Equilibrium & Sustainability

Equilibrium/ Sustainability — Presented by NextEra Energy — Greenland lost enough ice Tuesday to flood Florida

Getty Images

Today is Friday.  Welcome to Equilibrium, a newsletter that tracks the growing global battle over the future of sustainability. Subscribe here: thehill.com/newsletter-signup

The amount of ice that melted Tuesday in Greenland would be enough to cover the entire state of Florida in two inches of water, CNN reported.

Greenland lost more than 8.5 billion tons of surface mass on that single day, and 18.4 billion tons since Sunday, as the island experiences its most significant melting event of the year, according to the Denmark Meteorological Institute. Though this week’s melt is not as extreme as a similar event that occurred in 2019, the area of the ice sheet that is melting is bigger. 

“In previous decades or centuries, it’s extremely rare to get above freezing temperatures at the summit of Greenland,” Ted Scambos of the University of Colorado’s National Snow and Ice Data Center told CNN.

As Greenland continues to melt, much of the Western U.S. remains in flames — and Northern California’s Pacific Gas and Electric (PG&E) is now facing criminal charges for its role in a regional wildfire last year. Meanwhile, oil companies are promising to spend some of their windfall from rising plastics consumption on a “low-carbon future” — but is it enough to make a difference?  

For Equilibrium, we are Saul Elbein and Sharon Udasin. Please send tips or comments to Saul at selbein@thehill.com or Sharon at sudasin@thehill.com. Follow us on Twitter: @saul_elbein and @sharonudasin

Let’s get to it.


We’re pioneering innovation on green hydrogen — the solution for deep decarbonization of hard-to-abate sectors. See how it can create jobs, accelerate economic growth and more at NextEraEnergy.com.

Across a scorching West, the grid crackles

PG&E is facing criminal charges after a Northern California prosecutor determined that its equipment sparked a deadly wildfire last year — a move that calls into question both the financial and logistical viability of America’s vulnerable power grids.

Shasta County District Attorney Stephanie Bridgett announced on Facebook that her office had found PG&E “criminally liable” for the September 2020 “Zogg Fire” — which ultimately scorched about 87.5 square miles of Sierra Nevada land, killing four and destroying hundreds of homes, The Associated Press reported. 

PG&E called the devastation “heartbreaking” but also said it has already resolved civil claims with Shasta County and is in settlement negotiations with victims “in an effort to make it right,” according to the AP.

What’s going on with PG&E? The company has had a bad few months, and it warned of “probable” financial losses Thursday, as The Mercury News reported, due to the ongoing Dixie fire that was also likely triggered by PG&E equipment. Those losses could occur if the company doesn’t have enough insurance to cover costs associated with the Butte County fire.

Meanwhile, PG&E said it would bury 10,000 miles of transmission lines at a cost of $15 billion to $20 billion.

PG&E stock closed down 3.19 percent to $8.79, according to Market Watch, after experiencing unusually bearish options activity Thursday, Benzinga Insights reported. 

PG&E’s financial problems aren’t new. Survivors of California’s 2018 Camp fire — another PG&E-related fire that forced the firm into bankruptcy — have yet to receive compensation, as we reported.

Past PG&E liabilities have also been linked to fires in Amador and Calaveras counties in 2015 and the North Bay Wine Country in 2017, The Mercury News reported.


Texas feels the heat: This string of liabilities — in which faulty equipment has triggered wildfires — speaks to a systemic issue that America’s outdated electric grids are facing.

Texas’s main grid operator projected that power demand would reach its highest point this year as temperatures rose Friday, according to Reuters. While the operator maintained there was enough supply available to meet demand, Friday’s heat wave came less than six months after a deadly winter storm overwhelmed that same grid and left Texans in the dark for days.

That situation was especially dire because “the Texas power grid is essentially an electrical island” — without federal oversight or power exchange across state lines, as The Wall Street Journal reported.

It’s not just Texas and California. A group of Oregonian homeowners asked the local Eugene Water & Electric Board to turn off their electricity during September’s fire season, fearing that an area storm could ignite more flames, The New York Times reported.

But as storms strike substations around the country, most electricity providers have yet to study how extreme weather could thwart their current setups, according to the Times.

But there are solutions: Caroline Winn, chief executive of San Diego Gas & Electric, told the Times that she has received consultation requests from Oregon to Australia, due to San Diego’s experience deploying technologies such as drone monitors, burying power lines and converting wood poles to steel. 

“This is not only a California problem,” Winn said. “This is a world problem.”

In New York, Con Edison spent $1 billion installing new storm walls, pumps and submersible equipment that could withstand flooding in the aftermath of Hurricane Sandy, while partnering with Columbia University to prepare a climate risk assessment, the Times reported.

Takeaway: Extreme weather events triggered by climate change are outpacing the preparedness of grid operators, leading to significant financial losses — and sometimes, significant losses of life. But by reprioritizing investments and planning schemes, there are tangible steps that these companies can take.


As the world’s largest producer of wind and solar energy, NextEra Energy is pioneering innovation on green hydrogen – the solution for deep decarbonization of hard-to-abate sectors. See how at NextEraEnergy.com.

Rise in oil prices a mixed (plastic) bag for sustainability

A rise in demand for plastic packaging is driving a spike in oil prices that has seen companies like ExxonMobil, Shell and Chevron rebounding from their 2020 losses. Enough money has come pouring in for the companies to start spending it on shareholder dividends and stock buybacks.

