President BidenJoe BidenBiden: Democrats' spending plan is 'a bigger darn deal' than Obamacare Biden says he's open to altering, eliminating filibuster to advance voting rights Biden: Comment that DOJ should prosecute those who defy subpoenas 'not appropriate' MORE’s nominee for assistant secretary of the Army for civil works pledged to ensure that an environmental review of the controversial Dakota Access Pipeline is not politicized.
Sen. Kevin CramerKevin John CramerSenate GOP signals they'll help bail out Biden's Fed chair Lobbying world The Hill's Morning Report - Presented by Facebook - After high drama, Senate lifts debt limit MORE (R-N.D.) asked Michael Connor about the ongoing Environmental Impact Statement (EIS), which was ordered by a federal court in 2020, in a hearing of the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee on Wednesday.
“If you’re confirmed, with this EIS continuing … do I have your commitment that you’ll do everything you can to keep politics out of the EIS process?” Cramer asked.
“Yes, we need to move forward consistent with law and the very clear direction the court has given,” Connor replied. “Those are legal questions and they’re technical questions that need to be followed up. I want to oversee that and understand it given the visibility of the issue and the importance of tribal consultation.”
Judge James Boasberg, an Obama appointee, ordered a full EIS for the pipeline in 2020; however, in March he refused a request by tribal communities to shut down the pipeline while the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers conducts the full review.
Sen. Elizabeth WarrenElizabeth WarrenDemocrats scramble to reach deal on taxes Ethics office warned officials about unnecessary trades Fed imposes tougher rules on financial trades amid scandal MORE (D-Mass.) also questioned Connor on the EIS process for the pipeline in a Tuesday hearing of the Senate Armed Services Committee, saying she was “concerned that the pipeline continues to operate without an environmental review despite the legal requirements.”
Connor assured the Massachusetts Democrat that the process would be conducted in accordance with the law and full tribal consultation, saying “the Corps will be following the law with respect to the directions of the court, and all other applicable laws and policy.”
“Tribal consultation is not a check-the-box exercise, it’s got to be robust [and] meaningful and that means it’s got to be substantive in the interaction with tribes,” he added.