Lawmakers strike spending deal to avert shutdown

Lawmakers reached a deal in principle Thursday on 12 annual spending bills to fund the government and avoid a shutdown.

Appropriators reached agreement on a number of contentious issues, including how to fund President TrumpDonald John TrumpJoe Arpaio loses bid for his old position as sheriff Trump brushes off view that Russia denigrating Biden: 'Nobody's been tougher on Russia than I have' Trump tees up executive orders on economy but won't sign yet MORE's proposed border wall.

“We had a very good meeting, and there’s a meeting of the minds, and we’re going to look through some of the details, but I feel confident that we’re going to have a product very shortly,” House Appropriations Committee Chairwoman Nita LoweyNita Sue LoweyIt's past time to be rid of the legacy of Jesse Helms Helping our seniors before it's too late House approves .3 trillion spending package for 2021 MORE (D-N.Y.) said Thursday following days of negotiations.

ADVERTISEMENT

Details of the legislation remain under wraps, but House Majority Leader Steny HoyerSteny Hamilton HoyerThe Hill's Morning Report - Presented by the Air Line Pilots Association - Negotiators 'far apart' as talks yield little ahead of deadline On The Money: Pessimism grows as coronavirus talks go down to the wire | Jobs report poised to light fire under COVID-19 talks | Tax preparers warn unemployment recipients could owe IRS Overnight Health Care: Ohio governor tests positive for COVID-19 ahead of Trump's visit | US shows signs of coronavirus peak, but difficult days lie ahead | Trump: COVID-19 vaccine may be ready 'right around' Election Day MORE (D-Md.) said he expects to bring the legislation up for a vote on Tuesday, likely grouped into at least two packages.

Democrats say they have received assurances that Trump will sign the bills once they pass, averting a shutdown after the Dec. 20 funding deadline.

Though Treasury Secretary Steven MnuchinSteven Terner MnuchinTrump tees up executive orders on economy but won't sign yet Overnight Health Care: Trump to take executive action after coronavirus talks collapse | Vaccine official says he'd resign if pressured politically Coronavirus talks collapse as negotiators fail to reach deal MORE had been involved in meetings, including one on Tuesday and two on Thursday morning, lawmakers said the White House took a hands-off approach to the final round of negotiations.

“They’ve been involved,” said Senate Appropriations Committee Chairman Richard ShelbyRichard Craig ShelbyWary GOP eyes Meadows shift from brick-thrower to dealmaker On The Money: Pessimism grows as coronavirus talks go down to the wire | Jobs report poised to light fire under COVID-19 talks | Tax preparers warn unemployment recipients could owe IRS Pessimism grows as coronavirus talks go down to the wire MORE (R-Ala.), “but we have to make the decisions."

"I think that we will be fine,” he added.

Lawmakers have worked furiously to advance the spending legislation and fund the government beyond the holidays.

ADVERTISEMENT

Last year, a last-minute reversal on wall funding from Trump led to a 35-day shutdown starting in late December — the longest shutdown in the nation's history.

While lawmakers said Thursday that the major issues had been buttoned up, the details of the agreement were not expected to be made public until Monday.

Committee staffers are expected to work through the weekend to finalize language and smaller issues ahead of the likely Tuesday vote.

There were some indications that Democrats gave ground on the wall, moving from the zero-funding position they took in their original version of the bill.

Following a Wednesday meeting with the Congressional Hispanic Caucus and House Speaker Nancy PelosiNancy PelosiDemocratic convention lineup to include Ocasio-Cortez, Clinton, Warren: reports Trump tees up executive orders on economy but won't sign yet New postmaster general overhauls USPS leadership amid probe into mail delays MORE (D-Calif.), Lowey acknowledged that they may lose some votes on the left.

“Not everyone can vote for the bills, and we just need enough votes to pass, and I’d like to get the majority of Democrats, at least. And I hope we get some Republicans to support the bills, because it’s always good to have bipartisan support,” she said.

In the past two years, Democrats agreed to $1.5 billion and $1.375 billion in funds for upgrading existing physical barriers and erecting some new ones in consensus areas of the Rio Grande Valley.

Two court rulings this week strengthened Democrats' hands in negotiations, finding that Trump's use of emergency powers to fund the wall were unlawful.

Federal Judge Haywood Gilliam Jr. of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, an Obama appointee, said that the effort to reprogram military funding was an attempt to circumvent congressional approval.

“The border barrier projects Defendants now assert are 'necessary to support the use of the armed forces' are the very same projects Defendants sought — and failed — to build under [the Department on Homeland Security's] civilian authority, because Congress would not appropriate the requested funds,” he wrote.

The spending deal comes at the end of a whirlwind week in which Democrats marked up articles of impeachment against Trump but also struck a deal with him on the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA), his top trade achievement.

The agreement on $1.37 trillion in spending follows months of wrangling. Over the summer, Democrats and Republicans struck a deal to increase overall defense and domestic spending levels by billions of dollars, averting scheduled cuts that were enshrined into law.

ADVERTISEMENT

Since then, issues surrounding Trump's border wall, immigration detention, abortion and the president's use of emergency powers to transfer military funds toward the wall have repeatedly impeded progress.

Trump had requested $5 billion for his wall, plus an additional $3.6 billion to backfill reprogrammed military funds, an approach Democrats called a non-starter.

Congress was forced to pass two funding stopgap measures to prevent shutdowns in the new fiscal year, which began Oct. 1. They only agreed on how to allocate the funds among the various bills ahead of Thanksgiving.

But despite slow-going talks over the past week, appropriators stayed determined to hammer out a deal in order to pass all 12 bills before the Christmas holiday.

They feared that failure to do so would result in a months-long stopgap lasting until after a likely impeachment trial in the Senate. 

Updated at 5:38 p.m.