But all three oil majors are promising to put some of that money into future investments in low-carbon fuels, carbon capture and other products seen as long-term replacements for fossil fuels.

But they have a long way to go. The technologies they’re investing in remain unproven at scale, Democrats in Congress are skeptical of their sincerity and the American oil sector itself is split over key questions about the future of the industry.

First, the numbers: Exxon had its biggest quarterly earnings in a year, which were driven largely by record-breaking profits in its plastics and chemicals division, which at $2.32 billion this quarter were a fivefold increase from last year, according to Reuters.

It’s a “much-needed lift” for Exxon CEO Darren Woods, who caved to pressure from activist investor Engine No. 1 and multinational firm BlackRock to replace three seats on its board with candidates who promised to oversee the company’s transition to a future dominated by clean energy, according to Bloomberg.

Exxon’s plans “will reflect the continued development and deployment of needed technologies,” Woods said in a conference call with investors Friday, according to the AP. He discussed intentions to work on “developing lower-emission fuels” and to cut emissions from methane leaks in the Permian Basin — a large oil and gas producing region in Texas and New Mexico. Woods also promised to expand Exxon’s carbon capture facilities in Wyoming and to invest in a new carbon storage facility in Scotland.

In this initiative, Exxon mirrors actions taken by other majors, such as Chevron, which the Financial Times reported was setting up a “new energies” line for fuels like hydrogen, and Shell, which told investors that any future spending increases above its current planned $22 billion a year “will go mostly towards low-carbon businesses,” according to Reuters.

So is Big Oil green now? Well, no. That Exxon facility in Scotland, for example, would only store about 5 million metric tons of carbon dioxide per year. That’s less than 5 percent of Exxon’s current annual emissions — which doesn’t account for the actual emissions of the oil being burned. 

Exxon promised to spend $3 billion in new “low-carbon” technologies by 2028, but that’s an average of about $400 million a year — just 0.2 percent of Exxon’s 2020 annual spending.

Problems with plastic: It’s not just a matter of spending. Many of the industry’s cherished solutions are either unproven frontier technologies or have failed to work at scale. 

On Thursday, a Reuters report examined a push in the petroleum industry to recycle plastics by turning them into fuel — and found a cavalcade of failure and collapsed businesses. 

A trade group in the crossfire: The growing pressure from investors on climate change is in tension with the oil industry’s entrenched businesses based on burning carbon — which is dividing the American Petroleum Institute (API), historically an opponent of climate science and the energy transition.

Now it is being pulled in battle among more progressive energy companies, such as Paris-based TotalEnergies, and independents like Marathon, The Wall Street Journal reported. 

The oil sector is riddled with uncertainty and division in the oil sector: TotalEnergies, which has rebranded itself as an electricity provider, left in January because API was not moving fast enough toward the energy transition, the Journal reported. 

Marathon, meanwhile, is considering leaving API over the advocacy of “green policies” by companies like Exxon, according to the Journal. 


Follow-up Friday

In which we check in on news from earlier in the week to see how things have moved on.

School buses are victims of bipartisan infrastructure cuts

  • The latest version of the bipartisan infrastructure bill includes significant compromises in terms of electric vehicle funding, as we reported yesterday — with the $7.5 billion allocated for charging stations amounting to less than 5 percent of what President Biden had initially proposed.
  • Electric vehicle cuts have left many parents frustrated, as the infrastructure package also includes less funding for electric school buses — with just $2.5 billion for 11,000 zero-emissions buses, according to E&E News.
  • While a group of parents in Fairfax County, Va., convinced school district officials to electrify their bus fleet by 2035, most families will have to wait much longer, E&E reported.
  • Pollution levels inside the yellow buses are up to 10 times higher inside than those outside, the report said.

Greeks warned not to work outside in heat wave

  • Western North America isn’t the only place suffering from extreme heat. The Acropolis closed in Athens as temperatures hit 104 degrees, as Greece is plagued by scorching days and “tropical nights,” according to Reuters. Officials warned people to avoid doing “unnecessary” work or traveling outside.
  • “It will be like hell,” an Israeli tourist said of the beaches, which were “so hot you can actually feel it in your skin.” 
  • Meanwhile, as more than 40 wildfires have raged through Greece in the past 24 hours, four people have been killed in wildfires sweeping Turkey’s south coast.
  • Both economies are traditionally dependent on a summer tourist season that faces an increasingly fraught future.

In the EU, a boom in electricity has come without more carbon emissions

  • We wrote yesterday about a new estimate for the danger of carbon emissions. 
  • Though Europe’s electricity demand is back to pre-coronavirus levels, emissions haven’t gone up, the AP reported, as renewable energy has filled the gap.
  • A principal reason: Fossil fuel-based energy has increased in price, while wind and solar have stayed flat.
  • This emphasizes the complex relationship between oil prices and emissions. High prices can incentivize further production, but can also push utilities toward renewables.
  • The difference is whether fossil fuel companies are sufficiently confident in the future of oil, coal and gas to justify developing further supplies that would push prices down.

{mosads}Stanford University has become the latest academic institution to open a dedicated sustainability program. Administrators say that the program aims to “drive new technology and policy solutions” with the establishment of the university’s first new school in 70 years. 

Please visit The Hill’s sustainability section online for the web version of this newsletter and more stories. We’ll see you next week.

Tags Joe Biden

The Hill has removed its comment section, as there are many other forums for readers to participate in the conversation. We invite you to join the discussion on Facebook and Twitter.

Most Popular

Load more


See all Video