US and Canada working furiously to come to NAFTA agreement

US and Canada working furiously to come to NAFTA agreement

The U.S. and Canada are working furiously to reach an agreement by Sunday, a self-imposed deadline to complete an updated North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA).

President TrumpDonald John TrumpGraham to introduce resolution condemning House impeachment inquiry Support for impeachment inches up in poll Fox News's Bret Baier calls Trump's attacks on media 'a problem' MORE was prepared to give up on the weekend deadline with Canada because the United States and its largest trading partner still had major issues left to resolve. 

ADVERTISEMENT

Instead, the White House and Mexico on Friday held off on releasing the text of a Mexico-only deal as negotiations ramped up between the U.S. and Canada in an effort to meet the deadline. 

Behind the scenes, U.S. and Canadian trade negotiators had been pushing forward on talks all week. Then on Saturday, Canadian Foreign Minister Chrystia Freeland canceled her scheduled speech before the United Nations to head back to Ottawa to work with her trade team. 

Meanwhile, Canadian officials had reported talks as "intense" but they were still cautious about a breakthrough by the end of the weekend, according to news reports. 

The nations are rushing to complete the three-nation deal so it can be signed by Mexican President Enrique Peña Nieto before he leaves office on Dec. 1. 

His successor, the newly elected, left-leaning Andrés Manuel López Obrador may demand further negotiations once he takes office.

Trump touted the deal with Mexico during a rally in West Virginia on Saturday night and said he'll see what happens with Canada but "they have to come along."

But pushing the deadline carries risks beyond Mexican politics.
 
Under the president’s existing trade promotion authority, the administration must make public the text of any new treaty 60 days before it is signed
 
Congressional Republicans, who met with U.S. Trade Representative Robert LighthizerRobert (Bob) Emmet LighthizerPelosi sounds hopeful on new NAFTA deal despite tensions with White House On The Money: Economy adds 164K jobs in July | Trump signs two-year budget deal, but border showdown looms | US, EU strike deal on beef exports Chinese, US negotiators fine-tuning details of trade agreement: report MORE Thursday, said Canada’s inclusion in the deal is important, but they seemed intent on strengthening Trump’s negotiating position by threatening to approve a Canada-free deal if Ottawa doesn't join. 

“I think the window is closing rapidly on Canada to be part of this, and if they want to run the risk of not being part of an agreement with Mexico and us, that’s something they need to recognize is going to be a reality here in the very near future,” said Rep. Tom ReedThomas (Tom) W. ReedNo Labels' fight against partisanship 25 years of championing successful community development Overnight Health Care — Presented by Partnership for America's Health Care Future — Walmart to stop selling e-cigarettes | Senators press FDA to pull most e-cigarettes immediately | House panel tees up e-cig hearing for next week MORE (R-N.Y.), a member of the House Ways and Means Committee, which oversees trade policy.

But others noted that a Canada-free NAFTA would put a drag on the U.S. economy. Trump has threatened to slap auto tariffs on cars coming in from Canada, a move that would hit U.S. automakers and auto parts dealers.

“I think it could be very damaging for many industries that work profusely, primarily with Canada,” said Rep. Mark WalkerBradley (Mark) Mark WalkerGOP lawmakers offer new election security measure California inspires other states to push to pay college athletes To boost minority serving institutions, bipartisan Future Act needs immediate action MORE (R-N.C.).   

Business groups have been steadfast in saying they won’t back a deal without Canada.

Bryan Riley, director of the Free Trade Initiative at the National Taxpayers Union, said that a revised NAFTA agreement "that does not include Canada should be a non-starter for American taxpayers, consumers and businesses.”

“It is an immense failure not to secure Canada’s participation,” Riley said on Friday.

Meanwhile, U.S. Chamber of Commerce President and CEO Thomas Donohue said recently that “if Canada doesn’t come into the deal, there is no deal.”

Congress has flexibility with fast-track deadlines, so Canada could still be accommodated whenever a deal is worked out.

“Obviously these are congressionally set legislative parameters, and if Congress wants to change that, I’m sure we can make it happen, regardless of the interpretations that are out there,” Reed said.

The prospect that Democrats retake the House in November's midterm elections is adding an additional layer of uncertainty to the process.

Treasury Secretary Steven MnuchinSteven Terner MnuchinOn The Money: Waters clashes with Trump officials over 'disastrous' housing finance plan | Dems jump into Trump turf war over student loans | House passes bill targeting anonymous shell companies Two new Trump executive orders will shape up Treasury and hold bureaucracy accountable Trump has floated Mnuchin, Conway for White House chief of staff: report MORE said the administration still wants a deal with Canada, but he would still expect Congress to approve a deal that is only between the U.S. and Mexico.

“If for whatever reason we don’t reach an agreement with Canada, we’ll have an agreement with Mexico, a great agreement,” Mnuchin said during a Thursday event sponsored by the The Hill.

“I’m confident that Congress will pass that.”

U.S. negotiations with its northern neighbor have grown increasingly tense in recent months.

Over the summer, the U.S. halted trilateral negotiations and moved to pursue a deal with Mexico alone, in hopes that Canada would sign on under pressure.

Since then, progress has been slow.

Tensions were evident during a Trump press conference on Wednesday when he said he had turned down a meeting with Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau — a meeting Canadian officials said was never sought — at the United Nations.

"His tariffs are too high, and he doesn’t seem to want to move, and I’ve told him ‘forget about it,' " Trump told reporters during a press conference at the United Nations in New York.

"We’re very unhappy with the negotiations and the negotiation style of Canada. We don’t like their representative very much," he added in an apparent reference to Freeland.

Lighthizer said earlier in the week that there was “still a fair amount of distance” over “very large issues” on NAFTA, including U.S. access to Canada’s dairy market.

Yet both Trump and Lighthizer left open the chance that Canada will eventually come into the agreement.

Some Democrats have expressed frustration over Trump’s acerbic approach toward Canada in the negotiations.

Rep. Brian HigginsBrian HigginsHere are the 95 Democrats who voted to support impeachment On The Money: Sanders unveils plan to wipe .6T in student debt | How Sanders plan plays in rivalry with Warren | Treasury watchdog to probe delay of Harriet Tubman bills | Trump says Fed 'blew it' on rate decision Democrats give Trump trade chief high marks MORE (D-N.Y.) told BBC Business earlier in the week that the Trump administration has failed in its obligations to rework NAFTA and that a trade deal without Canada "is an abject failure."

The Canadians have been relatively cool to Trump's criticisms, and defended their stance to pursue a good deal for their country.

Trudeau told reporters in Ottawa on Thursday that “the Americans are finding that the negotiations are tough because Canadians are tough negotiators, as we should be,” according to news reports.

“But a good, fair deal is still very possible. We won’t sign a bad deal for Canadians,” he said.

Even with all the tension there is still optimism around the ability for the U.S. and Canada to finally reach a deal.

The two nations signed a 12-nation Trans-Pacific Partnership agreement in early 2016 after years of talks.

"My sense is that there is still time for Canada and the U.S. to reach agreement on this," said Simon Lester, a trade expert at the Cato Institute.

"It's not clear what the actual deadline is for working things out, but I would think anything done in the next couple weeks would still be acceptable," he said.

"The question is, are either Canada or the U.S. willing to give ground on the key issues?" he said. "Is there a compromise to be struck? We shall see."