Trade vote stirs angst on the right

Trade vote stirs angst on the right

Trade legislation is sowing discord among Senate Republicans that could make it tougher than expected to pass fast-track trade authority and the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP).

While much of the attention in the trade fight has focused on the divide between President Obama and liberal Democrats, Republican leaders are facing dissent within their own caucus because of currency manipulation and immigration concerns.

“The polling is bad, and some people are getting nervous,” said a GOP senator who requested anonymity to talk about his conversations with colleagues.

ADVERTISEMENT

Senate Republicans are looking for political cover to vote for trade promotion authority (TPA) legislation, which would empower Obama to negotiate the TPP — a trade pact with 11 nations — that could not be amended or filibustered in Congress.

Potential Republican “no” votes on the bill include Sens. Jeff SessionsJefferson (Jeff) Beauregard SessionsDOJ puts its integrity in doubt by interfering with immigration courts Trump shakes up Justice Department, intelligence community Do people think ill of Jeff Sessions merely based on the sound of his voice? MORE (Ala.), Lindsey GrahamLindsey Olin GrahamMSNBC's Chris Matthews confuses South Carolina Democratic Senate candidate with GOP's Tim Scott Lindsey Graham thanks Trump, bemoans 'never-ending bull----' at South Carolina rally  The Hill's Morning Report — Presented by Facebook — Washington, Wall Street on edge about coronavirus MORE (S.C.), Richard BurrRichard Mauze BurrTrump again taps Ratcliffe to serve as intelligence chief Surveillance fight emerges as intelligence flashpoint Congress eyes killing controversial surveillance program MORE (N.C.) and Shelley Moore CapitoShelley Wellons Moore CapitoRepublicans growing nervous about 2020 economy Trump hammers Manchin over impeachment vote Senate drama surrounding Trump trial starts to fizzle MORE (W.Va.).

Ten to 15 Senate Democrats are expected to vote for the fast-track bill, which means Republican leaders can only afford to lose fewer than 10 caucus members.

“I think it’s going to be tight,” said Sen. John BoozmanJohn Nichols BoozmanOn The Money: Stocks have worst week in a decade on coronavirus fears | Fed chief hints at rate cut | Trump pushes central bank for action | Kudlow advises investors to 'think about buying the dip' Republicans growing nervous about 2020 economy Overnight Defense: Pentagon policy chief resigns at Trump's request | Trump wishes official 'well in his future endeavors' | Armed Services chair warns against Africa drawdown after trip MORE (R-Ark.), who is leaning in favor of voting yes because the farm community supports the legislation.

 Republican senators say Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnellAddison (Mitch) Mitchell McConnellThe Hill's Morning Report — Presented by Facebook — Washington, Wall Street on edge about coronavirus Overnight Energy: Murkowski, Manchin unveil major energy bill | Lawmakers grill EPA chief over push to slash agency's budget | GOP lawmaker accuses Trump officials of 'playing politics' over Yucca Mountain Lawmakers race to pass emergency coronavirus funding MORE (R-Ky.) and his leadership team have begun to count votes, a sign that they’re not taking passage of the measures for granted.

“It could be a problem depending on how few Democrats vote for it. The president has to step up and work it,” said another GOP senator, who requested anonymity to discuss his party’s whip count.

While the trade deals are popular with the business community, they are controversial among the conservative base in states — such as Ohio, Illinois, Wisconsin, North Carolina and South Carolina — where Republican incumbents are running for reelection next year.

“Why would any Republican give President Obama more authority?” said Ed Martin, president of Eagle Forum, a conservative advocacy group.

Beyond the procedural argument, Martin said a growing number of people in the GOP base think free trade agreements are harmful for the working class and bad for jobs.

“The Republican Party is becoming aware of this more and more,” Martin said. “I don’t think Republicans should make it easier to have more free trade agreements that are bad for this country.”

A survey conducted by YouGov.com at the end of March found that 39 percent of Republicans think free trade agreements have a negative impact on wages and jobs. Thirty-one percent of Democrats felt the deals would depress wages, while 24 percent thought they would hurt employment.

