing over stagnating voting rights bills Graham emerges as go-to ally for Biden's judicial picks MORE (R-Alaska), who chairs the Appropriations Committee subpanel that oversees the EPA’s budget, recognized that the controversies could be hurting the EPA.
 
“If there are questions that are coming up that are detracting you from the responsibilities that you have, those can be issues, yeah. Those can be real concerns,” she said.
 
Murkowski said she’d let the White House take the lead on looking into Pruitt, but she didn’t rule out questioning Pruitt on the matters when he comes before her subcommittee. She has not yet scheduled a hearing with him on the EPA’s fiscal 2019 budget request, but she expects to.
 
“I think that we will have an opportunity through the committee hearings to have these issues be raised,” she said. “If I were the administrator, I’d certainly be prepared to answer anything that may come his way.”
 
White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders confirmed Monday that the investigation is still ongoing. 
 
Democrats have been less willing to let the White House take the reigns. Coming back from a two-week recess, members of Congress on the left have been emphatic that Pruitt should be held accountable for some of these questionable decisions. A group of four Democrats on the House Energy and Commerce Committee Tuesday called for Pruitt to resign.
 
“EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt has become the poster child for the Trump Administration’s shameful culture of corruption.  Pruitt has repeatedly used his position to enrich himself rather than protect the lives of the American people he was appointed to serve,” they wrote in a statement. “His actions have jeopardized EPA’s ability to protect human health and the environment, and the only way to regain the American people’s trust in EPA is for Pruitt to resign immediately.
 
 
“I think there’s a reluctance on the part of a majority that’s in the same party as the White House to put the White House and the administration under the microscope,” he said.
 
“If the shoe were on the other foot, if it were the Obama administration and Gina McCarthyGina McCarthyOvernight Energy & Environment — White House announces new climate office New White House office to develop climate change policies Kerry: Climate summit 'bigger, more engaged, more urgent' than in past MORE were the EPA administrator, the Republican majority would have dragged her in before us, not every day of every week, but probably every week, to address and delve into her misdeeds.”
 
On Tuesday, Carper and Sen. Sheldon WhitehouseSheldon WhitehouseWhat's that you smell in the Supreme Court? The Hill's Morning Report - Ins and outs: Powell renominated at Fed, Parnell drops Senate bid On The Money — Biden sticks with Powell despite pressure MORE (D-R.I.) wrote Barrasso a letter in part requesting he schedule a hearing on Pruitt’s round-the-clock security detail — which recent reports estimate have cost nearly $3 million. 
 
Barrasso declined, saying in a statement that it could threaten Pruitt’s safety.
 
"This is exactly why members should not publicly disclose information that relates to the safety of a cabinet member. It is also why this committee will not hold a hearing on this issue,” Barrasso said in a statement Tuesday.