Dems face internal battle over budget

Democrats are bracing for an internal battle as the House Budget Committee starts cobbling together its budget for 2020, a blueprint that’s expected to put the party's progressive wing at odds with its moderates.

The more liberal side of the Democratic Caucus wants the budget resolution to showcase a broad array of its policy initiatives, including elements of the "Green New Deal" and “Medicare for all.”

But moderate Democrats who won in districts that voted for President TrumpDonald John TrumpJimmy Carter: 'I hope there's an age limit' on presidency White House fires DHS general counsel: report Trump to cap California trip with visit to the border MORE in 2016 are concerned about signing onto those policies, and the political consequences of backing a budget that endorses them. Blue Dog Democrats, for example, prioritize reining in the nation’s exploding debt and will have to worry about voting for a budget that would lead to a $1 trillion deficit.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Doing a budget resolution that can get 218 votes is going to be a difficult task for us, I don’t think there’s any question about that," said House Budget Committee Chairman John YarmuthJohn Allen YarmuthMcConnell accepts Democratic rep's challenge to 5 debates House Democrats blur lines on support for impeachment White House won't move forward with billions in foreign aid cuts MORE (D-Ky.).

"We can only lose 17 votes, and if we don’t include a lot of the progressives’ priorities then we’ll lose a lot of them; if we spend too much money, we’ll lose some from the other side,” he added. “It’s not going to be easy.”

Democrats say they broadly agree about addressing problems like climate change, health care, infrastructure and immigration. Where they differ is the scale of the solution.

“A lot of what we have to do is do ‘more,’ ” said Rep. Pramila JayapalPramila JayapalPelosi woos progressives on prescription drug pricing plan Democrats ignore Asian American and Pacific Islander voters at their peril Overnight Health Care: Watchdog details severe trauma suffered by separated children | Judge approves B CVS-Aetna merger | House Dem Caucus chair backs 'Medicare for All' MORE (D-Wash.), who co-chairs the Congressional Progressive Caucus (CPC). “It’s not that we’re opposing [policies], necessarily, though in some cases we do oppose. A lot of it is we need more of something.”

Health care is a key example. At the request of the CPC, Yarmuth has agreed to hold hearings on Medicare for all in the spring. He is also planning hearings on the economic cost of climate change.

Even if the 2020 budget doesn’t include Medicare for all in its entirety, progressives want it to carve out a path forward.

ADVERTISEMENT

“The best push is to show the unstoppable momentum around this,” Jayapal said.

The budget resolution is a nonbinding document that sets spending levels and is used as a statement of policy goals.

A brief look at the Democratic 2020 presidential candidates shows that Medicare for all is far from the consensus party position.

While candidates such as Sens. Bernie SandersBernie SandersJimmy Carter: 'I hope there's an age limit' on presidency 2020 candidates keep fitness on track while on the trail Mark Mellman: The most important moment in history? MORE (I-Vt.), Elizabeth WarrenElizabeth Ann WarrenKavanaugh impeachment push hits Capitol buzz saw Mark Mellman: The most important moment in history? Katie Pavlich: The Democrats' desperate do-overs MORE (D-Mass.) and Kamala HarrisKamala Devi HarrisKavanaugh impeachment push hits Capitol buzz saw Mark Mellman: The most important moment in history? Biden leads in new national poll, Warren close behind in second place MORE (D-Calif.) are behind some version of the plan, moderates like Sen. Amy KlobucharAmy Jean KlobucharMark Mellman: The most important moment in history? Democrats press for action on election security Antitrust enforcers in turf war over Big Tech MORE (D-Minn.) and possible contender Sen. Sherrod BrownSherrod Campbell BrownBipartisan housing finance reform on the road less taken Hillicon Valley: Google to promote original reporting | Senators demand answers from Amazon on worker treatment | Lawmakers weigh response to ransomware attacks Senate Democrats want answers on 'dangerous' Amazon delivery system MORE (D-Ohio) are skeptical of the plan that’s a form of single-payer.

The same is true of the Green New Deal, a comprehensive proposal that sets dramatic goals to eliminate U.S. carbon emissions by 2030. The measure has varying levels of support within the party, but progressives could push to include some of its components in the budget resolution.

“I think what we try to do is make everything as progressive as possible in the Democratic budget,” said Jayapal.

But those aren’t the only issues on progressives’ wish list.

When asked about his budget priorities, Rep. Raúl Grijalva (D-Ariz.), who co-chaired the CPC in the previous Congress, rattled off several issues.

“Education, health care, and rebuilding what has already been cut around public lands and waters,” he said.

Rep. Ro KhannaRohit (Ro) KhannaYoung insurgents aren't rushing to Kennedy's side in Markey fight Khanna: I 'didn't appreciate' Castro's attack on Biden Overwhelming majority of voters want lawmakers to work with other party MORE (D-Calif.), a CPC leader and member of the Budget Committee, mentioned wanting $80 billion to expand high-speed internet, $40 billion for vocational training programs and a massive infrastructure plan.

“The trillion-dollar infrastructure bill, that would create jobs,” he said.

Some of those policies, and dollar amounts, spell trouble for the moderate wing of the party, including the slew of freshmen who won in red districts, helping sweep Democrats back into the majority.

Rep. Conor Lamb (D-Pa.) is among the lawmakers who won in a tough race by campaigning on fixing ObamaCare instead of talking about Medicare for all, as well as avoiding support for liberal priorities like a $15 minimum wage.

One of the central concerns tying moderates together on policy is issues of cost, a rallying cry for the 27 Blue Dog Democrats.

“We all agree that infrastructure, climate change, and health care are among the most urgent problems that need to be addressed — and we will have a healthy debate on how to create bipartisan solutions that can be implemented in this era of divided government,” said Rep. Lou CorreaJose (Lou) Luis CorreaBlue Dog Democrats urge action on election security House Democrats unveil bill to ensure citizenship for children of service members Members to have little time to question Mueller MORE (D-Calif.), a co-chair of the coalition. “We need to address all of these issues in a fiscally responsible way that recognizes our nation’s unprecedented level of debt.”

Some progressives acknowledge that price tags could be problematic. One study estimated that Medicare for all could cost as much as $32 trillion.

“We’re beginning to look at real discussions about, budgetarily, what it means when we talk about Medicare for all,” Grijalva said. “I think at some point we’re going to have a vote on that, and it would probably be good to at least know what those figures are.”

There are other pressures on spending as well.

The White House plans on asking for a $75 billion increase in defense spending, though it plans to ask for most of that money to be allocated outside budget caps. That would leave Democrats searching for a different formula than the one they have been using in recent budget talks, where they have sought parity between increases in defense and nondefense caps.

Yarmuth said that with the GOP’s 2017 tax cuts baked in, the budget resolution will not be able to set a path toward a balanced budget in 10 years, a common goal when drafting the document.

“We’re going to try to get the deficit down, but there’s no way we can get to balance in a 10-year window,” he said. “I think most of us in the caucus are committed to making sure it doesn’t get worse. So that’s step one: quit digging.”

But progressives like Jayapal say that while party unity is important, they intend to push their agenda forcefully.

She also said she would consider withholding votes from a budget that doesn’t fulfill progressive priorities.

“Why would we give away all our leverage now by saying ‘absolutely not, no?’ ” she said.