"If medical malpractice reform means special courts that fast-track medical cases or strong incentives to settle cases early or requirements that there be an expert affidavit that backs up the allegation of medical malpractice, I'm for those things and I think they'll work," Andrews said. "I think that's an area the president has put forward in good faith and we should work with him on it."
Andrews also said tort-reform grants in the healthcare reform law should also be given a chance to work. The law authorized $50 million for five-year demonstration grants for states to experiment with tort litigation alternatives starting this fiscal year, but the money was not appropriated because the law was enacted after the president's FY11 budget request reached Congress.
The administration did announce $25 million in medical liability grants in June 2010 after the president called for such an investment in his September 2009 healthcare address to a joint session of Congress.
The president's suggestion was immediately blasted by trial lawyers' groups, including the American Association for Justice, while the American Medical Association cheered on. Even limited malpractice reforms will have a hard time getting through the Democrat-controlled Senate.
"I think developing the state program is a start that's worth exploring further before we get too far down the road," said Sen. Sheldon WhitehouseSheldon WhitehouseBipartisan lawmakers target judges' stock trading with new bill Under pressure, Democrats cut back spending Equilibrium/Sustainability — Presented by Southern Company — Nations plan to pump oil despite net zero promises MORE (D-R.I.), one of trial lawyers' staunchest allies on Capitol Hill. "The Constitution is pretty serious about people's right to a jury, and as we have so many people in the [Capitol] building now who are seeking to anchor themselves to the Constitution, they'd do well to reflect [on] that."