Pruitt tells senators: ‘I share your concerns about some of these decisions’

Pruitt tells senators: ‘I share your concerns about some of these decisions’
© Greg Nash

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Administrator Scott PruittEdward (Scott) Scott PruittOvernight Energy: EPA to make formal decision on regulating drinking water contaminant | Utility to close coal plant despite Trump plea | Greens say climate is high on 2020 voters’ minds EPA to announce PFAS chemical regulation plans by end of year Court tosses challenge to EPA's exclusion of certain scientists from advisory boards MORE took an early conciliatory tone during a Wednesday Senate hearing in response to questions about his ethical and spending scandals.

Given time by Senate Appropriations Committee subpanel Chairwoman Lisa MurkowskiLisa Ann MurkowskiThe Hill's 12:30 Report — Presented by Kidney Care Partners — Trump escalates border fight with emergency declaration On The Money: Trump declares emergency at border | Braces for legal fight | Move divides GOP | Trump signs border deal to avoid shutdown | Winners, losers from spending fight | US, China trade talks to resume next week The Hill's Morning Report — Presented by the American Academy of HIV Medicine — Trump, Congress prepare for new border wall fight MORE (R-Alaska) to respond to criticisms, Pruitt conceded that some of the controversial decisions were not handled properly.

“Some of the areas of criticism are frankly areas where processes at the agency were not properly instituted to prevent certain abuses from happening,” Pruitt said.

ADVERTISEMENT

“There have been decisions over the last 16 months or so that, as I look back on those decisions, I would not make the same decisions again,” he continued.

He referred specifically to criticisms about a $43,000 soundproof phone booth EPA built in his office, saying, “that was a process where there were not proper controls early to ensure a legal review of the obligation of the agency to inform Congress” and the Government Accountability Office (GAO).

The GAO determined last month that Pruitt violated a law that required the EPA to notify Congress before spending more than $5,000 to furnish Pruitt’s office.

“As the leader of the agency, it is my responsibility” to crack down, Pruitt said.

At a pair of House hearings last month, Pruitt specifically blamed career employees at the EPA for the phone booth, saying he only wanted a secure phone line, but the project ballooned into the booth.

But some of the criticisms are not valid, he said on Wednesday.

“Some of the criticism is unfounded and exaggerated,” Pruitt told senators, saying they came about due to policy-based criticisms.

Sen. Tom UdallThomas (Tom) Stewart UdallHillicon Valley: House panel takes on election security | DOJ watchdog eyes employee texts | Senate Dems urge regulators to block T-Mobile, Sprint deal | 'Romance scams' cost victims 3M in 2018 Dems urge regulators to reject T-Mobile, Sprint merger Dems wary of killing off filibuster MORE (N.M.), the top Democrat on the panel, used his opening remarks to castigate Pruitt on policy, ethics and spending grounds.

“Every day, there seems to be a new scandal, and you at dead center,” Udall said.

“Your tenure at the EPA is a betrayal of the American people. You have used your office to enrich yourself at the expense of the American taxpayer and public health, and such abuses have led to several investigations.”

Sen. Patrick LeahyPatrick Joseph Leahy‘Contingency’ spending in 3B budget deal comes under fire How the border deal came together Winners and losers in the border security deal MORE (Vt.), the top Democrat on the full Appropriations Committee, specifically questioned Pruitt’s need for a 24/7 security detail and to fly first-class on the taxpayer’s dime.

Leahy pointed out that Pruitt and the EPA said he flew first class because of people yelling at him.

“What a silly reason to fly first class,” Leahy said. “Nobody even knows who you are.”