Judge puts new hold on Democrats' lawsuit seeking Trump tax returns

Judge puts new hold on Democrats' lawsuit seeking Trump tax returns
© Getty

A federal judge on Friday issued a stay of House Democrats' lawsuit aimed at obtaining President TrumpDonald John TrumpNearly 300 former national security officials sign Biden endorsement letter DC correspondent on the death of Michael Reinoehl: 'The folks I know in law enforcement are extremely angry about it' Late night hosts targeted Trump over Biden 97 percent of the time in September: study MORE's tax returns, after an appeals court agreed to rehear a different case that touches on some of the same legal issues.

Judge Trevor McFadden, a federal district court judge in Washington, D.C., and a Trump appointee, said in a court filing that the tax-return case is on hold "pending further order of this Court."

McFadden had initially put the case on hold in January, until the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit ruled in a separate lawsuit over House Democrats' subpoena of former White House counsel Don McGahn. Late last month, a three-judge panel for the appeals court issued an opinion finding that House Democrats didn't have standing to sue to enforce the McGahn subpoena.


House Democrats asked the full D.C. Circuit to rehear the McGahn case, and the court has agreed to do so.

The House's tax-return lawsuit includes one count stemming from Ways and Means Committee Chairman Richard NealRichard Edmund NealOn The Money: Kudlow confident that Trump can 'round up' Senate GOP behind coronavirus relief deal | US deficit spikes to record .1T Top Democrat: Tax credit expansions must be in next coronavirus relief package Treasury withheld nearly M from FDNY 9/11 health program MORE's (D-Mass.) subpoenas to the Treasury Department and IRS for Trump's tax returns, and seven counts stemming from Neal's request for the tax returns under a section of the federal tax code.

At a hearing earlier this month, McFadden asked Democrats if they would be willing to drop their subpoena enforcement claim in light of the three-judge ruling in the McGahn case, and instead just focus on their other claims. In a document filed after the hearing, House lawyers said that they wanted to push forward on both claims involving subpoena enforcement and the tax code section.

McFadden had signaled that he planned to stay the tax-return case if Democrats still wanted to move forward with their subpoena-enforcement claim, and he proceeded to do so on Friday.