Conservatives urge Trump to stick with Moore for Fed

Conservatives urge Trump to stick with Moore for Fed
© Getty Images

Conservatives are rallying around economist Stephen MooreStephen MooreAs nation freezes, fossil fuels are keeping the lights and heat on Economist Moore says he's not sure US needs 'massive stimulus bill' Sunday shows - Trump's COVID-19 relief bill opposition dominates MORE as President TrumpDonald TrumpTrump State Department appointee arrested in connection with Capitol riot Intelligence community investigating links between lawmakers, Capitol rioters Michelle Obama slams 'partisan actions' to 'curtail access to ballot box' MORE's controversial pick for the Federal Reserve Board faces a tough fight ahead.

Moore's allies in conservative circles are urging the president and GOP Senate to stand by the controversial potential nominee, who is facing criticism from across the political spectrum and new questions about the White House's support.


More than 100 economists, professors and activists issued a statement Monday backing Moore for a spot on the Fed board, and the organizers say others are seeking to join the list.

“Steve’s view of the world is something that’s going to be brand new for the Fed and they need to hear it,” Arthur Laffer, a prominent conservative economist close to Moore, said in a phone interview. Laffer was among the Moore supporters who signed the letter.

But their efforts to build momentum for Moore, who has not been formally nominated and is still being vetted, faced fresh uncertainty on Tuesday.

Larry KudlowLarry KudlowMORE, director of the White House National Economic Council, told reporters that officials are interviewing other candidates to potentially replace Moore and Herman CainHerman Cain'Trumpification' of the GOP will persist 'SNL' host Dave Chappelle urges Biden voters to be 'humble' winners 18 Trump rallies have led to 30,000 COVID-19 cases: Stanford University study MORE, another nominee to the Fed board, as the president's picks.

“We’re talking to a number of candidates. We always do,” Kudlow said. “Stephen Moore is in the process. We support him. We support Herman Cain.”

"We’ll just let things play out in the vetting," Kudlow added.

Moore's supporters are urging the administration to stick by their pick.

“I just hope against hope that there’s not an attempt to replace him,” said Laffer.

Moore declined to comment to The Hill.

Even before Kudlow's remarks, Moore faced a challenging path.

Critics of Moore have seized on his decades of partisan and often controversial commentary. His detractors say Moore’s harsh attacks on Fed officials, close ties to Trump and support for contentious economic ideas make him unfit for the central bank.

Trump floated nominating Moore and Cain to the central bank last month, sparking a firestorm of criticism. Cain, who ran for president in 2012, reportedly is considering withdrawing his name after GOP senators made it clear he lacked the votes for confirmation.

Those who support Moore say his unapologetic advocacy for conservative ideals would add a fresh perspective to the Fed. They also argue that he would find a way to work with the rest of his central bank colleagues despite his often-brash criticism of its current leadership.

Moore has long been a conservative voice in Washington but gained new prominence in 2016 as a Trump campaign adviser, working closely with future Treasury Secretary Steven MnuchinSteven MnuchinBiden cautious in making Trump tax returns decision Biden brings back bipartisan meetings at the White House On The Money: Schumer urges Democrats to stick together on .9T bill | Collins rules out GOP support for Biden relief plan | Powell fights inflation fears MORE and others to craft Trump’s economic agenda.

After the election, Moore became the chief evangelist for Trump’s economic policies. He advocated for the president’s proposed tax and spending cuts in several interviews and op-eds, including for The Hill, and co-authored a book with Laffer praising “Trumponomics.”

As Trump ramped up his criticism of the Fed’s rate hikes throughout 2018, Moore echoed his concerns. Moore called for the firing of top Fed officials and economists several times and accused Trump’s handpicked chairman, Jerome Powell, of incompetence.

GOP senators have recoiled at Trump’s consistent attacks on the Fed, and some Republicans have expressed concerns that Moore’s loyalty to the president could impede the central bank’s independence.

Other concerns include the more than $70,000 in taxes the IRS says he owes the federal government — a claim Moore disputes.

Republicans have already derailed two of Trump’s Fed picks. And one week after Trump floated Cain for the Fed board, four GOP senators said they would not support him, all but dooming a nomination.

Moore’s supporters are vying to protect him from a similar fate.

His allies say that Moore is far friendlier in private than his soundbites would let on and expressed confidence he would win over his Fed colleagues if confirmed.

“In person, he’s not that confrontational at all,” Laffer said.

“Once they meet him and sit down with him,” Laffer said of Fed officials, “they’ll fall for him like the rest of us do.”

Some Republicans have also rejected the notion that Moore’s partisan background and outspokenness should bar him from the Fed.

"If anything, what concerns me is this trend toward disqualifying people who have opinions [and] have expressed them,” said Sen. Kevin CramerKevin John CramerRon Johnson grinds Senate to halt, irritating many Senate votes to take up COVID-19 relief bill OVERNIGHT ENERGY: Interior reverses Trump policy that it says restricted science | Collins to back Haaland's Interior nomination | Republicans press Biden environment nominee on Obama-era policy MORE (R-N.D.), who opposed Cain’s nomination, on Friday. “We're going to have to start building robots for these jobs if we aren't careful."

No GOP senators have come out and opposed Moore for the Fed. And many have praised his record of advocacy for conservative economic ideals, while stopping short of directly endorsing him.

Sen. Chuck GrassleyChuck GrassleyGarland's AG nomination delayed by GOP roadblocks National Sheriffs' Association backs Biden pick for key DOJ role Bipartisan group of senators introduces bill to rein in Biden's war powers MORE (R-Iowa) called Moore “a good economist, free-market guy" that "ought to have a big voice in D.C.” And Sen. Richard ShelbyRichard Craig ShelbyCBC 'unequivocally' endorses Shalanda Young for White House budget chief Black Caucus members lobby Biden to tap Shalanda Young for OMB head On The Money: Senate panels postpone Tanden meetings in negative sign | Biden signs supply chain order after 'positive' meeting with lawmakers MORE (R-Ala.), the longest-tenured Republican on the Banking Committee, said Moore has “a lot of experience” in federal economic policy.

Moore’s critics counter that his unconventional economic opinions reflect a lack of fitness for the Fed. He faced a grilling in a live CNN interview last week over his shifting support for the gold standard, and economists have rebuffed his claims that broad price declines do not show up in federal inflation data.

Moore’s allies have pushed back on concerns about his intellectual qualifications.

“He’s got a long history of being a small-government Republican,” said J.W. Verret, a law professor at George Mason University. “The fact that he’s done some think tank punditry shouldn’t be held against him.”

If nominated, though, Moore can afford to lose few Republicans, with Democrats already vowing to give him a tough hearing.

In a letter to Moore, Sen. Elizabeth WarrenElizabeth WarrenPhilly city council calls on Biden to 'cancel all student loan debt' in first 100 days Hillicon Valley: High alert as new QAnon date approaches Thursday | Biden signals another reversal from Trump with national security guidance | Parler files a new case Senators question Bezos, Amazon about cameras placed in delivery vans MORE (D-Mass.), who sits on the Banking panel and is certain to oppose him, raised his past remarks, saying they "strongly suggest that you lack the capacity to exercise the seriousness, care, consistency, and political independence expected of members of the Board of Governors."

Updated at 9:28 p.m