Pass USMCA Coalition drops stance on passing USMCA

Pass USMCA Coalition drops stance on passing USMCA
© Getty Images

A business-backed trade group established to back President TrumpDonald TrumpIran's leader vows 'revenge,' posting an image resembling Trump Former Sanders spokesperson: Biden 'backing away' from 'populist offerings' Justice Dept. to probe sudden departure of US attorney in Atlanta after Trump criticism MORE’s United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA) has backed off from taking a position on the treaty following compromises made by the White House in its negotiations with House Democrats.

The group, called the Pass USMCA Coalition, objected to changes in the North American trade treaty related to pharmaceuticals, a major concession point sought by Democrats.

“As originally written, USMCA was a win for American workers, businesses, and innovators -- and could have been a model for future agreements,” the group wrote in a statement reacting to the updated deal, which was announced Tuesday.

“The unnecessary decision to strip certain intellectual property protections is particularly concerning, as it puts American scientists and creators at a serious disadvantage abroad,” it added.

The group boasted a slew of former lawmakers and politicians as its central advocates, including Trump’s former deputy chief of staff Rick Dearborn, former House Democratic Caucus Chairman Rep. Joseph Crowley (N.Y.), and former GOP Rep. Erik PaulsenErik Philip PaulsenMinnesota Rep. Dean Phillips wins primary Pass USMCA Coalition drops stance on passing USMCA Two swing-district Democrats raise impeachment calls after whistleblower reports MORE (Minn.).

But following the release of the compromise deal, which earned the support of the AFL-CIO labor union, the group has backed off the pro-USMCA position in its name.

“The Coalition will not release any more statements and has no position on the USMCA as it's written now,” a spokeswoman for the group told The Hill.

Although the updated treaty is expected to pass with broad bipartisan support, some in the GOP have expressed consternation that the White House had allowed the deal to drift too far to the left.

Sen. Pat ToomeyPatrick (Pat) Joseph ToomeyGovernment used Patriot Act to gather website visitor logs in 2019 Appeals court rules NSA's bulk phone data collection illegal Dunford withdraws from consideration to chair coronavirus oversight panel MORE (R-Pa.) said the deal was worse than the current trade pact with Canada and Mexico, the North American Free Trade Agreement.

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnellAddison (Mitch) Mitchell McConnellTrump selects South Carolina lawyer for impeachment trial McConnell proposes postponing impeachment trial until February For Biden, a Senate trial could aid bipartisanship around COVID relief MORE (R-Ky.) said of the deal that “it’s not as good as I had hoped.” A meeting to update GOP senators on the specifics of the deal on Thursday left many grumbling that they had been excluded from the process.

Speaker Nancy PelosiNancy PelosiOvernight Health Care: Biden unveils virus plan and urges patience | Fauci says it's 'liberating' working under Biden | House to move quickly on COVID-19 relief Overnight Defense: House approves waiver for Biden's Pentagon nominee | Biden to seek five-year extension of key arms control pact with Russia | Two more US service members killed by COVID-19 On The Money: Pelosi says House will move immediately on COVID-19 relief | Biden faces backlash over debt | 900,000 more Americans file for unemployment benefits MORE (D-Calif.), on the other hand, told her caucus earlier in the week that “we stayed on this and we ate their lunch.”