Equilibrium & Sustainability

Equilibrium/Sustainability — Presented by Southern Company — Otters plunder Singapore’s pools and paths

iStock

Today is Friday. Welcome to Equilibrium, a newsletter that tracks the growing global battle over the future of sustainability. Subscribe here: thehill.com/newsletter-signup

An obstreperous alliance of otters has taken to the streets of Singapore, attacking passersby and splashing in the city’s pools, The Wall Street Journal reported. 

“It was like somebody stapling my buttocks,” Graham Spencer, who was pinned down to the ground and sustained two dozen otter bites, told the Journal. “If it wasn’t for my friend who was with me, who managed to help me get up, I think I could have been seriously hurt or killed.”

While just a few years ago the return of otters to Singapore’s waterways was lauded as a conservation success story, the animals — who number about 150 — are now receiving bad press for diving into condo swimming pools, disturbing residents and biting people in gardens and on paths, according to the Journal.  

Today we’ll look at measures Sen. Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.) is still carving from his party’s signature legislative package. Then we’ll head to Boulder, Colo., and take a look at an electric vehicle charging pilot project.

For Equilibrium, we are Saul Elbein and Sharon Udasin. Please send tips or comments to Saul at selbein@thehill.com or Sharon at sudasin@thehill.com. Follow us on Twitter: @saul_elbein and @sharonudasin

Let’s get to it.

Manchin whittles down Build Back Better

Sen. Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.) is opposing an offshore oil drilling ban in the text of the Biden Build Back Better spending bill — his latest in a series of objections that now means the bill is likely to be shelved through the end of the year, if not later.

The pushback comes amid lobbying efforts from right-leaning business interests to kill the bill.

First steps: After objections by Manchin, Democrats stripped proposals to ban new offshore drilling off the Atlantic, Gulf and Pacific coasts from the $2.2 trillion Build Back Better legislation, The New York Times reported.

Big picture: The ban would have brought the country a step closer to the measures urged by energy markets watchdog International Energy Agency, which said in May that new oil and gas drilling must cease immediately to maintain a chance of keeping global warming below 1.5 Celsius (2.7 Fahrenheit), as The Hill reported.

The ban’s defeat is another trophy for Manchin: The senator, a representative of a coal and gas state who made his fortune in coal, has steadily weakened his party’s signature social policy and climate change bill, the Times noted. 

His opposition led to the rejection of the Clean Energy Purchase Program, which would have paid bonuses to power utilities — the country’s largest carbon emitter — that switched to ever-increasing renewables and punished those who did not, The Times reported.

Manchin has also opposed: Build Back Better provisions fining gas producers for releasing unabated methane — a greenhouse gas up to 80 times more potent than carbon dioxide, as well as tax credits for union-made electric vehicles, The Hill reported.

BBB ON THE SHELF THROUGH CHRISTMAS

Attempts by President Biden to get Manchin to commit to a bill he would vote for were “going very poorly,” Politico reported on Wednesday. 

On Thursday, President Biden announced that the bill would be put aside until after the Christmas recess, but that he wanted to see it passed “as soon as Congress returns” in January, The Hill reported.

The U.S. Chamber of Commerce and the West Virginia Chamber have bought TV ads across West Virginia in which residents thank Manchin for “fighting for my business,” as one woman puts it, and encouraging him to reject the reconciliation package entirely, saying “we can’t afford higher taxes and any more inflation.”

“Keep fighting for us, senator,” another person in the ad says. “We can’t afford higher taxes and more inflation.”

Sen. Lindsay Graham (R-S.C.) told Sean Hannity on Fox that BBB was likely dead, because “he doesn’t want to vote for a bill that makes inflation worse.”

The ‘inflation’ line is a tell, progressives argue: Renewable energy analyst David Roberts wrote on Twitter that “voters are not primarily responding to inflation, they are responding to a massive, highly coordinated propaganda campaign across multiple media designed to freak them out about inflation.”

Does that mean concerns over inflation aren’t real? No — it means they are part of a specific line of political argument with specific aims, economist J.W. Mason argued in New York Magazine.

“One hundred percent of what we’re calling inflation today” comes from rising prices of cars and fossil fuels, Mason said, “and neither of those phenomena has anything to do with the money supply,” a potential driver of inflation which has been the source of Manchin’s principal objections to the BBB, New York Magazine reported.

Biden says he’s optimistic: “Senator Manchin has reiterated his support for Build Back Better funding at the level of the framework plan I announced in September,” the White House wrote in a statement on Thursday evening. 

“I believe that we will bridge our differences and advance the Build Back Better plan, even in the face of fierce Republican opposition.”

 

A MESSAGE FROM SOUTHERN COMPANY

At Southern Company, we achieved our interim net zero energy goal ten years early. Today, we continue our work toward a net zero future. Learn more.

A shift in car charging habits 

A rollout of President Biden’s proposed network of 500,000 electric vehicle (EV) charging stations must be paired with a “paradigm shift” in the way Americans view driving, a House lawmaker said this week. 

First words: “I’ve spent my entire life, as a child, with a sort of pre-existing infrastructure in my mind — gas stations on every corner, right?” Rep. Joe Neguse (D-Colo.) told reporters during a tour of an EV charging pilot project in his home district on Thursday.

