Conservatives fear end-of-year ‘Christmas tree’ spending bill

Conservatives fear end-of-year ‘Christmas tree’ spending bill
© Getty Images

Conservatives are growing worried that an end-of-year spending bill will be loaded up with extraneous, expensive provisions as lawmakers rush to prevent a government shutdown and get home for the holidays next month.

“Loading up the Christmas tree right before the end of the year is never good,” said Rep. Dave Brat (R-Va.), a member of the conservative House Freedom Caucus. “Push it off to next year, there’s too much in flux right now.”

“Once people get ready to get out the door, a lot of things become acceptable that wouldn’t in other seasons,” added Rep. Mark SanfordMarshall (Mark) Clement SanfordEndorsing Trump isn’t the easiest decision for some Republicans Mark Sanford warns US could see ‘Hitler-like character’ in the future House passes year-end tax package MORE (R-S.C.), another Freedom Caucus member.

Democrats are demanding a series of concessions for Republicans to get their votes on the bill, including language to protect young immigrants who received work permits under the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program that President Trump is winding down.

Republicans are likely to need Democratic votes in both the House and Senate to win passage of legislation to fund the government.

Complicating matters further is the fact that if Congress doesn’t approve a new law setting limits on spending by late January, automatic spending cuts known as sequestration are set to be imposed under an earlier budget law.

This means that if Congress approves a continuing resolution to keep existing government funding in place — a typical move for lawmakers when they can’t come to an agreement — big cuts will be implemented for the Pentagon and domestic programs.

Democrats are insisting that any increase in defense spending be matched, dollar-for-dollar, with increases in nondefense spending.

Earlier this year, when Congress approved a spring bill to fund the government through the last fiscal year, Democrats agreed to a deal that did not match defense spending for nondefense spending.

They are now signaling they want to make up for that fact in the new fight.

“We are also focused on resolving the spending issues going forward for 2018, particularly the parity between defense and domestic spending, so there are a lot of things to be discussed,” House Minority Whip Steny HoyerSteny Hamilton HoyerOn unilateral executive action, Mitch McConnell was right — in 2014 Dems ready aggressive response to Trump emergency order, as GOP splinters Winners and losers in the border security deal MORE (D-Md.) said Wednesday.

The so-called four corners — Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnellAddison (Mitch) Mitchell McConnellGOP Green New Deal stunt is a great deal for Democrats The national emergency will haunt Republicans come election season Trump: McConnell should keep Senate in session until nominees are approved MORE (R-Ky.), Senate Minority Leader Charles SchumerCharles (Chuck) Ellis SchumerGOP Green New Deal stunt is a great deal for Democrats National emergency declaration — a legal fight Trump is likely to win House Judiciary Dems seek answers over Trump's national emergency declaration MORE (D-N.Y.), House Speaker Paul RyanPaul Davis RyanUnscripted Trump keeps audience guessing in Rose Garden Coulter defends Paul Ryan: This is 100 percent Trump's fault The Hill's 12:30 Report — Presented by Kidney Care Partners — Trump escalates border fight with emergency declaration MORE (R-Wis.), and House Minority Leader Nancy PelosiNancy Patricia D'Alesandro PelosiThe national emergency will haunt Republicans come election season On unilateral executive action, Mitch McConnell was right — in 2014 National emergency declaration — a legal fight Trump is likely to win MORE (D-Calif.) — have begun meetings with the White House to hammer out a deal.

Ryan, however, has acknowledged a short-term deal may be necessary to keep the government open past Dec. 8, when a current spending agreement runs out.

That would keep lawmakers in Washington closer to Christmas trying to hammer out a deal for the next fiscal year.

The idea that a legislative solution for the DACA program could be included in the bill in the rush to leave Washington is a particular concern for some Republicans.

“DACA is a serious issue, we should find some serious solutions on it. Not rush, jam something through,” said Brat.

It’s also a top priority for Democrats, who seem unlikely to agree to any spending bill that does not provide support for young undocumented immigrants brought to the U.S. as children. Many could face deportation in March unless a fix is made.

Pelosi and Sen. Kamala HarrisKamala Devi HarrisSenate Dems introduce bill to prevent Trump from using disaster funds to build wall Klobuchar, O'Rourke visit Wisconsin as 2020 race heats up Sherrod Brown pushes for Medicare buy-in proposal in place of 'Medicare for all' MORE (D-Calif.) are among the Democrats who have said the party should withhold votes for a funding bill unless a DACA deal is reached.

Democrats could potentially force the issue on the short-term spending bill, though aides say they are more inclined to hold out for an agreement related to the larger, long-term spending bill.

“We certainly have an opportunity, and I haven’t talked to the majority leader about that, and I’ll want to see what he says, but I will tell you that we are very focused on DACA,” Hoyer said.

Another factor could be legislation to fund ObamaCare payments to insurers meant to help people buy insurance.

On Wednesday, Sen. John CornynJohn CornynOn unilateral executive action, Mitch McConnell was right — in 2014 Poll shows competitive matchup if O’Rourke ran for Senate again On The Money: Trump declares emergency at border | Braces for legal fight | Move divides GOP | Trump signs border deal to avoid shutdown | Winners, losers from spending fight | US, China trade talks to resume next week MORE (R-Texas) said that the year-end spending bill would also likely include these cost-sharing subsidies.

On defense spending, the House this week approved a $692 billion authorization package with bipartisan support, making that figure a likely starting point for appropriators.

The bill represents a $77.4 billion increase from caps set in law for 2018.

If Democrats get their way, nondefense spending would increase by the same amount, from the $516 billion cap in law to $593.4 billion.

Either increase on its own would bust the deficit wide open.

“The fiscal stability of the country and its national security environment are the two wings that hold up this airplane. To pit these two things against each other is a terrible mistake,” said conservative Rep. Trent FranksHarold (Trent) Trent FranksArizona New Members 2019 Cook shifts 8 House races toward Dems Freedom Caucus members see openings in leadership MORE (R-Ariz.).

“For the fiscal hawks and the defense hawks, and I’m both, for us to go to war with each other is to decimate the country,” he added.

Either way, Franks said, the process was subpar.

“The process itself almost precipitates a dirt and ice cream kind of outcome,” he said.