The same survey showed only 10 percent of Republicans think free trade agreements will boost wages.

Patrick Davis, a Republican strategist, said GOP voters’ views of free trade have changed since the passage of the North American Free Trade Agreement in the early ’90s, especially in northern Illinois, Michigan, Wisconsin, Ohio and South Carolina.

“The base voters, Republican voters and even Tea Party voters, are economic voters,” Davis said. “Those in Washington in the Republican leadership are at odds with their base over this issue because Republicans and Tea Party types have seen wages go down, lost wages and lost jobs since the last time we did a big trade deal.”

The fast-track bill passed out of the Finance Committee on Wednesday with a strong bipartisan vote, 20-6. Seven Democrats voted for it and only one Republican, Burr, voted no.

Burr told The Hill he was concerned that tobacco, a major product in his home state, might receive unfair treatment in future trade agreements.

While the number of Democrats who voted for the fast-track bill — which was jointly negotiated by Senate Finance Committee Chairman Orrin HatchOrrin Grant HatchTrump administration backs Oracle in Supreme Court battle against Google Timeline: Trump and Romney's rocky relationship Key Republicans say Biden can break Washington gridlock MORE (R-Utah), House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Paul RyanPaul Davis RyanGaetz tells CPAC he won't take PAC money Paul Ryan says he disagrees with Romney's impeachment vote Trump doubles down on Neil Cavuto attacks: 'Will he get the same treatment as' Shep Smith? MORE (R-Wis.) and Sen. Ron WydenRonald (Ron) Lee WydenHillicon Valley — Presented by Facebook — FCC fines mobile carriers 0M for selling user data | Twitter verified fake 2020 candidate | Dems press DHS to complete election security report | Reddit chief calls TikTok spyware FCC proposes over 0 million in fines against top mobile carriers FCC to hit mobile carriers with fines over location sharing: report MORE (Ore.), the ranking Democrat on Finance — appeared promising, Democratic aides say the final number of Democratic yeses is unlikely to exceed 15.

“It’s possible that more than half of the yes votes already voted for it in committee,” said a senior Democratic aide.

Republicans have expressed concerns over enhanced trade authority that include the measure’s failure to address currency manipulation by China and others, the possibility that it could empower Obama to increase immigration levels and the fate of home-state exports such as tobacco and coal.

“I’m really looking at it carefully. Our state is under serious economic distress right now. So I’m going to look at it to see if it brings greater opportunities,” Capito said.

Sessions is worried that giving Obama, and future presidents, fast-track power could serve as a backdoor to increased immigration.

He circulated a “Dear Colleague” letter recently warning: “The real danger here is that before the ink is dry on TPA, and at any time during the life of TPA, any president can negotiate changes to our immigration laws.”

The Finance Committee has pushed back against this criticism, issuing a memo asserting the Obama administration has no authority under TPA or any pending trade agreement to unilaterally change immigration law.

 The failure of the TPA bill to address currency manipulation is a problem for Graham and Sen. Rob PortmanRobert (Rob) Jones PortmanSeniors, businesses grapple with landmark retirement law Where do we go from here? Conservation can show the way GOP senators offering bill to cement business provision in Trump tax law MORE (R-Ohio), who served as U.S. Trade Representative under former President George W. Bush and is facing a tough reelection.

The Finance Committee rejected Portman’s amendment that would have required the executive branch to include enforceable currency manipulation standards in any future trade deal. 

Portman’s proposal also would have put “teeth” into International Monetary Fund standards for currency that other countries have already agreed to, according to a summary from his office.

Portman said the current language in the fast-track legislation is “aspirational” but not “enforceable,” and warned he is not an automatic yes on the floor vote even though he supported the measure in committee.

“It’s a tougher choice because I think it’s important to have in there,” he said.

The Finance panel voted 18-8 to add language to a separate customs enforcement bill requiring the Commerce Department to crack down on currency manipulation by imposing duties.

But Republicans concerned about the issue grumble there’s little chance that that legislation will become law.

“That’s problematic for me,” Graham said about the rejection of Portman’s amendment.

“Will the currency legislation that was adopted, will it get to the president’s desk? I need to know that.”