Over 100 lawmakers consistently voted against chemical safeguards: report

Over 100 lawmakers consistently voted against chemical safeguards: report
© Getty Images

More than 100 House lawmakers consistently voted for legislation to weaken safeguards against toxic chemicals, according to a recent report by the Environmental Working Group (EWG) Action Fund released Tuesday.

The political arm of the environmental group found in its first scorecard of the voting patterns of lawmakers on chemical policy measures that a number of largely Republican lawmakers voted for measures that aim to weaken chemical standards or place obstacles in front of new chemical protections.

Looking at 17 separate bills and amendments voted on during the 114th and 115th Congresses, the report found that over 100 lawmakers voted for these measures at every chance they got. Additionally, the analysis found that 140 House members voted against toxic chemical safeguards in every of the measured instances. In contrast, 149 members voted consistently for chemical safety protections.

ADVERTISEMENT

"While no president has ever done as much to weaken safeguards for toxic chemicals as Donald TrumpDonald John TrumpActivists highlight Trump ties to foreign autocrats in hotel light display Jose Canseco pitches Trump for chief of staff: ‘Worried about you looking more like a Twinkie everyday’ Dershowitz: Mueller's report will contain 'sins' but no 'impeachable offense' MORE, too many members of Congress have collaborated with the Trump administration or cast votes in favor of policies that reversed or delayed chemical bans, gutted chemical safety rules, rejected sound science, weakened worker and consumer protections, and denied justice to asbestos victims," the report found.

Legislators who EWG say consistently championed legislation that would weaken chemical safeguards include Rep. Jason LewisJason Mark LewisMLB donated to GOP lawmaker who made controversial comments about women, minorities Minnesota New Members 2019 Overnight Health Care — Presented by The Partnership for Safe Medicines — Medicaid expansion gets extra boost from governors' races | Utah's expansion to begin April 1 | GOP lawmaker blames McCain for Dems winning House MORE (R-Minn.), Rep. Doug LaMalfaDouglas (Doug) LaMalfaHouse GOP and Puerto Rico governor agree on statehood vote Over 100 lawmakers consistently voted against chemical safeguards: report Worst-case scenario for House GOP is 70-seat wipeout MORE (R-Calif.) and Rep. John RatcliffeJohn Lee RatcliffeCongress can open the door to true digital service delivery in government Hillicon Valley: Russian-linked hackers may have impersonated US officials | Trump signs DHS cyber bill | Prosecutors inadvertently reveal charges against Assange | Accenture workers protest border enforcement work | App mines crypto for bail bonds McCarthy, other Republicans back Ratcliffe to be next attorney general MORE (R-Texas). All three politicians were among a group that introduced their own bills that in some fashion could make it easier for chemicals to pass regulatory hurdles.

According to EWG Action Fund, Lewis introduced a bill that could require agencies to submit chemical safety plans for congressional review, which the group says could delay or block the implementation of the safeguards.

A spokeswoman for Lewis's office pushed back against the characterization, saying the bill would only affect guidance documents believed to lead to an annual effect of at least $100 million, and that there is "no reason to believe" that chemical safety measures would be one of them.

"It’s no surprise that the EWG, which has a long history of supporting candidates and controversial causes backed by more extreme environmental groups, think that more transparency and taxpayer accountability are negatives," said Lewis in a statement to The Hill.

"EWG has no interest in the open process my legislation provides, they are clearly more interested in putting workers at Pine Bend out of work.”

EWG Action Fund is the advocacy arm of the nonprofit environmental group that focuses on raising money and legislative awareness on a trove of environmental and chemical issues.

Their report also highlighted Republican lawmakers who voted for legislation that would increase chemical standards, including Rep. Dana RohrabacherDana Tyrone RohrabacherRohrabacher eyes new career as a screenwriter after losing reelection Ryan casts doubt on 'bizarre' California election results Democratic gains erasing House GOP in California MORE (R-Calif.) who voted against the farm bill, which included a number of amendments making it easier for pesticides to pass inspection, the group said.

Concerns about chemical safety standards have grown under the Trump administration as the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and other departments move to implement a number of new policies critics say weaken environmental protections.

The EPA this summer has been criticized over its new plans to regulate asbestos. Asbestos is largely not banned on the federal level, but a 2016 law gave the EPA authority to prohibit the carcinogen.

The EPA’s proposal, released in June, was criticized as opening the door to widespread use of asbestos. EPA officials ardently denied the accusations, saying the proposed regulations would effectively ban the substance.

Timothy Cama contributed to this report.

This story was updated 10:30 a.m.