The Senate Budget Committee voted Thursday to boost a war funding account in the GOP budget next year to $96 billion, which would match the amount House Republicans are seeking in their own plan.
Members of the panel adopted the amendment, offered by Sens. Lindsey GrahamLindsey Olin GrahamSenators preview bill to stop tech giants from prioritizing their own products Democrats fret as longshot candidates pull money, attention Tim Scott takes in .3 million in third quarter MORE (R-S.C.) and Kelly AyotteKelly Ann AyotteBiden likely to tap Robert Califf to return as FDA head Poll: Potential Sununu-Hassan matchup in N.H. a dead heat Democrats facing tough reelections back bipartisan infrastructure deal MORE (R-N.H.), during a marathon markup. It passed by a party-line vote.
The Senate budget that was unveiled a day earlier only included $58 billion for the war account, known as the Overseas Contingency Operations (OCO) fund. That’s the amount President Obama asked Congress to provide for next year.
Graham said in order to add the extra $38 billion to get $96 billion, Congress would need to find savings outside the budget’s 10-year window.
Ranking member Bernie SandersBernie SandersSanders, Manchin escalate fight over .5T spending bill Sanders blames media for Americans not knowing details of Biden spending plan Briahna Joy Gray: Proposals favored by Black voters 'first at the chopping block' in spending talks MORE (I-Vt.) slammed the proposal as a “budget gimmick."
“What they’re saying is, ‘Let’s spend $38 billion more on defense, but let’s not count that against the deficit,' ” he added.
Sen. Pat Toomey (R-Pa.), who’s up for reelection in 2016, said he would “reluctantly support the amendment” and offered a separate one that would prevent the war fund increase from being carried over into any year after fiscal 2016.
It could face an obstacle though. Chairman Mike EnziMichael (Mike) Bradley EnziCheney on same-sex marriage opposition: 'I was wrong' What Republicans should demand in exchange for raising the debt ceiling Senate votes to end debate on T infrastructure bill MORE’s (R-Wyo.) plan imposes a 60-vote point of order against any legislation requesting more than $58 billion for OCO.
The fund has been used to finance the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and now is paying for military operations against the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria (ISIS). The account falls outside of the base budget and Republicans are relying on it to make up for the defense sequester.
In the House, the GOP’s current budget blueprint would increase OCO to about $90 billion for next year. Fiscal and defense hawks, however, went head to head late Wednesday over whether that amount required offsets.
House GOP leaders want to increase the fund before the budget hits the floor next week to the $96 billion Graham is calling for, and without any offsets.
Both nonbinding blueprints stick to sequestration budget caps created by a 2011 law that are set to return in October.
If both resolutions contain the same overall funding levels, including OCO, it could make striking a conference agreement even easier. That only can happen if each budget is approved by its chamber next week.