Supreme court to rehear Alaska moose hunter, hovercraft case

Supreme court to rehear Alaska moose hunter, hovercraft case
© Getty Images

The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday agreed to rehear the case of an Alaskan man who sued the National Park Service (NPS) after being removed from a river while using a hovercraft to hunt moose.

The case, brought by John Sturgeon against the NPS in 2011 after he was removed from Alaska's Nation River in the Yukon-Charley Rivers National Preserve, will come before the Supreme Court for a second time after the court rejected a lower court's reasoning against him and sent it back for reconsideration in 2016.


On rehearing the case last fall, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals once again ruled against Sturgeon, arguing that the NPS has the authority to determine how to preserve and protect the river.

The case will determine the federal government's right to ban hovercraft vehicles from national parks, even in areas where the state itself does not ban the use of the vehicles. NPS overall bans hovercraft use due to noise concerns and fear of damage to surrounding ecosystems.

Sen. Lisa MurkowskiLisa Ann MurkowskiOvernight Energy: Green groups sue Trump over Endangered Species Act changes | Bureau of Land Management retirees fight plan to relocate agency | Wildfires in Amazon rainforest burn at record rate Bureau of Land Management retirees fight plan to relocate agency out west The Hill's Morning Report - Progressives, centrists clash in lively Democratic debate MORE (R-Alaska), chairwoman of the Senate Natural Resources Committee, welcomed the lawsuit, saying in a statement that she hoped it would determine that Alaska has the right to determine its own land usages.

"Alaskans needed the Supreme Court to take this case in order to secure our right to reasonable access to Alaska’s lands and waters and undo the damage threatened by the 9th Circuit," Murkowski said Monday.

“I hope the court will again rule for Mr. Sturgeon, reject the flawed reasoning of the 9th Circuit and protect the subsistence rights‎ of Alaska’s first peoples and other rural residents under Katie John.”

Murkowski, along with GOP Alaskan lawmakers Sen. Dan SullivanDaniel Scott SullivanOvernight Defense: Esper sworn in as Pentagon chief | Confirmed in 90-8 vote | Takes helm as Trump juggles foreign policy challenges | Senators meet with woman accusing defense nominee of sexual assault Alarm sounds over census cybersecurity concerns Senate sets new voting record with Iran war measure MORE and Rep. Don YoungDonald (Don) Edwin YoungHouse passes bill requiring CBP to enact safety, hygiene standards GOP scores procedural win by securing more funding to enforce Iran sanctions Ex-GOP lawmakers are face of marijuana blitz MORE, previously wrote an amicus brief in support of Sturgeon when the case first came before the Supreme Court.

The court's hearing comes as agencies under President TrumpDonald John TrumpThe Hill's Campaign Report: Democratic field begins to shrink ahead of critical stretch To ward off recession, Trump should keep his mouth and smartphone shut Trump: 'Who is our bigger enemy,' Fed chief or Chinese leader? MORE have made a number of policy changes favoring state's control of their lands.

Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Scott PruittEdward (Scott) Scott PruittEnvironmentalists renew bid to overturn EPA policy barring scientists from advisory panels Six states sue EPA over pesticide tied to brain damage Overnight Energy: Trump EPA looks to change air pollution permit process | GOP senators propose easing Obama water rule | Green group sues EPA over lead dust rules MORE has consistently embraced the term "cooperative federalism," and the National Park Service more recently showed support of this policy when it proposed a rule to get rid of federal protections on certain animals in Alaskan refuges, including on black bear cubs and wolf pups in their dens.