Business groups brace for Dem push to hike corporate taxes

The business community is bracing for Democratic proposals to raise the corporate tax rate to pay for infrastructure spending and other priorities.

Infrastructure is seen as one of the rare areas where Democrats and President TrumpDonald John TrumpTed Cruz knocks New York Times for 'stunning' correction on Kavanaugh report US service member killed in Afghanistan Pro-Trump website edited British reality star's picture to show him wearing Trump hat MORE might be able to come to a deal, since both sides have called for improvements to the nation’s roads, railways and bridges.

The problem is how to pay for the new spending.

ADVERTISEMENT

Many in Washington expect Democrats to push for a hike in the corporate tax rate, which was slashed under the tax law championed by Trump.

“I have no doubt that it will be considered,” said Marcia Hale, president of the infrastructure advocacy group Building America’s Future.

That’s a non-starter for business groups, and likely will be for Trump and most congressional Republicans as well.

“Talk of repealing any part of the tax reform bill is a non-starter,” Ed Mortimer, U.S. Chamber vice president of transportation and infrastructure, said in a statement to The Hill.

The GOP tax law cut the corporate tax rate from 35 percent to 21 percent as part of an effort to make the U.S. more in line with other countries.

Many Democrats also thought the corporate tax rate was too high at 35 percent, but view the GOP cut as too large. Congressional Democrats also voted unanimously against the tax law, arguing that it disproportionately benefited businesses and wealthy individuals.

Democrats have already released some proposals to roll back the corporate tax cut and other aspects of the GOP tax law in order to pay for infrastructure.

Last year, top Senate Democrats proposed raising the corporate rate to 25 percent, and rolling back parts of the tax law that benefit the wealthy, to fund $1 trillion in infrastructure investments. The Democrats said that the corporate-tax increase would raise $359 billion over 10 years.

Outgoing Rep. John DelaneyJohn Kevin DelaneyTrump campaign mocks Democratic debate: 'Another informercial for President Trump' The Hill's 12:30 Report: House panel approves impeachment powers Sanders slips in NH, Biden and Warren in statistical dead heat MORE (D-Md.), who is running for president, has floated increasing the corporate tax rate to 23 percent to raise about $200 billion for infrastructure.

“This small change to the new tax law would be more than worth it, because smart infrastructure investment helps businesses compete and grow,” Delaney said in a letter to Trump earlier this year.

Henry Connelly, a spokesman for House Minority Leader Nancy PelosiNancy PelosiThe Hill's Morning Report - Trump takes 2020 roadshow to New Mexico This week: House jump-starts effort to prevent shutdown Schumer, Pelosi push Trump to back universal background check bill MORE (D-Calif.), the favorite to become Speaker next year, said  “Democrats are looking at a variety of options to pay for bold infrastructure investments in the next Congress.”

Rep. Peter DeFazioPeter Anthony DeFazioThe Hill's 12:30 Report: Trump issues Taliban warning at Sept. 11 memorial Overnight Energy: Democrats call for Ross to resign over report he threatened NOAA officials | Commerce denies report | Documents detail plan to decentralize BLM | Lawmakers demand answers on bee-killing pesticide Oregon Democrats push EPA to justify use of pesticide 'highly toxic' to bees MORE (Ore.), the top Democrat on the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee, said on a call with reporters the day after the midterm election that some people are talking about rescinding some of the tax cuts as a way to pay for infrastructure but that the decision will ultimately be up to the Ways and Means Committee.

DeFazio’s preference would be a more sustainable source of funding, In an interview with MarketWatch published Monday, DeFazio was somewhat critical of using a rescinding of the GOP tax cuts for the wealthy.

“Since we’re borrowing, what, a trillion and a half dollars to pay for the tax cuts, it doesn’t sound like real money, and it doesn’t sound sustainable,” he said.

Some business groups are preparing to defend the tax law’s corporate-rate cut.

“Raising the rate on job creating businesses of all sizes and the workers they employ as a source of revenue for the Highway Trust Fund, for instance, wouldn't just be an unprecedented course of action – it would be an unacceptable consequence for tax reform's true beneficiaries: the American workforce,” said the RATE Coalition, a group of businesses and trade associations that advocated for the corporate-rate cut during the tax debate.

A spokeswoman for Business Roundtable said that “infrastructure proposals can and should complement the benefits of tax reform — not counteract them.”

David French, senior vice president of government relations at the National Retail Federation, said he thinks “the economics of the corporate tax rate have been successful” and that raising the rate to pay for infrastructure spending isn’t a good idea.

Paying for an infrastructure bill by rolling back the corporate-rate cut would also be a nonstarter with the GOP Senate.

“Hiking taxes on U.S. businesses would hurt American competitiveness in the global economy and could lead to significant layoffs of American workers,” incoming Senate Finance Committee Chairman Chuck GrassleyCharles (Chuck) Ernest Grassley'Mike Pounce' trends on Twitter after Trump slip at GOP retreat Cruz warns GOP support for expanded background checks could help elect Warren president Lawmakers applaud Trump's ban on flavored e-cigarettes MORE (R-Iowa) said in a statement Wednesday.

A spokesman for Senate Environment and Public Works Committee John BarrassoJohn Anthony BarrassoHouse votes to block drilling in Arctic refuge Lobbying World Meet the Democratic senator trying to negotiate gun control with Trump MORE (R-Wyo.) said the senator “will consider serious proposals to pay for infrastructure” but that rolling back the tax cuts isn’t such an idea.

The White House criticized the Senate Democrats’ proposal when they unveiled it in March, but a White House spokeswoman declined to comment for this story.

At a press conference the day after the midterms, Trump said he'd be open to making “some adjustment” to the tax cuts for corporations and high earners if Democrats propose tax cuts for the middle class.

It’s unclear exactly what infrastructure pay-for option could garner enough bipartisan support to pass. An increase in the federal gas tax is supported by some lawmakers and the Chamber of Commerce, but is still likely to be politically challenging.

Besides infrastructure, Democrats have also suggested ticking up the corporate rate in order to pay for other priorities. For example, during a House Ways and Means Committee markup in September, Democrats offered amendments that would have raised the corporate rate to pay for restoring the full state and local tax deduction and cementing a lower threshold for the medical-expense deduction.

Criticisms from the business community are unlikely to deter Democrats from pushing for a rollback of the corporate tax cut. Democrats have been arguing that companies are using their tax savings from the 2017 law primarily for stock buybacks rather than to hire more workers or raise wages.

Michael Linden, a fellow at the left-leaning Roosevelt Institute, said that the tax-cut law was a “political loser” for Republicans and that it’s smart politics for Democrats to propose raising the corporate rate to pay for things like infrastructure or an expansion of the earned income tax credit.

“That’s a very good trade economically,” he said. “That’s a no-brainer.”