Policymakers looking for a deficit deal to raise the $14.3 trillion debt ceiling have discussed linking the tax code and benefit payments to the so-called “chained” consumer price index – which, generally speaking, finds a slower rate of inflation than the current method of calculating the CPI.
Supporters of the chained CPI say it better reflects changes in consumer spending habits, such as the fact that people drive less when gas prices rise or that consumers are more likely to buy oranges when the prices of apples increases.
Changes in, among other things, income tax deductions and the cost-of-living adjustment for Social Security are tied to the consumer price index. So switching to the chained CPI, then, would lead to lower Social Security payouts and smaller income tax deductions.
The president’s fiscal commission recommended switching to the chained CPI, and House Speaker John BoehnerJohn Andrew BoehnerLobbying world A new kind of hero? Last week's emotional TV may be a sign GOP up in arms over Cheney, Kinzinger MORE (R-Ohio) said in recent weeks that the idea had some “merit.”
Democrats concerned about Social Security are not the only ones concerned about chained CPI, either. The anti-tax crusader Grover Norquist and the libertarian Cato Institute are among those who oppose the idea because of its effect on the tax code, with Cato calling it a “stealth tax increase.”
According to the JCT report, linking the individual tax code to chained CPI would raise $12.2 billion between 2012 and 2016, before eventually bringing in $12.4 billion in 2021.
In 2013, more than half of the new revenues would come from those making $100,000 or more a year. In fact, taxpayers making between $100,000 and $200,000 account for more than a quarter of the new revenues themselves.
But by 2021, almost 70 percent of the new revenues would come from those making $100,000 or less. Those making between $50,000 and $75,000 would contribute almost a quarter of those new revenues.