House panel approves bill to boost park funding

House panel approves bill to boost park funding
© Greg Nash

A House committee voted Thursday to advance a landmark bipartisan bill to boost funding for national parks and public lands, using money from oil drilling and other energy production.

The House Natural Resources Committee passed the bill by voice vote with strong support from both parties.

The Restore Our Parks and Public Lands Act would take half of the federal government’s income from energy production on federal lands and offshore and put it in a fund to pay for maintenance for the National Park Service (NPS) and other agencies.


The measure represents a rare agreement between the GOP, which is cautious about spending new taxpayer money on federal land, and Democrats, who have long advocated for new reliable, long-term funding to plug the nearly $12 billion NPS maintenance backlog.

“We have advocated and we have developed these properties in the past,” Rep. Rob BishopRobert (Rob) William BishopOvernight Energy: McConnell tees up vote on Green New Deal | Centrist Dems pitch alternative to plan | House Republican likens Green New Deal to genocide | Coca-Cola reveals it uses 3M tons of plastic every year House GOP lawmaker says Green New Deal is like genocide Overnight Energy: Solar installations dropped in 2018 | UN report says rising Arctic temperatures 'locked in' | Fiat Chrysler to recall 850K vehicles MORE (R-Utah), the chairman of the Natural Resources Committee, said before the panel’s vote.

“We have a moral responsibility to ensure that we maintain them and that we maintain what we have before we add to that burden. And that’s what this bill attempts to do.”

Rep. Raúl Grijalva (D-Ariz.) also applauded the bill.

“We’ve heard repeatedly in this committee that the National Park system has nearly a $12 billion maintenance backlog. We’ve been talking about it for years and talking about dedicated funding specifically for this problem. This bill provides it,” he said.

The idea to use oil money for parks has been around for decades, in the form of the Land and Water Conservation Fund. Since at least early 2017, Interior Secretary Ryan ZinkeRyan Keith ZinkeOvernight Energy: EPA moves to raise ethanol levels in gasoline | Dems look to counter White House climate council | Zinke cleared of allegations tied to special election Zinke cleared of violating federal rules tied to Pennsylvania special election Overnight Energy: Trump unveils 2020 budget | Plan slashes funds for EPA, Interior and Energy | Interior request highlights border security MORE and lawmakers in both parties have advocated for a new fund for the maintenance backlog, paid for with energy money.

Grijalva and other Democrats had objected to earlier forms of the proposal. As advocated for by Zinke and some in the GOP, the new fund would have potentially incentivized new drilling.

“Today’s bill does not condition money for parks on increased energy production. That was not a trade-off that needed to be made,” he said.

The fund would be capped at $1.3 billion a year, and the annual congressional appropriations would have no influence over its spending. In addition to the NPS, the money could go to the Fish and Wildlife Service, Bureau of Land Management and Bureau of Indian Education schools.

The committee rejected numerous proposed amendments, including 20 from Rep. Garrett Graves (R-La.). He and Rep. Mike JohnsonJames (Mike) Michael JohnsonHouse panel advances bill to expand background checks for gun sales Lawmakers push crackdown on foreign lobbyists House vote fails to quell storm surrounding Steve King MORE (R-La.) feared that the new public lands fund would remove money that would otherwise go to coastal states from offshore drilling.

“This bill threatens to draw from an already overburdened fund. And it’s a fund that, in my state of Louisiana, is crucial to hurricane preparedness and flood-risk mitigation and coastal restoration,” said Johnson.

The amendments would have attached various conditions to the revenue, including that NPS couldn’t spend more than $250 per square foot on any buildings or that no money could be spent until recovery from this this year’s wildfires and Hurricane Florence was complete.

“These are well-thought-out and sound policies. They absolutely advance this legislation in a direction that makes an awful lot of sense,” Graves said before the panel voted down more than a dozen of his proposals in one vote.