“My daughter, who’s three, by the time she’s my age,” he continued, “one would hope that every one of those gas stations is replaced by a charging network.”

“Vehicle-to-building” charging: The Colorado project, which enables a two-way transfer of electricity between a car and a building, allows a vehicle to be charged through the system when energy demand is minimal while sending power back to the building during peak hours.

The City of Boulder has tested the system using a Nissan Leaf from its fleet connected to a local recreation center. The project is a joint partnership between Boulder and Virginia-based Fermata Energy, which produces “vehicle-to-building” charging systems. 

What does that mean? “We charge the vehicle at night when there’s very low demand,” said Jonathan Koehn, director of climate initiatives for the City of Boulder. 

“During the day, when we see a lot of electricity demand at the site, we can actually pull off of those batteries and shave that demand,” he added. 

How much does it shave off? Over the past year, this setup has saved about 15-20 kilowatts each month, which amounts to about $250 on the Center’s monthly electric bill, according to Koehn.

“That may not seem extraordinary,” Koehn said. “But if we think about the scaling opportunity there, it’s pretty extraordinary.”

A replicable model: Cities could integrate these systems in their vehicle fleets, while homeowners could generate savings on their electricity bills, Koehn explained. Such bidirectional capabilities could also contribute to climate resilience needs, if such city vehicles were used to supply shelters or emergency operations centers with a “mobile power plant,” he added.

Harnessing federal funds at a local level: The recently approved bipartisan infrastructure bill allocates $7.5 billion for establishing the charging network, including $5 billion for states — of which $57 million is going to Colorado. 

The funds, Neguse explained, will be used to both expand conventional charging infrastructure and launch more pilot programs like the one at the Recreation Center.

RECONSIDERING ‘CHARGING BEHAVIOR’

Critics have questioned how the Biden administration will realize its vision, particularly after an initial proposal to devote $15 billion to the network was slashed in half. Media reports have indicated that to do so, the network might need to use slower “Level 2” chargers.

Charging levels:

  • Level 1: a 120-volt alternate current (AC) plug at home; can replenish about 40 miles of range in about eight hours, according to the Department of Energy.
  • Level 2: a 240-volt AC at home or in public spaces; can fully charge car overnight
  • DC Fast Charging: direct-current chargers situated along traffic corridors; can add 60-80 miles of range per 20 minutes.

Level 2 chargers can each cost up to $2,793 to install, while DC Fast chargers can each cost up to $140,000, according to International Council on Clean Transportation estimates. 

So which chargers will be used? Neguse said he doesn’t have a firm answer as to which types of chargers will be prioritized in the Biden administration’s plans. 

But this debate might be missing “a really important social aspect” that Koehn described as “charging behavior” — and the presumption “that everybody is going to charge in the same way.”

In Boulder, Koehn said, he and his team found that many residents prefer what he called a “trickle charge” overnight, and that “slow” chargers are sufficient for this purpose.

What’s ahead? As 2022 begins, Neguse said he expects to see “a pretty robust set of oversight actions” that will push government agencies toward “getting this money out of the doors as quickly as they can.” 

Last words: “The reality is, our job is not done, simply by virtue of enacting the bipartisan infrastructure deal,” Neguse said.

To read the full story, please click here.

 

Follow-up Friday

Another look at issues we’ve explored throughout the week.

‘Forever chemicals’ found in more than half tested wells in Delaware 

  • Earlier this week, we reported about the potential for “forever chemicals” to “boomerang” back to shore via sea spray aerosol, as well as the possibility that officials are underestimating the presence of these compounds — perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances, or PFAS — in U.S. foods. PFAS has also been found to be polluting more than half of water wells tested in Delaware and exceeding federal health guidelines in some, the Environmental Working Group reported, citing the U.S. Geological Survey
  • “As more sampling is done of water supplies in the U.S., it becomes clearer that the contamination is widespread, and often at levels scientists consider unsafe for public health,” Olga Naidenko, EWG’s vice president for science investigations, said in a statement.

Tax credit for US-made electric vehicles will lead to dangerous migration: Mexico

Federal government rolls out first climate risk requirement

  • We wrote on Thursday about how the oil industry is raising its own climate risks. Now the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) has proposed the first ever climate risk requirements for the banks that provide this industry with capital, our colleague Zack Budryk reported in The Hill.
  • The measure “takes the foundational step of recognizing that climate-related risk can threaten the safety and soundness of individual banks and the whole financial system,” which gives OCC broad latitude to act, David Arkush, director of Public Citizen’s climate program, said.

 

A MESSAGE FROM SOUTHERN COMPANY

 

At Southern Company, we achieved our interim net zero energy goal ten years early. Today, we continue our work toward a net zero future. Learn more.

That’s it for today. Please visit The Hill’s sustainability section online for the web version of this newsletter and more stories. We’ll see you Friday.
{mosads}

Tags Joe Biden Joe Manchin Joe Neguse Sean Hannity

The Hill has removed its comment section, as there are many other forums for readers to participate in the conversation. We invite you to join the discussion on Facebook and Twitter.

Most Popular

Load more

Video

See all Video